Actual rating: 4,5.
This has waiting on my book shelf for years and years, because I was somehow convinced I'd already read it – but it turns out I hadn't. Congratulations to me! :D I wasn't even sure what it WAS – I think I might have thought it was all The Scruffians Project? – and was pretty delighted to realize it was collection of short stories. The first few pages are a bit of a struggle, before you settle back into the rythm of Duncan's prose. Then it's a wild, glorious ride of queer rebellion, and I love almost every single moment of it. It only took me so long to read because I'm way, way into Shameless and Gallavich right now, and have little enough time for anything not directly related to that.
”Sic Him, Hellhound! Kill! Kill!” was one of my favourites, in spite of me tending to choose vampires over werewolves at any given time. It made a decent case for the hounds... and any not-so-subtlle diss of Twilight is likely to make me giggle. The set-up is reminiscent of a/b/o dynamics and I'm even tempted to take it out for a spin in some unsuspecting fandom, because I think it would fucking FLY (buuuuut my relationship status with a/b/o is firmly stuck at ”it's complicated”, since I find it a little intriguing but mostly squicky, so well, I doubt it'll happen). It is also way more self-contained than any of the other stories – apart from the above-mentioned diss and the general nod to vampire/werewolf fictions, it doesn't overtly reference any other stories, penned by Duncan or anyone else. (Well. In Jared Swift one might see endlessly dying Thomas, but only if one is primed to latch on to any such potential references.)
The things is, Duncan is very, very good at grabbing hold of any and all myths, stories and what-not and use them for his own nefarious ends, more often than not changing out perspective of the original story. (It's reminiscent of Neil Gaiman, but on a whole 'noter level, and queer as fuck.) I absolutely love that – and it makes you feel clever, feel slightly smug that you understand what is going on here. Of course, when you stumble upon something you don't quite understand it all falls apart and might well leave you in a mighty sulk: theoretically I'm decently versed in both discourse theory and Greek mythology but ”The Shoulder of Pelops” left me absolutely cold. These are the Corona Days, and I'll have my Story with some sprinklings of Philosophy, please – not the other way around. Likewise, ”Bizzare Cubiques” had me unengaged.
But those were exceptions! For the most part, the stories were either something I liked (anything with the Scruffians, ”The Behold of The Eye,” which I HAD read before, and liked even then, ”Jack Scallyway”, ”The Origin of the Fiend”) or loved:
”Sons of the Law” was an absolute favourite, a Western reimagining of the Bible that felt like entirely appropriate reading on Holy Saturday. I didn't cotton on to what was going on until two and a half pages in – sloppy of me, given the apple reference and all – but when you do, you get both the happy feeling of being in on a joke, and the story (which I think DOES work as a piece of fiction all of its own, even if you're completely unfamiliar with the Bible) opens up in new, exciting ways. This, again, is Ducan's strenght: the reference to other works both strenghtens his own AND reshapes our understanding of the other. When it works, it is glorious. It probably helps if you naturally tend to vibe with Lucifer's rebellion over the Law of the Lord, but yeah.
Same goes for ”The Disappearance of James H--”. I love the original ”Peter Pan” story – the prose is fucking ace – and have, predictable soul that I am, always have a fondness for Captiain Hook. This manages to be very perfectly in character for Pan, and casts Hook in a new light. And it's not actually until the very end that I realize just what this work is a re-telling off, and then I go back an re-read all the very sly little references and ah, you are GOOD, Mr. Duncan.
I haven't actually read or seen ”The Tempest” and so probably miss whatever extra layers there's to be found in ”The Island of the Pirate Gods” (I recognize the names Ariel, Caliban, Prospero, and vaguely assosciate ”The Tempest” with the sea, but have no idea what they're up to in Shakespeare's work. Maybe someone is a wizard or a magician?) but that doesn't matter because JACK AND JOEY ARE BACK AND AT IT! Ungh. I, predictably enough, have always loved Joey (and even named one of my phones, a very cool looking thing, Joey Narcosis back in the days. Pro tip, kids, don't name a piece of equipment for the ultimate betrayer because that will not work out... ) and his and Jack's relationship was and remains my favourite part of ”The Book of All Hours”. And what do we get here if not a DAMNED JACK/JOEY/PUCK OT3 THING! :o Induced by love magic, but STILL! I need to lay down, I have too many feelings, this is a dream come true, and aaaaaah, I love these guys.
Ahem.
Given what I've just said, it should be no surprise that ”The Angel of Gamblers” work for me. I've read this one before, too; found, incidentally, during one of my frenzied hunts for whatever references to Joey Narcosis the web will offer. I am a simple soul and allow my fancies to take me where they will.
After a somewhat slow start ”Oneirica” reads to me like a supercondensed variant of ”The Book of All Hours”, with the Jack/Joey/Puck thing suggested in ”The Island of the Pirate Gods” pushed to the forefront, and yeah. Down for that. It also felt a little like coming home, very comforting – and tbh I kind of picked this collection up now because I really want to re-read Vellum and Ink but have apparently lent my copy of Vellum to some friend (note to self: stop letting people borrow my favourite books, I need to keep them at hand) and so I can't. :o Maybe I'll just jump straigt into Ink – which I like more anyway – but mm. I think I would like to have the whole experience. We shall see.