Wow... these authors' view of God is so mind-bogglingly repugnant. I sometimes forget that within the realm of evangelicalism, there are those who gravitate toward the ugliest, most evil, and absurd images of God found in scripture. Rather than wrestling with these verses, they embrace the worst interpretations and present them as if they are good, true, and wholesome. They are truly men right after John Calvin's heart.
The format of this book is to present emotions that often lead humans to behave in horrible ways towards others, such as contempt (the others successfully show the ugliness of contempt in human interactions), but then they always point to places in the Old Testament, where God has these emotions and acts out on them. So God, for example, mocks people, shames, devalues, shows people contempt, laughs people to scorn, and takes great delight in harming others (sadly, there is plenty in the OT that shows this). So in other words, Allender and Longmen seek to call our attention to many of the times that the Old Testament authors observed the worst and most toxic human behavior and projected this to their God. But, tragically, as inerrantists, the Allender and Longmen then must insist that all the horrible evil that is supposedly engaged in by God is thus holy and good. Worst, as believers in the Penal substitutionary view of the atonement, they typically mention how God then directed such contempt, jealous rage, anger, and hatred toward his only son, Jesus (oh, what a glorious gospel!). I kid you not. They show how horrible action X is, then show that the Bible has God regularly engage in X, and then share how the gospel is God unleashing X on his innocent son. The upside to all of this? I guess if you feel contempt and murderous rage for your spouse, this may be some extremely godly emotions--yet the precise distinction isn't made with behavior. Sure they point out that God's jealousy in the OT always leads to rage and lots of blood and slaughter, but they don't seem to think a husband should sexually assault and sadistically kill his wife in a jealous rage, even though the bible presents this as extremely noble behavior for God to partake in.
The authors must contradict themselves, as it is impossible to speak and live consistently with such disgusting, irrational, and harmful ideas. No doubt, they are decent people caught up in horrible theology. The book is thus a mixed bag, but you'll need to seek out the diamonds in this massive dunghill. You'll also need to wash those diamonds well. Honestly, considering the sensitive subject, just look elsewhere!
The way they express some things almost sounds satirical. It is as if they, like me, believed some ideas are really, really bad and then intentionally presented them so crudely that they seem overwhelmingly false, absurd, and morally macabre. Remarkably, though, they really believe it all. I suppose I am thankful that it is so nakedly expressed—but how can other people read it and not cringe?
Often, critiques of the penal substitutionary model of atonement are dismissed as strawman arguments. Critics of the critics claim that no one actually believes or presents the doctrine in such an absurd form. But then there are books like this. it shows some really do present it in a way that reveals how absurd, unjust, unloving, harmful, blasphemous, and frankly evil the doctrine is.
Their understanding of the atonement surfaced, where they talk about the fear of God, not being reverence but more like terror. The way we are to understand the verse stating that "there is no fear in love; for perfect love casts out fear" is that we should live in such an utterly abstract terror of God, as God's "love" is a love that would kill his innocent son—pouring out his fury—beating his son to a pulp. Yes, the crippling fear of this God casts out all other fears! I mean, who would fear being kidnapped, raped, and tortured by a psychopath when you fear the God who has people tortured in hell for all of eternity! Not only that, this God ordained most of humanity to be born for no other purpose than to be eternally tortured in hell simply to tickle his fancy—bringing himself glory. As John Piper claims, this God is the most self-centered being in existence and finds great pleasure in punishing those he determined to be totally depraved.
Yes, you really should be terrified of God. Remember those cursing psalms? Well, they all express righteous and godly anger. What is God's anger like? It is like hating someone so much that you wish evil upon their innocent wife and children. It is brutalizing the innocent for the deeds of the guilty--perfectly depicted in God brutalizing his son in a fit of rage. Yes, a prophet depicts God as a drunk who smites and slays people in a violent and drunken fury. Yes, be scared of this God! Jesus was fearful of this God, and that is why he was so afraid in the garden, he was anticipating the monstrous wrath of God that would find great pleasure in pulverizing him for what he did not do.
All the more reason to be terrified. God's name is Jealous. Whenever he gets jealous, he kills people in his vindictive rage (plenty of examples of this in the Old Testament). The author really get on a roll now; they present Ezekial 16 in all its sexually explicit glory. In this, Ezekial depicts God as an enraged husband, who takes his wife out, strips her naked in front of men, and hands her over to a mob--after they are through with her, his rage is finally appeased. Oh, the beautiful jealousy of God. How righteous and holy are God's ways! This is presented as an example of how it is right for husbands to be jealous of their wives (yet, inconsistently, unlike our godly model, the authors warn us against acting violently... I don't know why, in Hosea and Jeremiah, God is also presented as a husband who brutally murders his wife in a jealous rage). Yes, in light of God's "love" in the Old Testament, the fear of the lord is the only thing that makes sense! In light of the Old Testament narrative, which is such a tragedy, my heart breaks for Israel, I am like, don't do it, don't get in a relationship with YHWH. Please don't do it, run, run, run from this twisted psycho!!!! The poor Israelites would have been so much better off in slavery in Egypt. Instead, they get entangled with a diety that will fly into a rage and kill thousands over the drop of the hat. The book of Numbers presents God as an abusive narcissist with an extremely short fuse and uncontrollable rage. In the wilderness, if the story has them going without water for days, only to complain, YHWH will fly into a furious rage and kill thousands. After they question whether this God intends them good, this God promises to be their enemy and kill every one of them in the wilderness. It is incredible how the author of Numbers could present a God that was so unhinged, unreasonable, impatient, violent, over-the-top, and vindictive. These poor Jews had it so rough throughout their history, and they saw every bad thing that happened to be the direct wrath of God. Honestly, they would have been so much better off believing in several deities, some better and others worse.
No doubt, those who read my little summary of a few points in the book think I exaggerate. As I am listening to the audiobook, I cannot directly quote them. I wish I could, to illustrate how bad it actually is. Of course, I exaggerate a little. It truly is remarkable just how bad parts of this book are.