Thank you to #NetGalley and Andrews McMeel Publishing for providing me a copy of Pierre Alex Jeanty’s, What I Should’ve Texted, in exchange for an honest review.
#WhatIShouldveTexted is not only the first poetry collection that I have read by the poet, but also is one of only a handful of contemporary poetry collections that I have read by anyone. Despite my preference for older works, the concept immediately grabbed me and I needed see the execution.
The collection is divided into three sections that each begin with the original text message, which serves as the template for single-page poems that fill the remainder of each section and expand upon the original text. The font is bolded for the initial texter. That bolded message becomes the title of a poem. The message from the responder is italicized and is the conclusion of a poem. The subtext or “what the texter should have said” is the poem between the two.
This collection is clearly written from personal experience. Thus, I do not want to tear apart verses that are fragile and hold so much meaning for their creator. Instead, I will state the positives including the format, the fact that the poetry rhymes, and the collection improves with each section. These works may be more effective as slam poetry spoken by the author as opposed to written verse.
As an aside, while not unique to the author or this collection, it is bizarre to see digital references, such as #emojis or #Facebook, in poetry. The author incorporates them seamlessly thanks to the ingenuous format.
The one critique, which can be resolved with minor edits, is that some language is too repetitive throughout a particular section. Certain passages should either be omitted or changed, assuming the omission or change would leave the integrity of a division intact.