2.5 A very slow burn with an unlikeable, unreliable narrator, this wasn’t as thrilling or edge-of-your-seat as I’d hoped.
What I noticed as I was reading:
➤ I found the MC difficult to sympathize with as she refuses to listen to doctors and get medical tests done after a serious head injury, endangers other road users by driving with a serious head injury, and won’t take time to rest and recover. She’s obsessed with her job and lets her emotions guide her choices. She refuses to do the sensible thing at almost every juncture despite being a ‘stalking expert’. This character infuriated me consistently saying “I shouldn’t do [stupid thing] because [list of valid reasons]” and then does the stupid thing anyway… over and over again in every conceivable situation!
➤ The way it's written, I was worried this was a sequel as it felt like we were missing critical context about the MC’s relationship and history with her siblings.
➤ The liberties taken around psychological, legal, and technical terms grated on me. When words are just thrown in to sound technical, it dampens credibility and frustrates the reader. (Example: releasing a dangerous felon on the basis of ‘psychometric testing’; ‘suing’ people for criminal matters, ‘hacking’ into CCTV/access control databases remotely).
➤ I appreciated the language around suicide and reframing it from a ‘crime’ to simply as manner of death. I thought the commentary on this was conscious and thoughtful.
➤ Pacing was off, especially in the middle when the story really dragged. There were a distracting amount of uninteresting subplots (cheating husband, estranged family, weird son, repressed memories, job drama) that took centre stage at various intervals. I wasn’t as wowed by the ending as I’d hoped.
➤ The sense of place was well done. While I understand liberties were taken regarding the geography, I’ve never been to Cambridge so none of that impacted my ability to picture the buildings, place, and atmosphere as it was described.
➤ I hate the retaliatory cheating trope. An eye for an eye isn’t justice, it’s just two childish people being petty.
This is a fine way to spend a rainy couple of afternoons but I wanted more thrills and less melodrama than the book offered. Readers who enjoy slow burn crime fiction might enjoy this, provided you don’t need your characters to be particularly likeable or multi-dimensional.
I was privileged to have my request to read this book accepted through NetGalley. Thanks, Simon and Schuster UK!