Book annotation not available for this .Word Biblical .Lane, William .Thomas Nelson Inc..Publication .1992/02/01..Number of ...Binding .HARDCOVER..Library of .81071768
About a year and a half ago my New Testament Greek for Beginners Support Group was translating Hebrews. I found it to be tough going. I checked out this book to assist me. Some books in this series go through the Greek line-by-line, and I was disappointed that this one didn’t. So I returned it to the library unread. Recently I read Henry Alford's commentary on Hebrews and it occurred to me that this commentary might make a good companion to his. So I got it again with the intention of completing the translation I started a year and a half ago but never completed.
I really enjoyed the introduction. Lane talks a lot about literary forms of criticism, such as discourse analysis and rhetorical criticism. I took a special effort to see how Lane's interest in these forms of criticism would play out in his commentary. In fact, I noticed them playing a pretty significant role. Since these types of criticism are new to me, I don’t know if Lane is paying attention to these elements over and above other commentators or whether I just haven’t really noticed it before.
Despite the fact that there was no line-by-line analysis of the Greek, I nevertheless found the commentary helpful for doing a translation, especially the textual notes. One thing I did not like was that the way he divided the pericopes up. Some of the sections were quite lengthy, with the textual footnotes sometimes numbering as many as three dozen or more. The fact that the print was smaller in these sections made it quite fatiguing on the eyes, sometimes necessitating taking a break in reading. I’ve noticed that quite a number of reviewers complain about the format of the WBC series. Perhaps this is one feature they are complaining about.
In any case William Lane is an excellent scholar and makes many interesting points. One point of interest that I found fascinating was his idea that the letter to the Hebrews was written to a small house church with no more than 20 people. Wouldn’t that be something? That would mean a document with such a humble beginning came to play a huge role in the development of Christian thought.
The first commentary I've read, cover to cover. Technical, clear, and perfect for my Theological questions. Similarly written to papers I read in high academia.
Excellent commentary that provides thorough sourcing and treatment of alternate interpretations and applications. I am looking forward to reading volume 2.
This was not the best commentary I've ever read, but it was pretty decent. I think the entire Word Biblical Commentary series is pretty difficult reading, and the only one I'd ever say I "enjoyed" was Gordon Wenham's 2 volumes on Genesis.
Anyway, Lane does a fair job commenting on Hebrews 1-8 in this volume. I skipped all of the verse-by-verse comments, since I felt like he zoomed in a bit too much and lost the author's flow of thought. However, his sections on "Form/structure/setting" and "Explanation" for each section were very worthwhile.
It's hard for me to separate what I've learned from Hebrews from what I learned from Lane's commentary. So, I'll just write briefly what I've learned from Hebrews (that Lane helped me with).
I look to so many things to fulfill me, when Jesus is really all I need. I often look to my work, books, acceptance from peers, and even my marriage to make me feel valuable. However, the main point of Hebrews is that Jesus is the final revelation of God. Jesus is all we need to be accepted by God. Jesus is far better than any outward religion, particularly the shadows of Judaism. If Jesus is enough, then I can be honest about my sin and failure!
Jesus is fully God and fully man. Jesus is the one who leads us into his rest. Jesus is the great high priest who ministers in the heavenly tabernacle, offering himself once for all. He ever lives to intercede for us.
I don't need any other mediator to bring me God's acceptance.
Detailed and technical. His summaries in the explanation section are useful for sermon prep. I'm finding Bruce, O'Brien, and Guthrie more useful, but Lane should be consulted in tandem if you're preaching through Hebrews (and perhaps Ellingsworth too). Unless you know Greek, the explanation section is where you'll mostly hangout.