ARC Review for Robin Castle's mystery novel: Seven Years Missing
3.5 stars - I'm rounding it up to 4 stars
I received an ARC version of the novel from the author in exchange for an honest review. Disclaimer: I have not read the first book in this series, so I am judging this novel as a standalone. My opinions of the characters are based on how they are presented in this book only, so it's possible more context was provided in book one to justify certain character beliefs/traits that I took some issue with in this reading - specifically around the main character Pear.
I love mysteries, and this mystery follows Pear as she investigates the disappearance of Hailie Li's husband 7 years after he is first reported missing and the case runs cold.
First off, this book is easy to read, with a tendency toward shorter sentences that lend to the novel's quick pacing. It definitely picks up toward the end in the last ten or so chapters and finishes on a one-page epilogue that addresses one later concern I had with the mystery plot that would have been a plot hole had it not been addressed (I won't say what it was, since that would be a major spoiler). There were a few grammatical errors but nothing too distracting. Overall, the novel doesn't get too dark and I'm glad the ending worked out the way it did. I was not disappointed.
The reason I'm giving this book an unofficial 3.5 and 4 stars as an official rating is because I strongly disliked Pear's character for a huge chunk of the novel, but overall it was a good read. She's kind of like her preferred beverage, coffee - an acquired taste and not for everyone. She certainly has potential to be more likable, but she tends to frame the investigation and her takes on each potential suspect in a black and white fashion (she did this until the big reveal at the end). I would think a more nuanced and well-rounded approach to each suspect would have made more sense and felt less jarring to read. However, I will say she has the tendency to view other characters with scarce nuance and only affords the benefit of the doubt to a couple individuals (including herself). So, while I found this quirk a bit annoying to read, it was consistent with her characterization throughout the book.
On a similar note but more egregious, she is a horrible friend to Sunny. Not even a friend, really, but a begrudging acquaintance to a woman who shows her more grace than she deserves. I don't think this is an actual spoiler for this novel, because it's based on events from the last novel. But to be safe and spoiler-free, let's just say Pear accused Sunny of something that has led to her unemployment and the community at large has been mocking her or avoiding her because of Pear's incorrect accusation. The one scene where Pear has the opportunity to apologize for screwing up Sunny's life, something comes up with Pear and then the scene is flipped around and Sunny apologizes ... It's disappointing because at no point does Pear ever fully self-reflect, and she only justifies her false accusation by minimizing to herself how it has impacted Sunny and consistently judging Sunny for having more money (mind you, Sunny also has three children, so it's not like the accusation only affected Sunny). Pear comes off as jealous of Sunny without being self-aware enough to realize she's actually jealous. Ironically, another integral character has been accused of a similar crime and she has also faced discrimination because of it, but Pear is more sympathetic to that situation ... kind of. All in all, my biggest issue with the novel was Pear and how she swings back and forth so easily in her investigating (in a way that doesn't come off as deliberating the truth with a full deck of cards) and how she judges others so harshly while making excuses for her own mistakes.
There were times where I thought she might be growing up and turning things around for the better, but those instances never followed through with action, so Pear still has a lot of room to grow into a better person - and a more enjoyable character. Also, importantly, she's not completely unlikable - I admire her work ethic and I think myself and a lot of people can relate in some way to her relationship with her mother and her love of coffee. I think readers who like critical protagonists (who may not always be the most trustworthy narrators, so you have to read between the lines a bit for a more accurate picture of what's going on) would enjoy Pear. I just tend to prefer characters who see more nuance, and are less hypocritical (or whose flaws are challenged more by the other characters, thereby forcing the protagonist to address the flaws, and some small or big change comes from them doing so).
Other things of note: There's a love interest who isn't really a love interest, but he comes up randomly, briefly, and it feels like there is no chemistry. Luckily, Pear seems more resolute to move on from him at the end of the story. As for Movad, a corrupt company that led to an environmental disaster, I enjoyed the story around it and the demonstrated long-term affects. I don't understand why more wasn't said about the impact on local animals, but I imagine it's nothing good. The main suspect in this novel is also a complex and fascinating character! So is Mama and Elise. The side characters in general were likeable and entertaining. I felt immersed while reading the story. The author does a great job painting a scene. All in all, I do think this novel is worth a read and I like the cast we have to work with. I just want to see Pear have more character development and have her flaws addressed in a way that really forces her to acknowledge them and respond appropriately.