Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Great War and the Origins of Humanitarianism, 1918–1924

Rate this book
The aftermath of the Great War brought the most troubled peacetime the world had ever seen. Survivors of the war were not only the soldiers who fought, the wounded in mind and body. They were also the stateless, the children who suffered war’s consequences, and later the victims of the great Russian famine of 1921 to 1923. Before the phrases ‘universal human rights’ and ‘non-governmental organization’ even existed, five remarkable men and women - René Cassin and Albert Thomas from France, Fridtjof Nansen from Norway, Herbert Hoover from the US and Eglantyne Jebb from Britain - understood that a new type of transnational organization was needed to face problems that respected no national boundaries or rivalries. Bruno Cabanes, a pioneer in the study of the aftermath of war, shows, through his vivid and revelatory history of individuals, organizations, and nations in crisis, how and when the right to human dignity first became inalienable.

397 pages, Paperback

First published March 31, 2014

33 people want to read

About the author

Bruno Cabanes

23 books3 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (5%)
4 stars
4 (22%)
3 stars
5 (27%)
2 stars
8 (44%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Profile Image for Mandi Rollinson.
22 reviews8 followers
September 4, 2019
It was an informative book and I could tell that Cabanes cares deeply about the subject. I was delightfully surprised at the interdisciplinary nature of the book - nutrition and child rights and veteran's experience. I absolutely know more than I previously did about a decade (1920s) that does kinda get forgotten about in between WWI and WWII.

However, the down side of the book is that I think the author needs better topic sentences and summarizing sentences. I would think we were on one person or topic and there'd be a diversion to another. He'd have a reason to do so, but he didn't clearly explain it upfront. I found the book very boring to read and somewhat narcolepsy inducing.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.