BEWARE: SPOILERS AHEAD!
Yay. Another terrible book in the 39 Clues series. I honestly don't understand why Scholastic couldn't have made Into the Gauntlet the last book (of course, with some Amian added in to make it canon). But no, they find random unknown authors to write some angsty nonsensical action romance drama, further deteriorating the 39 Clues canon. And worse, THERE'S NO HOPE FOR AMIAN!
The Good:
...I'm drawing a blank here. Time to go look through the book again...
1) The hacker subplot.
Both April May and Pony are relatively intriguing characters, and the similarities between them are striking. Like, they both drink Electroshock Cherry Limeade in mass quantities, which I now really want to try even though it's probably harmful for your health. Pony does seem incredibly naive for a hacker, though, so I can't see things ending well for him, but there seems to be a possibility that April May just might switch sides... then again, she might totally exploit Pony's naivete and destroy the Cahills, not that I would really mind at this point. But of course, things will obviously go right because the Cahills are so perfect (not). But things seriously do always work out for them in the end.
2) Nellie as a scientist.
It'll be interesting to see how long she can keep on sounding intelligent and retain her head scientist position. Avogadro's law, Eppendorf tubes, and neutrinos are high school chemistry stuff that I'm learning right now, not "science gibberish".Impressive, "Dr. Gormey." (Now I'm starting to feel some sympathy for Nellie, though, because chemistry is HARD and I'm starting to wish moles were only animals.) Also, why would the scientists start putting sodium in everything just because Nellie said so? It's a highly reactive alkali metal that can explode beakers if you put it in water, but who knows... maybe those scientists zoned out in chemistry class too.
3) IAN KABRA!
He can obviously never stop being amazing. Ian is maybe the only constant good thing that's been a part of the series from the beginning. I wish he would stop pining after Amy, though. She's too far gone since she's obviously obsessed with Jake's "big stupid face that looks like it's carved out of marble" (this is a legit quote, guys!) and is having some... issues. Like, serious issues. But wait! "Amy's heart ached as Ian looked at her across the runway." ...fine, that quote might have been taken out of context, so Amy doesn't actually like Ian in that way. Not that she deserves him anymore. It's weird because I sort of ship Amian but I also sort of don't. To phrase that better, I ship old Amy with Ian because new Amy has horrible judgment and is rather irrational.
Wow.... even "The Good" section is filled with negatives.
The Bad:
1) Jake.
He's a non-endearing jerk (Ian is the endearing one), but he's perfect for Amy *gasp* (more on that later). And guess what? Amy thinks he has a "big stupid face that looks like it's carved out of marble" (sorry, but I'm not going to get tired of quoting that any time soon). HER EXACT WORDS!
2) Amy.
Yes, our beloved, shy and stuttering heroine from the first series is now a stubborn, irrational, and boy-crazy mess. She pretty much thinks everything is of great significance and overreacts. Example: Your brother has a flier for a clown school in his bag, which you just happened to be snooping inside. If you're Amy, to you, this must be a true sign of the ultimate betrayal on his part, and you're not the betrayer at all for distrusting your own brother so much that you have to rummage through his things. Dan and Amy's sibling relationship has gone from implicit trust to not even being able to look each other in the eye. Why are the new authors destroying everything good from the first series? Other than Ian, of course.
And then she just randomly makes stupid, self-sacrificial decisions just because she can. Amy doesn't have to make sense because she's the Cahill leader (sounds so much like my science teacher except for the fact that she's not a Cahill leader). Exactly who thought Amy would make a good leader? Fiske, who's going a bit crazy in some retirement home? Old Amy made sound and compassionate decisions but lacked confidence, while new Amy has plenty of confidence but is utterly lacking in common sense.
I mentioned earlier that I ship Jamy now only because both Jake and Amy are impulsive and make bad decisions. If they choose to make the bad decision to be with each other, then I'm happy for them. I only hope Ian finds someone who's worthy of being with him... maybe Sinead?
3) The 6 collectible cards.
Ugh, do they even try anymore? I've seen 7th grade guys in my former school's newspaper do a better job with Photoshop (and that was on a picture of Kim Jong Un's face). Enough said.
4) So many authors (this is about all the books rather than just Breakaway).
I think the saying, "Too many cooks spoil the broth" best describes my point, and by that I mean that each author portrays the characters differently, whether in a small or large way (like how Jonah's really talented musically and the world loves him but when he tries to entertain his fellow Cahill hostages in Day of Doom with his musical talents, everyone finds him really annoying. Or how Jonah varies in how 'gangsta' he acts). The first series and books 1-5 of the second series are pretty good about maintaining consistent personalities. But David Baldacci is not a chidrens' author. Maybe Jeff Hirsch is, but then again, I've never heard of him before. Both of them make me wonder if they even read the other books in the series because of their ineptitude at writing realistic emotional scenes about the Cahills.
I'm sure there's a ton of negatives I could dig up, but unfortunately, I don't have my copy of the book anymore (pesky library due dates), so I'll just end my review here. It's weird though, because most people's reviews that I read are like, "Great job! Everyone is so in character," and then I wonder if they meant to review some other book...
Sorry if I sound too harsh about the book; it's just that I really don't like it.