This book was my second Goodreads Giveaway win, and it was announced to me only 2 or so days after I wrote the review for my first win. The short story is: write reviews and get free stuff. Thanks to Goodreads, Doubleday, and Christopher Reich for the free book. And Goodreads: I'm expecting my next win shortly. :)
I have read a few Reich books in the past and thoroughly enjoyed them. He is normally a master of the financial intrigue, and I was looking forward to the same in this book. While it's an OK story, he doesn't quite hit the full mark that his previous books led me to expect in this one, and the result is more of a police procedural than an international thriller.
His writing can be a bit trite at times in this novel (e.g., "no sh!t, Sherlock," "he had sworn never to go to a hospital to die," "NYC. The center of the universe," "for all intents and purposes"), and with such a large vocabulary available in the English language, "trite" is a pretty insulting thing to say about someone's writing. There was also a large amount of niggling grammatical errors -- the types of little things that wouldn't matter to someone with a 6th grade reading level, but which would enrage experienced readers and other writers (who/whom mistakes, sentence fragments in narrative, sentences ending with prepositions unnecessarily, split infinitives, etc.). I don't ask for perfection out of mass-market writers, but I do ask for some degree of consistency -- and if you're a mass-market, bestselling author, you should have a crack editing staff telling you these things. My services are available, and my rates are quite reasonable.
There were some instances of writing that caught my eye in a good way. A character finally describes the proper distinction between "assault" and "battery" (if you actually hit someone, it's battery; assault is merely the threat). The hedge fund manager (high-strung partner of the main character) has a great internal monologue about not knowing where to go or what to do when the office was completely empty, a good description of the lack of a life that some people have outside of their work.
Unfortunately, I found many troubling plot points: (1) The two main characters, divorced parents of an ambiguously-aged-but-presumably-teenaged daughter, are both caught up in dangerous parallel investigations that have them risking their lives, yet as of p. 269 (well into the threat against both of them), not a mention is made of arranging safety for the daughter. A threat against her is even made by one of the main antagonists on p. 306, yet no arrangements for her safety are made, neither parent ceases investigations to find her, and, most surprising of all, none of the many minions of the antagonists even attempts to take her hostage. In fact, mere hours after being tortured by the bad guys, the father is back at his office looking at the market, rather than trying to find out where his family is and if they're safe (and, by the way, for the rest of the book there's no mention of the injuries caused by the torture, which should have been permanent or at least long-lasting). These aren't parents; they're job-obsessed egotists, and the daughter is such a peripheral plot point in their lives as to merit little to no mention. The book would not have changed at all if the entire idea of the daughter had simply been deleted (the daughter didn't even affect how the parents interact with one another, which is simply unbelievable).
(2) Much of the troubling information about the main bad guys could have been found (and, in fact, later in the plot WAS found) through simple Google searches or other available public records searches. This presumes that people investing and trading literally BILLIONS of dollars don't do a single shred of background checks on the people who are giving them huge barrels of money. In the post-9/11 age of crackdowns on terrorist financing, I find that hard to believe.
(3) An African-American, good-sized adult male CIA agent is described as having size 7 feet. Maybe after foot-binding.
(4) The head of the NY Stock Exchange is on the Board of Directors of a foreign country's sovereign wealth investment company? I'm not an expert in international finance, but that seems like a very large conflict of interest. If it's not already illegal, it should be.
(5) The main source of the protagonists' intel on the threat is a guy who is described as a Marine, who suddenly has super-hacker skills. He's not described as a Marine super-hacker, but as a regular soldier on the ground. There's no explanation of why this guy has the ability to hack into things that the FBI and the NSA couldn't discover. He's deus ex semper-fi, or marinus ex machina.
(6) There's a general lack of understanding of how criminal law works, and especially how international criminal law works, which is especially bad given the fact that one of the main characters (the mother of the forgotten daughter) is an FBI counter-terrorism agent. One passage says "a year from now when this thing [the big conspiracy at the heart of the book] finally gets to a court of law," when in actuality a conspiracy this large would (a) likely take 4 or 5 years to get to a court, and (b) that court would likely be an international tribunal (either the ICC for individual crimes or the ICJ for actions by a foreign state) or a black-site military tribunal like Gitmo. However, one of the main characters describes the potential for legal conflict as "we both know that isn't going to happen," meaning the government won't pursue the mastermind of the conspiracy. This is just wrong. The government may not start a land war in China over the investigation, but we all know that it would definitely investigate the crime and use diplomatic back channels to pressure the other nation to make things right, especially when the crime at issue is an attack on the nation's financial center. It's not a black-and-white, casus belli vs. complete inaction scenario. There are shades of grey between the two, and I guarantee that if China attacked America's financial centers, there would be an investigation and at least some repercussions.
(7) Towards the end, one of the main bad guys gets shown into the location of the NYSE's secure servers, providing a false name to do so, even though (spoiler alert here) he's someone who is well-known among investors and fund managers as the head of an extremely large family investment company. On top of that, his tour guide takes him into the heart of the security gateway for every trade made on the exchange, a large server room (described as a room "housing six mainframe computers," which is a bit of an anachronism), in which the tour guide and the bad guy are the only people -- no security, no apparent cameras, no passwords or physical key locks to access ports to the servers, merely a matter of disabling the tour guide with a puff of powder (which, oddly and inexplicably, has no effect on the bad guy even though airborne and poisonous), then inserting a flash drive into the computer. The lack of security at one of the world's most important financial information centers is inexcusable, and probably not reflective of reality.
But aside from the plot points noted above, the biggest problem I have with this book is its end moral. One of the main characters (the father of the daughter noted above) was the owner and main driving force behind a private hedge fund company. He bet a lot of money (BILLIONS of dollars, of his and his investors' money) on a single currency valuation bet. His personal and corporate solvency, and large chunks of his clients' money, was tied into this ONE INSANE GAMBLE THAT EVERYONE THOUGHT WAS GOING TO FAIL. While that bet was somewhat caught up in the events of the conspiracy at the heart of the book, so its outcome wasn't dictated by purely market forces, it's indicative of a larger problem: the hubris and unnecessary risk-taking of the world's financial leaders. And Reich applauds these character traits, painting the protagonist as a prodigy and a self-made man and a panoply of other positive descriptors, even though the man had lost his relationships with his father, his wife, and his daughter, had lost $600 million of his and his firm's money, and had few (if any) real friends in the world (even his business partner is never seen around him in any capacity but business). (Further spoiler alert:) His big currency valuation bet loses, and he becomes virtually bankrupt at the end, and yet the final pages show him and his partner (the one noted above who couldn't figure out what to do when the office was empty) starting a new firm from scratch, ready to start the gambling all over again. Reich obviously sees a dedicated professional doing what he knows how to do; I see an addict getting high with other people's money, the source of many of the world's financial woes for the last few years and pretty much the last person I want working with my money. I wish Reich had ended the story with a moral that someone learned something from the events of the novel. Unfortunately, it appears that no one did.
In sum, an OK book, but not the brilliance of Reich's earlier works.