The Constant Two Plan: Reforming the Electoral College to Account for the National Popular Vote

by Jay Wendland

Since established by the Founding Fathers, the Electoral College was designated to be appoint the president to ensure that the voting process was anti-majoritarian in nature. However, with the advancements of technology allowing for a meaningful and engaged popular vote to ensure the U.S. is led by a president who received the most votes, the Founders concerns about the inability for the country to run a meaningful nationwide election are no longer relevant, leaving room for change. In The Constant Two Reforming the Electoral College to Account for the National Popular Vote, Jay Wendland explores a novel approach to reforming the Electoral College to allocate for two electoral votes per state alongside the votes from the American public in order to bring the American presidential election process more in line with democratic norms and principles. Wedland demonstrates that the major extant reform plans in place would perform worse than the existing system and a new idea is needed. The Constant Two Plan remedies the small state bias, ensuring the popular vote winner becomes president, and acknowledges the federalist principle many have come to associate with the Electoral College.

210 pages, Hardcover

Published April 5, 2024

Reviews

[Hella · Rating 4 out of 5]

This book is a thorough and well-researched analysis of the Electoral College. It gives a detailed account of the process by which the founders arrived at it in 1787, how it has performed in each presidential election since then, and the numerous and varied attempts to reform it (starting not long after it was conceived).
Wendland clearly lays out the shortcomings of each of the previous proposals to remedy or replace the Electoral College before putting forth his own recommendation for reform. I found it to be a very compelling read; its only weak point is a tendency to reiterate information from previous chapters.