3.5
I read John Gottman’s Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work a couple of years ago and loved it. Imagine my surprise and confusion then, as I was recently reading/critiquing the book Love and Respect by E. Eggerichs, when Eggerichs kept referencing this book—Why Marriages Succeed or Fail by John Gottman—as a backup for his theories.
This was disorienting to me, since I strongly disagree with much of the Love & Respect book but highly value the years of respected research done by the Gottman Institute. To hear John Gottman quoted in Love & Respect did not make sense, therefore I read this book simply to see if Gottman’s research does indeed validate Eggerichs’ ideas.
It does not.
While Gottman does frequently state that successful marriages depend on mutual love & respect, not once does he ever insinuate that men require respect while women desire love, as Eggerichs claims.
I did recognize some of the points made in Eggerichs’ book, specifically the research done by Gottman which says that *85% of stonewallers are men*.
However, Eggerichs twists that statistic to say that
*85% of men stonewall*. That is not the same thing. Eggerichs further claimed that stonewalling by men is a “good-willed” response to disrespectful wives. That is a blatantly twisted misrepresentation of the actual statistic presented by Gottman.
Another point of interest along the same lines was Gottman’s research on heart rates of men during conflict. Eggerichs uses Gottman’s research to claim that when men are in conflict with “disrespectful” wives, their heart rates go up because they are now in “battle mode” as part of their male nature. Eggerichs then goes on to claim that “good-willed” men will then stonewall/withdraw, so as to stop themselves from hurting their wives in anger.
This is not what Gottman’s research suggests at all. He states that when men’s heart rate goes up in conflict, it is because men feel more vulnerable and and are more easily flooded. They may then stonewall/withdraw so as to protect themselves (not to protect their wives from being attacked in anger 🙄). (And for the record, a man who has to leave the room so as to stop himself from hurting his wife is not a safe or good-willed person. Telling wives that this is a sign of their husband’s love for them is grossly manipulative.)
Gottman also makes it clear that frequent stonewalling is detrimental to the marriage—not a sign of “good will” as Eggerichs claims.
Gottman is also clear that his research does not represent every man or woman, and he states that the reader should only apply his findings to the extent that they actually apply to his or her unique personality and beliefs.
As far as the book itself, I only gave it 3 stars mainly for the reason that it is quite old (first written in 1995) and Gottman’s research has considerably grown and been refined since it was written.
Some of the book is quite jarring—specifically the example conversations between various couples in conflict. The name calling and verbal abuse presented as normal but unhealthy conflict was frequently disturbing.
Gottman also uses the term “mutual abuse,” which is a dated and debunked myth, and no longer considered acceptable in reputable marriage advice.
Much of the book is quite helpful and interesting, especially the breakdown of conflict/resolution styles and how to heal negative patterns in the marriage which prevent conflict from happening in a healthy and productive way.
However, I would suggest skipping this one and read Gottman’s 7 Principles for Making Marriage Work instead. It is much of the same research and helpful advice, but without some of the more dated gender stereotypes and updated to coincide with the latest findings in psychology and neuroscience.
In the end, I am simply relieved to find that no, Gottman’s research and data indeed does not support or validate the Scripture-twisting claims of Emerson Eggerichs’ anecdotal theories.