This volume reviews many of the material errors made in Jimmy Carter's book and often repeated in interviews. It includes articles by a number of analysts with expertise in commenting on Carter s policies, statements and perspectives. Kenneth Stein, Dennis Ross, Michael Oren, Alan Dershowitz, Melvin Konner and Rachel Ehrenfeld each offer important insight about the former president's lamentable distortions. The book is an opportunity to restate essential facts and to underscore the need for reform of publishing houses, such as Simon and Schuster, that violate basic standards of accuracy, while promoting and profiting from such non-fiction books.
Falsehoods and More Falsehoods Andrea Levin, Gilead Ini, Alex Safian Ph.D., Tamar Sternthal Don't Play With Maps Dennis Ross Letter of Resignation from Carter Center Professor Kenneth Stein My Problem with Jimmy Carter's Book Professor Kenneth Stein Letter Declining Participation in Carter Advisory Group Melvin Konner, M.D., Ph.D. What's Jimmy Carter Afraid Of? Eleven Emory University Professors Why Won't Carter Debate His Book? Professor Alan Dershowitz A Religious Problem: Jimmy Carter s Book: An Israeli View Michael B. Oren Carter's Faith: Habitat for Hostility Dexter Van Zile Carter's Arab Financiers Rachel Ehrenfeld Ex-President For Sale Professor Alan Dershowitz Simon and Schuster Backs Carter's Falsehoods Andrea Levin
A review of Carter's book which mentions the many resignations from the Carter Center including its first director Professor Kenneth Stein. This book published by CAMERA has a detailed refutation of factual errors in the book. "As to why the ex-president harbors such extreme animus, many have noted his bias is consistent with longstanding and close friendships with Arab rulers, some of whom lavishly fund the Carter Center. (While Carter is relentless in scrutinizing and faulting Israel for its alleged infractions, his Center is virtually silent about the grave abuse of human rights in Arab states.) Likewise, commentators have considered the religious dimension of his own brand of Christianity and his apparent conflating of a particularly harsh and anti-Jewish interpretation of the Hebrew Bible with a jaundiced perspective on modern Israel." p. 3