What do you think?
Rate this book
The Ninesquare Notebook: An Objective Knowledge Manifesto
As Nathan Coppedge writes in The Dimensional Philosopher's Toolkit, "The amelioration of jagged potencies is really the second center". This text was his early inspiration on that subject, and in some ways more ambitious. It was here first where Nathan realized that a new method of categorical deduction using exclusive opposites was possible, and also where he later, upon revising, discovered that deductions could proceed indefinitely in binary form. This is savory philosophy, and the effect is avant-garde. Find the source insights of this most profound and knowledge-oriented methodology.
106 pages, Paperback
First published January 15, 2013
1 person want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
May 4, 2014
This is a significant earlier work of philosophy by the author of the Dimensional Philosopher's Toolkit, not to be confused with Baggini and Fosl's Philosopher's Toolkit.
The text develops philosophy in a more traditional, non-encyclopedic format, while maintaining some of the avant-garde, diagrammatic methods present in the other book.
I would say that this text contributes to knowledge on subjects such as modality, coherency, paradoxes, scope of knowledge, and methodology.
The structure of the book is compelling for a kind of constructivist view of knowledge which is rare in academia.
The text may also have implications for logic of language and metaphysics, via graphical technology and concepts of coherence.
Although it is an earlier work, recent additions explain some notable advances upon the categorical deductive method that Nathan introduced in the Dimensional Philosopher's Toolkit.
The text develops philosophy in a more traditional, non-encyclopedic format, while maintaining some of the avant-garde, diagrammatic methods present in the other book.
I would say that this text contributes to knowledge on subjects such as modality, coherency, paradoxes, scope of knowledge, and methodology.
The structure of the book is compelling for a kind of constructivist view of knowledge which is rare in academia.
The text may also have implications for logic of language and metaphysics, via graphical technology and concepts of coherence.
Although it is an earlier work, recent additions explain some notable advances upon the categorical deductive method that Nathan introduced in the Dimensional Philosopher's Toolkit.
Displaying 1 of 1 review