No Labels proposes a vision for the United States where lawmakers actually work together and seek bipartisan consensus regarding our nation's biggest problem. The book offers nice words, but they come off more like the broken promises of hope and change that hypnotized voters in 2008. It is a nice vision of America that we have lawmakers reach across the political aisle to do what is best for America, but No Labels offers no strategy for making this happen -- only saying that lawmakers need to hold hands.
The organization calls the book the first step toward a better America, but doesn't lay out the path. The book explains that while reform efforts to improve elections in the US are noble, they are not immediate solutions and the No Labels vision is an immediate solution to hyper-partisan gridlock.
How do you get a lawmaker more concerned about re-election to shift his or her priorities? How can one expect a politician who only represents less than 5 percent of his or her constituency to work across the political aisle? How can lawmakers join together to discuss the real needs of the American people when Congress lacks adequate representation?
To these questions, No Labels offers no answers. The book offers nice words and good one-liners, but they are things that Americans have heard time and time again on the campaign trail. They are empty words from “Problem Solvers” who are incapable or unwilling to come out with real, strategic plans to solve the nation’s biggest problems.
Bipartisan solutions, like what No Labels says we should strive for, sounds good on paper, but often times does not result in real solutions. Most instances of bipartisan compromise have resulted in nothing changing at worst and a temporary remedy that just pushes the problem back for future generations at best.
"Today in Washington, DC most people think of the words “bipartisan solution” the way they think of the tooth fairy. It’s a nice idea— until you grow up and realize it’s a fantasy," said Dr. Alice Rivlin. "But I’ve seen that fantasy become a reality many times, including twice in the last few years."
No, most people know that bipartisan solutions are possible as they have seen what bipartisanship in Washington means. What people think is a fantasy is that lawmakers could actually work toward real solutions that just don't combine partisan solutions, but are nonpartisan solutions. No Labels is still confined within the two-party system and believes that between Republicans and Democrats, the answer must be there. What if Republicans AND Democrats have it wrong on an issue and are completely missing the real problem?
No labels touts its No Budget, No Pay initiative in the book and when a person hears the title of it, the first thought must be, "That is such a great idea. Why didn't we have something like this in place before the government shutdown." We did. A No Budget, No Pay law was signed by President Obama in February 2013. It didn't assure a budget would be passed by the end of the fiscal year because lawmakers didn't have anything to worry about. First, lawmakers would still be paid, it would just be put into an escrow account. Second, Congress has essentially become a millionaires club.
Again, at face value, the initiative sounds great, but it doesn't solve any problems. Even if it spurred lawmakers to act, it wouldn't mean Congress would past the best budget proposals. In fact, it would likely have an adverse effect where lawmakers just scramble to put something together, but obviously the initiative didn't do anything to prevent a government shutdown that cost as much 120,000 jobs and billions of dollars.
Americans want our lawmakers to work together, but they want them to seek out real solutions that go beyond the strictures of partisan ideas. That is why a growing number of people are rejecting party labels and why party registration is at an all-time low. Real change, like what No Labels says they are working for, won't happen if the current electoral system prevents adequate representation. If organization leaders cannot answer the questions posed above, their "solution" is not as immediate as they would convince people.