Yesterday's Houses by Mavis Cheek is a classic Cheek comedy of manners that will delight her many fans. From the bestselling author of Janice Gentle Gets Sexy and Mrs Fytton's Country Life comes a tragicomic tale of one woman's journey to independence via seven houses, three men and many disappointments...
Born in Wimbledon, now part of London, Mavis left school at 16 to do office work with Editions Alecto, a Kensington publishing company. She later moved to the firm's gallery in Albemarle Street, where she met artists such as David Hockney, Allen Jones, Patrick Caulfield and Gillian Ayres. In 1969 she married a "childhood sweetheart", Chris Cheek, a physicist, whom she had met at a meeting of the Young Communist League in New Malden, but they separated three years later. Later she lived for eleven years with the artist Basil Beattie. She returned to education in 1976, doing a two-year arts course at Hillcroft College, a further education college for women.
Although Cheek had planned to take a degree course, she turned instead to fiction writing while her daughter, Bella Beattie, was a child. She moved from London to Aldbourne in the Wiltshire countryside in 2003, but as she explained to a newspaper, "Life in the city was a comparative breeze. Life in the country is tough, a little bit dangerous and not for wimps."
Cheek has been involved with the Marlborough LitFest, and also teaches creative writing. This has included voluntary work at Holloway and Erlstoke prisons. As she described in an article: "What I see [at Erlstoke] is reflected in my own experience. Bright, overlooked, unconfident men who are suddenly given the opportunity to learn grow wings, and dare to fail. It helps to be able to tell them that I, too, was once designated thick by a very silly [education] system. My prisoners have written some brilliant stuff, and perhaps it gives them back some self-esteem."
This book tells the story of the life of Marianne, which unfortunately is entirely uninteresting. Marianne keeps marrying men she doesn’t really love,and buying houses she doesn’t really want, and which need a good deal of doing up. I think we are meant to sympathise with her troubles with men and houses,but I just found them irritating. She has a daughter and, we are told, ‘puts her life on hold’ to raise her. A very strange expression I have always thought. What are children, if not life? I simply didn’t care what happened to Marianne, or her houses, or her men. Then she becomes a writer, and has some success writing novels, which I hope are more interesting than this one is.
At times really funny but the ending is quite tedious and I wondered about the point of it beyond showcasing multiple references to various classical books / their characters. My reaction to the main character’s choices shifted between sympathy and exasperation as she repeated the same mistakes on and on. Her relationship with her daughter felt underdeveloped as if the only true connection she made with the world was via her husbands / lover. Jean was a great character and so was Willa. I would love the latter to reappear at the end. Overall, good writing, amusing observations but something major not working in the story.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
I was enjoying this book until about three-quarters of the way through when she started to ramble and lose the plot!! It's really a shame as although it was definitely chick-lit it was an interesting story and gave a different point of view from the usual happy ever after type of book.
The novel follows Marianne from her teens to her middle years, with each chapter starting with the estate agent’s details of the house she was living in. Her goal in life is simple but elusive: her dream is to have a lovely bathroom.
I loved the earlier part of the book , with the fashions and mores of the Sixties and, although quite disturbing at times, it’s often really funny.
As a working class girl who left school to get a job, Marianne is looked down on by her posh husband and his circle, who think she’s thick because she hasn’t read the ‘right’ books. Her answer is to assimilate and read those books and believe that makes her a better person, till she’s referring to everyone in the flats behind her house as ‘proles’.
The disappointing thing about Yesterday’s Houses is that there’s no resolution.
I did not really enjoy this book, I kept hoping it would get better but it didn’t. The main character, Marianne Flowers, was a naive, unworldly and a rather insipid woman. She made bad choices in men, and also in the houses she bought and lived in. She aspired to be a better person, and dreamed of a lovely home with a lovely bathroom, which she never seemed to get. She did go to college, got an education, became a mother and then a successful author.
2.5 stars. Mavis Cheek wrote one of my favourite books so I was excited to finally find another book by her but it was quite disappointing. Marianne was, for the vast majority of the book, a frustrating and unlikable character. This made it seem like the story just went on and on and on even though it was only 263 pages.
A woman’s place is in the home – or not as the case may be. This book by Cheek challenges overriding notions of what it is to be female and to be connected to homes, families and the world. I must admit I was surprised to read that other reviewers on here would (and do!) describe this book as chick-lit. I personally hate the aforesaid genre (so much so that I won’t speak its name again for a while) and find this book anything but. Feminist fiction – yes definitely – but the other, well no. Cheek’s writing style is very jaunty and satirical but she does seem to understand the darker menaces of womanhood and femininity issues very clearly within the timeframe of a British sixties to eighties emancipation. Each London property that features in the narrative has its own distinct personality and character and influences directly the mental state, physical relationships and wellbeing of the protagonist Marianne. Drawing to the end of the book, she breaks some of the shackles of the housing/relationship conundrum and lives her life in more relative liberty as a freer and happier woman. In essence, this book is all about feminism and the interspersed links to feminists and feminist authors carry on a theme of liberty, release and ground-breaking as the novel progresses. Cheek has her own particular take on male characterisation during the novel but ultimately the men portrayed live much freer lives and are less ‘chained’ to circumstances and physical surroundings throughout the work (although they often 'bodge' them up). As my first introductory read of Cheek, I have been very pleased. I love her methodology of tackling quite dark and challenging subject matter via tongue in ‘Cheek’ prose (sorry couldn’t resist that one). That said, this is still a book that I would happily pass on to male readers so they will be able to enjoy too the comic and clever humour. Great book and I look forward to reading the author again. Recommended!
Excellent book, unputdownable. I brought this on a whim in a quaint little coffee shop one day and all the way home was hooked to the pages. Each one was creatively and sensuously written yet informative as it travels through a young woman's learnings of the people and places around her. Most enjoyable.
I enjoyed this book. Although I found Marianne a bit irritating I felt i could relate to her as she was of my era. It may be hard for younger readers to understand how much women's lives did depend on the men in their lives during the 60's and 70's.
What a wimp didnt gel with Marianne at all, reckon it was supposed to be funny too but missed it. I did hope she ended up in a nice house but we will never know