Incredible book by Kenya Hara on his design philosophy informed by Zen and Japanese tradition, work at MUJI, how Japan relates to the rest of the world, harmony with nature, and modernism.
He is a designer that loves the color white, values emptiness and simplicity, and isn't interested in making things that turn heads. He wants to reveal the beauty in the mundane, and improve people's everyday lives in small ways. Contrasted with Western individuality and boldness, his approach appears understated, but is no less meaningful.
At MUJI, they want to make things that make people go, "that'll do"—but offer the highest level of quality that still elicits this content acceptance. He argues this gives a degree of freedom not available to those steeped in Western thought of always trying to buy things that stand out. When a creation doesn't stand out as much and serves as an empty vessel, it leaves room for it to adapt to a variety of environments and lifestyles, room for people to add meaning of their own.
There is an element of playfulness in his ideas, because he is willing to take something familiar and change it up slightly such that it provokes inspiration or thought. With his haptic explorations, he is interested in appealing to our senses to push the range of communication done through design. He reminds me that we don't have to look far, or do something radically different, to create beauty.
The book contains lots of images and design inspiration, could serve as a coffee table book even if you don't read any of the text. Interestingly, doesn't provide a lot of background about his life or career, which I was hoping to learn. I guess he wanted to focus more on his ideas than his life, which I can respect.
Favorite quotes:
"I have long thought that raising questions is more important than giving answers. Creativity is to discover a question that has never been asked. If one brings up an idiosyncratic question, the answer he gives will necessarily be unique as well."
"We don't want to be the thing that kindles or incites intense appetite, causing outbursts like, "This is what I really want," or "I simply must have this." If most brands are after that, MUJI should be after its opposite. We want to give customers the kind of satisfaction that comes out as "this will do," not "this is what I want." It's not appetite, but acceptance. Even within acceptance, however, there is an appropriate level. Our goal is to elevate it as high as is possible."
"The wellspring of MUJI design has nothing to do with fashion or the mood of the day. Our target is neither youth nor age. We don't pay any more attention than necessary leading technology. The ethos of MUJI is interest in people. Our concern is for those who work and rest, sharing the planet of today: people who create their living space with realistic expectations, have fun with their attire, eat safe food, sleep, go on a trip now and then, face the usual ups and downs, laughter and tears-ordinary people. MUJI's role, accomplished through more than 7,000 MUJI products, is to continue to help people have a life that's a little happier each day."
"Since ancient times, the Japanese have believed that wisdom resides in nature and human beings live by basking in the wisdom of nature. This differs from the Western conceptual climate, which posits wisdom on the part of human beings and states that nature, an undomesticated wilderness, should be controlled by human intellect."
(on identities designed for popularity) "[Y]ou can tackle its maturity and tranquility head on, and even after these have fermented to perfection, you don't have to advertise it to the public, just leave it in its isolation, in the depths of the forest, beyond the wisps of rising mist. Anything that is superb will be discovered, without fail. Identity is that sort of power, and should certainly become a great source of communication."
"Constantly pushing the era forward isn't always progress. We stand between the future and the past. I wonder if we could discover a key to our creativity not in that far-off target at which all of society stares so intently, but rather in the extension of a vision that looks right through society from the past. The future lies ahead of us, but behind us there is also a great accumulation of history-a resource for imagination and creativity. I think we call "creative" that dynamism of intellectual conception that flows back and forth between the future and the past."
"All design thought, whether of Ruskin and Morris or of the Bauhaus, has had a socialistic tint. Both Ruskin and Morris abhorred being controlled by an economy in which making things was synonymous with machine production, and because the birth of the Bauhaus was enabled by the social-democratic government in Weimar, it can be said that the social-democratic trend fostered the Bauhaus way of thinking. Basically, the concept of design was conceived and developed in no small measure on the premise of idealistic social ethics. Now, within the intense magnetic field of economic principle, the purer the concept, the less able it is to live up to its ideal."
"Design is not the act of amazing an audience with the novelty of forms or materials; it is the originality that repeatedly extracts astounding ideas from the crevices of the very commonness of everyday life."
"The projects I've been involved in are like ball games of all sorts. If I liken them to tennis, it's as if a succession of top players were making strong returns of every subtle serve I had made on the corner. I return the ball too, and it takes yet another subtle course. This is how HAPTIC, RE-DESIGN and other such projects have come to be."
"We used to fill our imaginations with the glamour of achieving happiness by sending a virtual self to live in cyberspace, but we've realized that virtual happiness cannot become real happiness ... And so I wonder, in this context, if there may be something yet dormant in our sensory perceptions, an undiscovered American Continent of the senses. Has no one begun the work of exploring this undiscovered continent on the world atlas of the senses?"
(on art vs. design) "Art is an expression of an individual's will to society at large, one whose origin is very much of a personal nature. So only the artist knows the source of his own work. This loftiness is what makes art so cool. Design, on the other hand, is basically not self-expression. Instead, it originates in society. The essence of design lies in the process of discovering a problem shared by many people and trying to solve it."
"Any example of ornamentation or decoration from another Asian region will reveal dense, elaborate details. On the opposite end of the scale is the Japanese concept of contentment with simplicity and emptiness. … Perhaps our ancestors came up with the idea of stopping them all in their tracks, negating them with the utmost simplicity: zero. They must have arrived at the sensibility of balancing everything with nothingness."
"Look at the big picture and work on the task at hand."