Sangeeta Barooah Pisharoty explores the history of Axom and its people really beautifully and in-depth, although it is sad to see varying shades of bias creep in, especially in the first and last chapter.
The biases:
The book goes above and beyond to implicate the Aryan theory, that too as an invasion in particular, on the reader. The book explores how people from across SE Asia and Himalayas and Austric people and even Mainlanders immigrated here over the centuries. But it tries to claim “Aryan” people as a race of their own, which is a gross (and racist) misuse of the word. It would be right to say the “Vedic” people came. “Arya” is an adjective (i.e a describing word), like “beautiful" or “smart”. A race cannot be “Arya” unless it has Aryan qualities; which we cannot say for every single mainlander. Additionally, Yunnan used to be Sanatani as well. It had a Puranic culture, and it was the Aryan Yunan people who took Yamaraj to the Chinese mainland. This is where the Ahoms came from as well, from Yunnan (illegally occupied by China today).
I support the complete end to using the foreign word “Hindu”, but even without the word used even once I hate seeing the mislabeling so common in the archaic academia of the left.
Additionally, the author seems to insist mention of Islamic tradition in Axom even if the contribution is minimal or even peripheral, or happenstance. Now I am not inherently against this; but when the book goes out of its way to tell us about Ali’s children’s beheading when describing an Islamic tradition, but fails to mention the story of Krishna even once in the MULTIPLE aspects of Axomiya culture from Sankardev to other arts, I do question why this blind spot exists.
I will put political considerations of the author aside (which I do think they were; will explain why), but I think that, just because we grew up in Hindu households, and these stories are known across the length and breadth of Bharat, that they’re common knowledge. We take them for granted. And when someone reads book after book with this exact blind spot suddenly sees it, they find themselves open to a whole new world. The left is unable to claim this aspect of culture due to their insistence on coaxing the Jewish 40% instead.
As for the final chapter, the book does make the argument that communalism is bad for Axom. It brings up the’jatiotabad’ movement of Axomi sovereignty, which every state has its own version of and is commonly called “Jatitva” today. While it is true that Jati makes a good chunk of our Indic identity (50% to be precise), the other 50% is made up of “Hindutva” (not to be confused with Sanatanatva). To say one makes up our identity and not the other is exclusionist, especially when one is given more emphasis than the other.
The fact that 40% of Assamese speak Axomiya is scary. This is something most Assamese Muslims would also agree with, and the Appendix also mentions this clearly. This is in line with Savarkar’s version of Hindutva (where if any Muslim considers Bharat their punyabhumi they are Hindu). Conversely, many of these Assamese “Muslims” could do gharwapsi to differentiate themselves from the colonizer too, furthering the assimilation of Axomiya people.
As the tandav of kalyug continues, we will see how this turns out.
The best parts:
The book is, on the other hand, really well written. It talks about the various kingdoms of Axom, the cultural links it has to the East Asian world (although yes I desired more links to the mainland as well), the practices and the folk songs.
The best chapters in this book do talk about the artisan skills of Axom, the handicrafts, the music, the movies; the cultural aspect. The book left out Axomiya meme culture, the traceless tasteless aspect, or even newer singers like Kaysee who represent my generation much better (Gen Z), but it is alright. What we get instead is some very high quality movie buff history of a regional cinema that is not being funded enough. I would even love to read the cited books next, simply because the regional cinema history of our country is equally fascinating and underrated.
The author’s research, her visit to various artisans’s houses, their interviews and questions on their identity, their wants and need for preservation, GI tags, amenities, etc; it really reflects in the depth of research.
Sangeeta Barooah Pisharoty truly paints the Assamese people in her own image; and what a vivid painting it is! Outside of her blind spots for Sanatani culture (leaving it unexplained), I would say this is a great book. Highly recommend it, but do beware of the biases in the narrative. Unless narratives of history can entirely divorce themselves from political considerations, true history and True Indology will seldom be found in our books and in our identities. Such books can be a great start to self discovery of our identity; but they are in no way the end of it.
Sadly, the criticism ran longer than the praise, but it is simply because the devil is in the deets; this book deserves its due despite its bias.
Score:
7/10
Follow me on Medium! @karthikthegovil