I read and highly praised Levine’s The Gospel of Mark in a review. However, this book on the Gospel of John was a major letdown – to say the least.
The historicist approach is embraced and there are compelling instances of Greek and Hebrew etymology, but what struck me was a comment made by the author on page 14 – when introducing the technical term, “realized eschatology,” she briefly explains it and then abruptly dismisses it, declaring, “that’s enough technical terminology for one chapter.”
Say what?
After reading her excellent and thorough previous work, this text appeared to be written quickly, and because of that, it suffers. It was far too superficial for my liking, especially when compared to her book on the Gospel of Mark.
Dr. James M. Magrini
Former: Philosophy/College of DuPage (US)