What do you think?
Rate this book
The Woman's Study Bible: Second Edition
Book by Thomas Nelson
1824 pages, Imitation Leather
First published September 1, 1995
2 people are currently reading
2 people want to read
About the author
Anonymous
791k books3,367 followersBooks can be attributed to "Anonymous" for several reasons:
* They are officially published under that name
* They are traditional stories not attributed to a specific author
* They are religious texts not generally attributed to a specific author
Books whose authorship is merely uncertain should be attributed to Unknown.
See also: Anonymous
* They are officially published under that name
* They are traditional stories not attributed to a specific author
* They are religious texts not generally attributed to a specific author
Books whose authorship is merely uncertain should be attributed to Unknown.
See also: Anonymous
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
October 23, 2017
Loved reading through the entire bible in a year, it showed me how much mercy and grace God has. No matter how many times people turn away, God keeps reaching out, forgiving, loving and helping.
I like the background information about the women in the bible this edition gives. The inspirational quotes are all right.
The side notes often have very good additional information, both historic and from other parts of the bible, however, I can't compare it to another study bible since this is my first. I couldn't agree with some of the side notes since I thought they were theologically inaccurate but that is open to interpretation..
I like the background information about the women in the bible this edition gives. The inspirational quotes are all right.
The side notes often have very good additional information, both historic and from other parts of the bible, however, I can't compare it to another study bible since this is my first. I couldn't agree with some of the side notes since I thought they were theologically inaccurate but that is open to interpretation..
Displaying 1 of 1 review