Warning: SPOILERS
It's kind of tough to rate this book because I enjoyed the parts pertaining to historical fiction but I was not enamored by Khalidah or the constant incorrect references to Christians and Muslims praying to a different God.
Starting with Khalidah, I can see why a lot of people would love her character, but for me she was a distraction from an otherwise enjoyable read. Maybe it was because her character seemed too perfect or 'Mary-Sue' in an unrealistic manner - she has never fought in a battle or been a part of an army, but after getting trained for 3 weeks, she is able to successfully lead a small contingent of elite mounted archers into battle against Turkish Archers and Templar Knights (the elite type that guard the King of Jerusalem) and survive with barely a scratch...more than once. She gets ambushed by men who are sent to kidnap her home (she's run away from having to marry her very obviously evil cousin), and suddenly she's an elite warrior, coming from a long line of amazons, swishing her sword about and felling her enemies...after only being trained in secret, probably with a sole attacking instructor. I don't mind strong women in literature, by all means, please give me strong women, but I guess I'm looking for more varieties of them without so many surprising skills all neatly boxed into one package in a tempestuous 16 year old.
That being said, I liked everything else about her story - she travels across the Middle East to find her mother and in so, learns about (and teaches the reader) a little bit here and there about the history of these Kingdoms, their mythology and beliefs before they were Islamic and the presence of other civilizations. Her travel companion is Sulayman, a minstrel, who educates her on how every civilization begins with invaders - maybe the Europeans have invaded this land, but before they did the Muslims took it from someone else, who took it from someone else, who took it from someone else...and the list goes on. These parts are informative and revealing, and I wish that they were delved into more.
The other character this story follows is Bilal, Khalidah's childhood friend and fellow outcast. The background is that they are Bedouins, but have foreign blood. Khalidah's mother comes from an unknown land beyond Persia where everyone has gold eyes (that she has inherited) and Bilal has blue eyes thanks to his not so mysterious European father. Well these eyes get Bilal into trouble, and I can actually believe his side of the story more than Khalidah's somehow...maybe it's because his character flaws and development is more apparent. He's a very different person at the end of the story (she less so). His eyes lead him to be used in the deadly politics around the Kingdom of Jerusalem, to Saladdin's war camp, and finally into the heart of one of the Sultan's younger but more capable sons.
While Khalidah's journey was into history and even myth, Bilal's journey was into the realities of politics and war.
My major annoyance comes from the depiction of Christianity and Islam as two completely different religions that pray to a different God, despite one reference to both faiths being 'Children of the Book'. Maybe it's also because of the news, maybe it's an irrational pet peeve, or even my education, but in the places where I grew up, one of the first things we learned in the religion segment of my elementary school was that those who follow Judaism, Christianity and Islam pray to the same God, but they follow different prophets and therefore, interpretations of that same God's teachings. The latter causes debate and conflict, but the former is generally agreed upon. In my history classes from around the same time, this seemed to be something that was generally understood back then, which was why under Muhammad's unification of Arabia, Muslims, Jews and Christians paid less taxes than the other non-Book believers. Even if the taxation system ended by Saladdin's time or if the continuous conflict with Crusaders brought an end to that understanding, it's written in the Qu'ran, so the Muslim characters should at least remember that.
This very fundamental understanding is not really touched upon in this book at all. Khalidah always thinks of the Crusaders as praying to a different God, wondering how their God would prefer things to play out. There is one conversation between Bilal and Salim where they wonder if maybe the reason why their holy lands are the same (and therefore why they keep fighting over it) is because their religion is actually the same. This conversation is left as soon as it is started because Bilal correctly observes that it does not matter if their religion is the same because the war was never really about religion in the first place. Point taken but if the message of this book is also about ending crusades forever (which is what it says in the beginning), why not drive home the point with a hammer that yes...we're talking about and praying to the same God here. It's even written in the Qu'ran that Allah is the same God that the Jews and the Christians pray to.
With that interpretation, I could maybe understand a Christian character mistakenly believing that Allah is a completely different God and that's why Islam is a different religion (and hopefully, since this is a book, being corrected on that assumption), but I can't understand how every single character in this book is living off that assumption. Fine, maybe Khalidah and Bilal cannot read the holy book (they only learn how to read halfway through this story) and maybe they were taught by an ignorant party. Salim however, has absolutely no excuse for such ignorance - he is Saladdin's son, and therefore a Prince who has been afforded the best education, imams, scribes, tutors and thinkers available in the Islamic World to learn from, and I'm sure that he's had to study and read his holy book and pick up a few things from it, even if he didn't like studying. Something as big as 'same God' can't be overlooked. And yet...there he is...wondering 'hey, I just thought about this and it really disturbs me - could it be that our holy places are the same because...our God is the same? We are the same?'...a little late on the uptake there aren't you Salim?
I kept reading and hoping for a few things - 1) Khalidah's character development. I kind of get it in the end but only with a stretch of my imagination. She's always very much the same girl that runs away from her tribe at the age of 16. The only difference is that she's a little war weary at the end of the book and is a little more open minded about how she thinks people can live. I guess Bilal makes up for it, from being restless, ambitious, stubborn and jealous to a fairly humble, experienced and likeable character. 2) I thought that all the obvious misunderstandings about religion would be cleared up in some way - maybe a wise old character commenting somewhere, or an epiphany that the characters get when they're essentially living in Eden......nope. As far as I can tell, they will die thinking that. I guess that's a realistic depiction of life, but since this is a book, and obviously a book that intended to educate, I was hoping that it would do that more on this.
It's tough to balance out historical fiction sometimes. Some readers get very bored with history, some readers only want the history. For me I suppose the Sand Daughter was too light on history. I loved what I did get, but I wanted more, probably to make up for Khalidah's superpowers.