This book was... idek. It was kind of meh, imo. Although I might have enjoyed it more if I was able to read a physical copy. *shrugs*
It was pretty interesting, if not the most original. For the longest time tho, whenever it would switch to Eric's POV I would be kind of frustrated. I'm not sure why, I would usually love getting a POV from someone in his position, and it's not like I dislike him or anything, but yeah.
I would say Mason is my fav character - he prob still is - but he did drive me crazy with his thoughts about how most young women Seria's age are helpless, and just let their fathers take care of them until they get married. That definitely rubbed me the wrong way. Now, I can stomach that sort of thing, if it's addressed as wrong, but it never was. Not only does Mason never seem to realize he was wrong, but the way it was written doesn't even make it feel like the author thinks he's wrong. Although I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, and believe it was supposed to show that Mason is, in fact, incorrect about certain things.
On a similar note... Dreeya. *prepares for a little rant* Alright, so Dreeya is the only female warrior we ever get to meet in this book, and she's on the dark side (yeah, I could talk about that for a minute, but let's avoid making this review even longer, shall we?). Anyway, Dreeya is an extremely shallow character. It's not like she's the only one, we literally have a town drunk in this book who does nothing but harass the FMC (although not sexually, so, that's something), but that's beside the point. Because Dreeya is the one that really drives me crazy. Because Dreeya is one of two friends, or whatever, of Mason's that we see. And, as aforementioned, the only female warrior we actually meet. And she spends all her page time trying to get Mason to sleep with her, the only exception being when she's yelling at a stable boy about a (small) grease spot on her saddle. I feel like there was no point to her, and she was just so... stereotypical. And that frustrates me much more than she does. #Notafan
The allegorical aspect was fine, but... I wasn't exactly a fan. Although, to be fair, allegories in general aren't really my thing, so maybe that's just me. This one felt both too on the nose, and yet also not at all, if that makes any sense. Yes, I'm aware I prob sound crazy, but I can't explain it.
Also, just gotta say, reading this around the same time as rereading Six of Crows sort of gave me whiplash with the whole revenge thing. Did I almost want Mason to get revenge? Not really, but also...
Forgive me if, in spite of his flaws, I found him more sympathetic than the other characters. Forgive me if I found myself perhaps just slightly hating some Stewards, myself, at times. Forgive me if I agree with not forcing the Code on people.
Oh my, what are all my Christian friends going to think about this review?
But seriously, you can't force someone to be a Christain. That kind of goes against the whole point. And I get that this world is divided into two sides and all, but... remember what I said about the allegory? Yeah. Maybe I'm just not used to reading them. Maybe that's the issue.
Anyway, in spite of all my complaining, I did enjoy this to a certain extent, and the fact that I didn't enjoy it more might be partially due to my being unable to read a physical copy, as well as the fact that I was reading multiple books at once. And I will prob read the sequel at some point, although I'm not really sure.