This was a re-read of a book I first picked up many years ago, when I was ill and bored one weekend, aged 10. It wasn’t actually my book – it was my father’s – but back then I had a propensity to grab adult fiction, having exhausted all the children’s and teen’s books available to me. I was gripped by the hard hitting drama and tension of Escape – this was an action thriller I had never read the likes of before. In recent years I’ve seen the book catch a lot of flak for ‘not being as good as Whirlwind’ – Escape is a cut and edited version of Whirlwind – but I’d never read Whirlwind, Escape was my first introduction to Clavell’s books, and I have to admit I liked Escape and have always looked back on it with fondness. It was long overdue a re-read, so here I am.
Well, it’s still the fast-paced action thriller I remember. Nowadays one might call it high octane, and the action is certainly relentless. The strange thing is I didn’t enjoy it as much as I remember, I think because I can sense what was left out and cut. Some of the characters feel thinly sketched, as do certain plotlines, and I get the distinct sense that in Whirlwind these plots and characters must have been far more detailed and highly developed.
Context is also really important. For my younger self, Escape swept me off to a strange and distant place where shocking and dramatic things happened. For years afterwards I was fixated on the Iranian revolution. Now, as an adult, I have far more context, but I’m not sure if that makes the story more or less dramatic. As a child I didn’t have any idea of the awful things that were going to happen in this unfolding tale. As an adult I do, and I’m far more aware of the reasons behind them… but I’m also far more jaded and not surprised anymore by such things. I’m not sure if that added to or detracted from the drama of the story. What’s for sure is that I could see grim parallels with current events.
Clavell’s writing style is eminently suited to this kind of story. He writes in a rather utilitarian way that, whilst for me it’s light on character development, is detailed in description of environment and action. He also has a curious way of creating complex schemes from the characters that are delivered and explained in a surprisingly sparse and functional way. I have to say I remain unsatisfied with the characters, with their lack of depth and development. Their broad brushstrokes frustrated me, and whilst I may not have noticed this as a child, I’m far less willing to forgive it as an adult – the relentless action, the one-note characters, the unflagging male heroes. It’s strange; I was so looking forward to re-reading this, as in my memory it’s one of the greatest books I’ve read, but now I definitely wouldn’t rate it more than I have below. It’s almost enough to put me off reading any more of Clavell in future – but I sneaked a peak at the reviews for Whirlwind and the consensus seems to be that it was something of an aberration in Clavell’s Asian Saga and that the rest of his novels were much better. As such, I will give Clavell another go at some point, with one of his lauded efforts like Shogun or Gai-Jin, but if they prove to be just as functional and character-light I may have to call it quits with Clavell.
6 out of 10