It's okay, though a pretentious take on the subject, as most of the public choice analysis comes down to "China does this because REASONS," while never giving empirical backing for its claims outside of anecdotal accounts. Once you parse away the economic anecdotes by Yonk, which are decent by themself, you're left with Yang's application, which most of the times, sounds like a China uncensored video but with none of the humor
My main problems that make me warn people not to read this book are the sources and the obvious falun gong bias from Yang.
The sources are just bad. They try to lead you to think that they use credable sources by using APA style and lots of Chinese language authors, but most of the times, the sources lead into columns and English language reports. The only sources they use from China are from state media in English, which is not good. Imagine writing a economic analysis of the US, but only citing Hungarian blog posts and voice of America for your background. That's basically how this book reads.
What's even worse is their treatment of falun gong. They have a whole page describing the cult as a "new religious movement," with all the flowery language of a progranda publication on them. They completely leave out the cults beliefs, or the fact many of their persecution claims were invented by the founder to peddle their religious system (such as the organ harvesting ring based on a traditional Chinese custom of assigning faith to organs, thus making falun gong supporters be attacked because they have the most profitable organs). I was really surprised the authors would do this, only to see that Yang was a regular pundit on New Tang Dynasty (a falun gong run media agency), and it became much less of a surprise.
Once again, I would avoid this book. The economic research is by the numbers, and the Chinese analysis is God awful. Just scroll through the news while reading mises, and it will serve you much better then this book.