2022 Reading
There is an unmistakable elegance to Todd McGowan's argument in The Racist Fantasy. As McGowan explains in the introduction to The Racist Fantasy: "The book aims to explore the psychic resonance racism has. To do so, it will consider the role that the unconscious plays in racism. What is unconscious about racism is not its destructiveness or its unjustness but the way that it produces enjoyment for the racist" (1). To understand why someone embraces racism, we must reckon with the ways in which racism produces enjoyment for the racist in question. Here McGowan uses terms like enjoyment in distinctly psychoanalytic ways. For psychoanalysis, enjoyment is complex, but it relates to equally important concepts such as deferment, fantasy, the barrier, and lack.
For the racist, the racial other is the site of an excessive pleasure the racist cannot access. This assumption is the racist fantasy incarnate. However, and McGowan is quite clear on this point, the racial other possesses nothing of unique significance. Or, to say this better, the racial other is a confluence of lack and excess, just like the racist. But as McGowan sees it, for racism to persist, the racist must assume the racial other has something the racist does not (i.e., excess without lack). McGowan writes, "While racist ideology can give those invested in it a certain symbolic status and a sense of superiority associated with that, it does not provide enjoyment. Racist ideology gives those invested in it a sense of identity, a sense of belonging that the racial other doesn't have, but identity alone is not enough to ensure capitulation. This is why a racist fantasy is necessary to supplement it. Fantasy supplies the enjoyment that ideology leaves to the side. It explains racism's psychic resonance in a way that racist ideology alone cannot" (4). The fantasy here is the assumption that the racial other pulled a fast one on the racist in question.
For example, consider Donald Trump's assertion that Mexico neglects to "send its best." In total, this is what Trump said, "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best... They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists." Even though this seems absurd, for psychoanalysis, it makes some sense. For Trump, if you are a hard-working, white American, you suffer (i.e., lack) at the expense of the racial other's excess. But what figures like Trump fail to see are the ways in which the framing of their lack is, itself, excessive. If McGowan has just one point he wants his reader to know, it is this; we are figures of lack and excess, and we experience this lack and excess concurrently. To think otherwise is to chart a path to the racist fantasy, at least from a formal perspective.
This is also why facts fail to dissuade the racist. What McGowan articulates in The Racist Fantasy is the importance of reckoning with the unconscious. As McGowan states, "People enjoy at odds with how they know" (8). The unconscious has no room for facts, and it cares not for facts. To some degree, this is because the unconscious knows before we do, at least in our conscious minds. McGowan writes, "The unconscious acts ahead of our knowledge and becomes visible through its acts...we act out the unconscious that we cannot avow to ourselves" (9).
McGowan's solution is, again, a simple but elegant one: reject inclusion. What McGowan means is incredibly important. He writes, "No amount of inclusion can ever go far enough to erase the distinction between friend and enemy, a distinction that provides the basis for the racist fantasy" (182). For McGowan, a term like "inclusion" is too affirmative yet ironically exclusionary. That is to say, we would do better if we recognized the lack we all share. This is a lack that is both singular and universal, which is to say, it belongs to us as individuals and as a collective. No one ever belongs because true belonging is impossible. Instead, we are all subjects of non-belonging. McGowan writes, "No matter what its content, every fantasy seeks out the structural position of nonbelonging in order to find the enjoyment that it accesses. That is the great formal lesson of fantasy" (183).
As long as we assume someone fails to belong in ways we cannot, racism will persist. For McGowan, subjects (i.e., all of us) must "confront their own nonbelonging and the enjoyment that comes with it" (176). He continues, "Until the association of the racial other with unlimited enjoyment breaks down, racism will continue to have a structuring role in the social order and anyone thrust into the position of the racial other will remain in danger" (176). To end racism, we must end the structure and form particular instances of racism assume. Far too often, we fixate on racism's content (e.g., Trump's Mexican immigrant comment or, frankly, almost anything the man said in the past few years), which is why we stumble. To end racism, we must illuminate the form racism takes, not the content housed within a particular form.
***
2024 Reading (NOTE: For this reading, I only read the introduction and the first and final chapters).
Main Argument
1. Racism is the manifestation of fantasy. That is to say, the racist finds enjoyment (in the psychoanalytic sense) from erecting a barrier to an object of desire, and the racial other functions as that barrier. For McGowan, racism is structural. Therefore, to understand all forms of racism, we must understand the psychic structure of the racist fantasy.
2. We can break from the racist fantasy by understanding the ubiquity of lack. That is to say, “enjoyment derives from lack,” and this is something the racial other has but not exclusively (184). All subjects lack, and we must recognize ourselves as lacking. To disrupt the racist fantasy, we must understand that we already have what we attribute to the racial other exclusively.
Supporting Arguments
Introduction: Hiding the Unconscious
1. Racism is an excess that offers enjoyment to the subject.
2. On the importance of fantasy and enjoyment: “Racism occurs through a fantasy structure that delivers enjoyment to the racist” (3).
3. While racism is also an ideology and mode of production (e.g., capitalism), it cannot provide enjoyment. Fantasy is necessary for enjoyment.
4. The fantasy element of racism remains unconscious. McGowan writes, “The unconscious investment is the central pillar of racism’s intransigence” (5).
5. On the psychic benefits of racism: “If racism didn’t deliver some psychic benefit or satisfaction, no one would be a racist, no matter what their history or material situation” (6).
6. This is an excellent description of the Freudian unconscious: “The unconscious acts ahead of our knowledge and becomes visible through its acts, which is why other people can see our unconscious more clearly than we do” (9).
7. In many ways, this is McGowan’s thesis: “People have a bias in their knowledge because of racism; racism is not a result of a bias in their knowing. To find the root of racism we must look not at mistakes in knowing but at successes in enjoying” (11-12). RACISM —> BIAS not BIAS —> RACISM
8. In summary, “Racism remains intractable as long as it remains enjoyable” (12).
Chapter 1: The Racist Fantasy
1. Fantasy requires the obstacle or barrier for enjoyment to appear: “The fantasy creates desirability through the erection of the obstacle” (14).
2. In McGowan’s “racist fantasy,” the racial other operates as the barrier to the object (perhaps the object of desire?).
3. In the racist fantasy, the racial other creates value for the subject.
4. Regarding enjoyment: “Enjoyment is always tied to an absence, not a presence” (16).
5. Fantasy has the effect of changing any object. For example, “Fantasy renders ordinary objects into objects of desire by making them obtainable. This is its magic act, which it performs through the obstacle” (19). Furthermore, “through fantasy, one can imagine an enjoyment without lack, but this is possible only via the creation of an obstacle that bears responsibility for the failure to attain this enjoyment” (20).
6. Regarding desire: “The failure of desire to find the perfect object is its mode of satisfaction” (20).
7. We must reckon with how the racist sees themselves relative to the racial other: “The subject of the racist fantasy believes itself to be a victim” (22).
8. The racist fantasy offers an explanation or narrative for “the tedium of people’s lives” (23).
9. In simplest terms, the racist fantasy is “parasitic” because he finds enjoyment in the obstacle, not the object.
10. It is important to remember that while these racist fantasies exist within individual psyches, they are best understood as a “collective fantasy” (27).
11. Regarding the marginalization of the Black man in the racist fantasy: “The ostracized position that the Black man occupies enables him to be the site of enjoyment in the fantasy” (29).
12. When considering the racist fantasy, we are considering form over content: “The point for both [the antisemite and the White racist] is to discover an unrestrained enjoyment that they cannot have without the racial other. They look to this other for what they believe they cannot have themselves” (30). Furthermore, “The racist fantasy is a form that can accommodate different contents” (34).
13. But none of this suggests that we should try to free ourselves from fantasy. Instead, we should recognize “that the obstacle is the source of enjoyment rather than a hindrance to it” (36). Furthermore, “When one sees the racist fantasy as a form, one can strip the racism away from it and enjoy without relying on the racial other as an obstacle” (37).
14. We suffer enjoyment.
15. In many ways, the construction of the racial other “lies in attributing one’s enjoyment to the racial other and to excuse the subject from responsibility for its own enjoyment” (39).
16. But the appeal of the racist fantasy is enjoyment without suffering: “The racist fantasy has such a lasting appeal because it promises enjoyment without suffering” (41).
17. Enjoyment always operates as a violation of norms because “even if it violates the norm by adhering to it too enthusiastically. The suffering that it produces stems from going too far” (44). In effect, we must accept the suffering of our enjoyment. That is the ethical choice.
18. It is important to remember that while the racist fantasy operates through individuals, it is a social phenomenon: “The racist fantasy is a shared social structure rather than the product of the derangement of certain individuals” (45).
Chapter 6: On the Other Side of Fantasy
1. So, how do we fix the problem of the racist fantasy? According to McGowan, it “involves taking responsibility for one’s own enjoyment rather than continuing to enjoy through the racial other. This is the fundamental antiracist gesture: enjoying one’s own nonbelonging instead of the nonbelonging of the racial other” (168). McGowan continues, “Whenever one is enjoying, one has responsibility for this enjoyment, no matter where it might seem to emanate from” (173). Furthermore, “Rather than attributing this excessive enjoyment to the racial other, subjects must confront their own nonbelonging and the enjoyment that comes with it” (176).
2. McGowan explores an interesting and important question regarding fantasy: why does a class fantasy not exist? He writes, “We identify with the symbolic position of the wealthy rather than fantasizing about their enjoyment…Identification secures our symbolic identity, enabling us to have a sense of who we are in our society and to convince ourselves that we really have a place within the society through identification with them” (180). In short, “It is the figure of nonbelonging who has access to enjoyment that the billionaire doesn’t” (181).
3. According to McGowan, “Equality can only be equality through the collective failure to belong…We cannot get to universal nonbelonging directly” (183). He continues, “No matter what its content, every fantasy seeks out the structural position of nonbelonging in order to find the enjoyment that it accesses” (183).
4. This quote places a fine point on McGowan’s overarching claim: “Embracing one’s nonbelonging involves seeing the nonbelonging that one attributes to the racial other in oneself” (190).
Sources
Sigmund Freud, Jacques Lacan, Frantz Fanon, Achille Mbembe, David Eng, Shinhee Han, Slavoj Zizek, Jennifer Friedlander.
Methods and Influences
Psychoanalysis, Critical Theory.
Questions
None.
Notes and Quotes
Read David Eng and Shinhee Han, Racial Melancholia, Radical Dissociation
Read Sheldon George, Trauma and Race
Quote: “The structure of fantasy necessarily focuses on the obstacle” (15).