In which the dynastic families of America and their Foundation philanthropies go all in on remaking the world to look like Star Trek, and set about flanking, pacing-and-leading, High+Low-v-Middling everything that spoils the composition. And also plan to secure a substantial risk-free global income stream in the process.
One fascinating insight is that the Long March was policy, at least of one part of the state. The Trotskyist true-believers, if such things exist, walked in through doors opened by Wall St and the foundations. One less convincing one is the apparent dislike of Wall St for war (ie Vietnam): if true then, it's surely not so today when instability is the grist to arbitrage and quick profit.
I suppose the big question is the ancestry of the vision of Star Trek: the idea of a free-floating cosmopolitan order, post-race, post-nation, post-everything. What's the ancestry of lightness-of-being, of forgetfulness, of creative destruction being a great thing - not a cyclical thing, but rolling onwards forever? Is it the emergent will of Capital? And how does this elite work, with its feminine side: generous, careless, indulgent; and its masculine: machiavellian, panoptical, ruthless.. There's something Olympian about it, and the gods notoriously get bored with human order and peace.
explores more deeply the oligarchic funding of liberal-leftists ideas and activism, you could say it is a more in-depth version of Bolton's previous book "revolution from above"