Straight after finishing this, I went and added Shah's Nightmarch to my already overloaded to-read list, which I am stating up front because I suspect I am mostly going to criticise this book, but it is the irritation of a fan. The Incarcerations tells a vital story - the kind of story you wonder "how did I not know about this", and Shah is clearly uniquely positioned to tell it. Part of the book's challenges are just with the story - sixteen Indian figures have been charged with a conspiracy, but little about any of this makes sense. The conspiracy is bizarrely connected to a peaceful festival protesting caste, which is somehow blamed for inciting a mob attack upon Dalits the next day; and most of the accused had nothing at all to do with either, not even proximity. On top of this, the accused are also accused of being Naxalites, even though none have such connections, and there is no connection of the Naxelites to the festival or the mob violence. Then there is also an accusation the whole thing is tied into a plot to assassinate Modi. It is all a bit of a mixed up bag.
In trying to tell this story, Shah weaves between elements, starting with a basic explanation and then delving into the deep biographies of some of the accused. This was some of my favourite content, as Shah manages to turn what could be a grim bit into an homage to India's varied activism, tackling Adivasi protests against land theft and dams, anti-caste activism, defense of Muslim and Kashmiri communities, and more.
About a third of the way into the book, however, Shah pivots to try to tell the story of how the investigation by supporters and NGOs started to unravel evidence of extensive hacking of the technology of those accused over many years and the planting of documents purportedly linking them to Naxalite movements. Shah also tries to cover what happens to each accused, the background to the terrorist laws that allow them to be held for years with no trial (the conviction rates are under 3% for these laws)- based on clearly ludicrous evidence. She also engages in discussions around whether you could describe Modi's government as fascist, in a fundamental or technical sense. It is a lot.
The book feels a lot like it morphs and changes, and it can be hard to keep all the multitude of threads straight.
But it is a very important book, and each part is most engaging. It is hard to believe, really, that this was unfolding in the last few years, that something this bizarre and blatant could happen in modern, independent India, and most of all, that the rest of us could simply not notice.