Subbu Publications have been on the forefront of publishing many books related to our Itihasas and Puranas. The Flag of Ananta is the latest offering which had piqued my curiosity after the recent launch. The first striking feature of the book is the classification as Indology which is a very welcome change as compared to Mythology as quoted for another book I am currently reading.
The Flag of Ananta is a Indology-fiction genre about the journey of a girl athlete, a journey of discovering our ancient roots through Ramayana. Like any modern child, she has her own apprehensions on Valmiki’s magnum opus whose secrets and riches are unravelled through some conversations and unique experiences. Unlike the other common books, the major character from Ramayana in this book is Sugreeva. The main protagonist has an astral travel experience where she comes face to face with Sugreeva and the rest of the book is about her journey where she has a ring-side view of Ramayana as it unfolds over the various kandas of Ramayana.
The author should be appreciated for integrating the various verses from Kishkinda, Sundara and Yuddha kandas along with geographical findings of the modern era which is still trying to explain some of the unique marks across the world like Paracas Candelabra. The author has also interspersed a tribute to Dr. Padmakar Vishnu Vartak whose astral travel experiences are legendary and definitely would appeal to the interest of readers.
In a very recent podcast, Anuradha Goyal ji mentioned that every character in Mahabharatha is named with a specific intent. I could relate to this anecdote when I read this book. I do feel that the name of the main character who is a martial artist, as Bhuvaneshwari is by design, inspired by Bhavani Devi, Gold medallist in fencing. Similarly, the journalist Neeta Prakash is perhaps inspired by the ace journalist Smita Prakash. Each of the characters are quite well brought out (albeit with a one specific observation) and their conversations are quite illuminating.
I do have a couple of observations about few aspects of the book. First, the character of the father is mentioned in only 2 places. I feel that the author could have fleshed this out a little better and could have employed the character to further the narrative with his own unique perspectives.
Next, the book mentions that Ramayana occurred 14000 years ago. This specific dating could be quite contentious as various texts have varied interpretation. While we do have a concept of recurring Ramayana across Manvantharas, Devi Bhagwatha Mahapurana has a specific time line for Vaivaswata Manvnathara i.e. 19th Chatur Yuga, which is a long time back as we are in 28th Chatur Yuga now.
S.D.B. 4.16.14
yugē caikōna vinśēStha trētākhyē bhagavan hariḥ jamadagnīsutō jātō rāmō nāma mahabalaḥ
S.D.B 4.16.19
trētayugē raghōrvanśō rāmō daśarathātmajaḥ
Even if we consider 28th CY, the duration of Dwapara is 2000 Deva Varusham which again a large spectrum of time. I do understand that there are different schools of thought, but I am referring to the ones from our Puranas.
Lastly, I personally wasn’t very happy about generalising the Vanaras as forest dwelling tribes who wore masks and tails as appendages as part of appearance. While this could indeed be true, I refer to the original Valmiki Ramayana. In the first sarga of Kishkinda Kanda, the great Rsi has written
तौ ऋष्यमूकस्य समीप चारी चरन् ददर्श अद्भुत दर्शनीयौ |
शाखा मृगाणाम् अधिपः तरस्वी वितत्रसे नैव चिचेष्ट चेष्टाम् || ४-१-१२८
स तौ महात्मा गज मन्द गामि शखा मृगः तत्र चिरन् चरन्तौ |
दृष्ट्वा विषादम् परमम् जगाम चिन्ता परीतो भय भार मग्नः || ४-१-१२९
शाखा मृगाणाम् - Translates to the ones on the branches of trees, which is Monkeys. I personally believe that Ramayana is from an era where Monkeys were as evolved and knowledgeable as humans. I am highlighting these aspects as the book shouldn’t lead to a dilution of the original epic. Like how the guiding characters of the book emphasise repeatedly, one should learn from the originals.
These minor aspects aside, this book is a VERY GOOD read. If we can love Da Vinci code, I feel there is a much richer, more nuanced imagination about our ancient knowledge systems in this book. This is VERY HIGHLY RECOMMENDED book. Kudos to Subbu for the fine quality of the book too !!!