Jung vs. Borg: How to Maintain the Deeply Human in the Age of AI
Glen Slater’s new book, “Jung vs. Borg”, is a must read for anyone interested in a comprehensive look at the full horizon the current rush to AI is beginning to initiate.
Slater’s overriding thesis is a stark one: that the devastation inflicted on the natural world by the (ongoing) industrial revolution is now, in the 21st century, being directed on our inner environment -- our selves, our souls, our psyches. Take your pick. Slater describes the current state of “attention capitalism” -- the curating our desires and preferences on behalf of corporate entities – as only the beginning of a much larger project, viz., the transformation of the human being from a biologically embodied organism to some kind of cyborg hybrid (“borg” being the shortened form of cyborg in the book’s title). AI, of course, is seen providing the quantum leap from the present to this messianic and utopian fusion of technology and the human substrate. See Musk, Zuckerberg, Theil – and Trump the enabler -- et al for details.
Slater is no luddite regarding AI and related technologies. AI is going to play a huge role in humanity’s future. But Slater sees our society as moving towards the techno-future in a state of psychological dissociation (numbness, fragmentation). Slater, however, offers a potential antidote to this state of dissociation. Drawing heavily on the insights of Archetypal (Jungian) psychology, he shows how depth psychology, the history of myth, and even popular culture, provide both cautions and guidance – guardrails, if you will – for how to proceed down this complex “borgian” path.
“Jung vs. Borg” is not a quick or easy read. But Slater writes in a style that is not only clear and engaging but also fueled by his passionate conviction that we must maintain and deepen our contact with the mythic imagination, which is the source of the deeply human. With this comment in mind, I’d like to close this review by sharing a very short dream that I had while reading Slater’s book. The dream is very simple: I dream I’m reading a “Tarzan” comic book.
“Tarzan”? Really.
But when I looked at the dream the symbolism quickly became clear: "Tarzan" is a highly civilized man, Lord Greystoke, who moves back down (sic) into such a primal level of embodiedness that his full title is, as everyone knows, “Tarzan of the apes”. “Tarzan”, in other words, symbolizes the movement in exactly the opposite direction of the idealized AI cyborg composites envisioned by the messianic trans-humanists described in “Jung vs. Borg”. Tarzan’s movement towards a more primal embodiment, however, would seem to symbolize exactly what is needed if we are to welcome our AI future creatively, that is, with a truly human balance between our embodied selves and our soon-to-be acquired AI selves.
Bottom line: read Slater’s book. It’s a guide to embracing a fully human future, a future that refuses to abandon the human body.