5/5 stars. Thanks TikTok!
As a fan of Alice Loxton’s history content on TikTok (and someone interested in the late 1700s & British history), I was really excited when she published this book and knew I had to read it.
Historical nonfiction purists out there probably won’t enjoy this as much as I did from a writing style perspective: Loxton uses modern references to make points in a very casual, comical, delivery style. She uses hypothetical dialogue, journal entries, and “picture this” narrative devices to bring the reader into the past-she doesn’t simply regurgitate factual information. This, for me, was an interesting choice, but one that worked, especially given the light, jokey content & tone of the book. Her delivery style on TikTok and her delivery in this book is very similar-I could hear her voice in my head as I read this!
Regarding content: though I’m interested in the Georgian period in general, I wouldn’t necessarily choose a book about famous-yet-not-famous Georgian figures to read about. But, I’m glad I did! It’s fascinating, genuinely, to read about normal people from the past, see how they navigate major historical events, and just understand the gossipy, media culture of the time. I also learned a lot about satirists and caricature artists and the tabloidish media…and saw that honestly, it really hasn’t changed that much. My favorite chapters dealt with the French Revolution and how that was handled by the satirists in England: it was supported by the English public and thus supported via caricature, but as soon as they murked their king, public opinion turned…and the satirists did too (though they did take the opportunity to poke fun, to an extent, at the English for their hypocrisy regarding perceived French “barbarism” after their king’s execution - I mean, the English had murked *their* king only 100 years prior after all!).
What really struck me was the revelation that these satirist-Rowlandson, Gillray, Cruikshanks, and Humphrey (not a true satirist but she gave them a platform in her publishing house!) - haven’t been written about before at this level of depth. Like, I vividly remember seeing these satire images while learning about the Georgian era in my history classes in school (after all, they have a particular look to them); if I saw them in America back in 2011, they must have been viewed and studied widely! But no: as Loxton says, the Victorians did a good job of stamping out their memory (as an aside, Loxton did a great job of depicting the differences between Georgian London-opulent, unserious [even when things were very much serious], light, funny, and indulgent - and Victorian London: dark, dingy, chaste, hypocritical, and serious). Her book, therefore, does history a service of bringing the history-and the people behind them-to life once again.