Calibán y la bruja: mujeres, cuerpo y acumulación originaria

by Silvia Federici

1022506

Genres: Feminism, Nonfiction, History, Politics, Philosophy, Theory, Sociology

Audible Audio

First published September 15, 2004

About the author

Silvia Federici is an Italian and American scholar, teacher, and activist from the radical autonomist feminist Marxist and anarchist tradition. She is a professor emerita and Teaching Fellow at Hofstra University, where she was a social science professor. She worked as a teacher in Nigeria for many years, is also the co-founder of the Committee for Academic Freedom in Africa, and is a member of the Midnight Notes Collective.

Reviews

[Trevor · Rating 5 out of 5]

This book is really something else – I can’t recommend it too highly. In Capital, Marx needs to explain how capitalism got started. So, he talks about what he calls the primitive accumulation of capital – this involves the early capitalists effectively stealing wealth from those around them so they have the initial capital they needed to begin the process of capitalist production and therefore further accumulation of wealth that surplus value brings into being. Marx does this to show there is no basis upon which capitalism can argue that a future working class revolution taking the means of production from capitalists is immoral, since capitalist wealth is, in all senses, stolen in the first place. The point of this book is, in part anyway, to show that the primitive accumulation argument Marx uses ignores the part played both by women and the native populations in the new world in providing capitalism with this initial capital impetus along the road to full capitalist development.

And so this is the story of centuries of nightmares. The transition from feudalism to capitalism gets a pretty good rap as one of human progress – you know, the metaphors used are very much those of a new day dawning – we are moving from the ‘dark ages’ to the ‘enlightenment’. But for many people, and particularly for women and brown-skinned people who lived far away – the dawning of capitalism was to be plunged into utter darkness.

One of the stories that is often told about why capitalism is better than other form of social organisation is the ‘tragedy of the commons’ – that is, if there is some land that is owned in common by everyone, then the self-interest of everyone means that this land, that in effect belongs to no one, will be over-exploited and quickly become worthless to everyone. This means that private ownership proves the best means of protecting property. And although this theory only became popular last century, versions of it were used in the transition from feudalism as the justification for the enclosure of common lands. The author explains that this was necessary because it was only by the peasants being deprived of all access to being able to sustain themselves that they would then be forced to sell their labour to the capitalists. The author points out that with the introduction of capitalism the share of production going to those at the bottom of society fell drastically and was not to raise again to the levels that had been enjoyed in late-feudalism for a couple of hundred years. Often it was women who worked on the commons, and what was effectively produced their sustained their families. And so enclosing these commons was a direct attack not only on peasant self-sufficiency, but also on female independent labour, both of which was necessary if working in the ‘dark satanic mills’ was to be seen as an option.

The idea that Capitalism pays workers enough, but no more, than what is necessary for them to reproduction their labour power is a central idea of Marxist theory of surplus value – but reproduction (in all its senses) would be impossible without the unpaid labour of women. Effectively, this unpaid labour is all that allows the economy to operate – reproducing labour power by providing food to male workers as well as providing the next generation of workers from their wombs. And when women were employed doing the same work as men they were always paid significantly less – this was legally true up to the end of the last century and is de facto true even today. All of which sustained capitalist profits and therefore accelerated the process of primitive accumulation.

The question she asks here that is probably most troubling is what role did the witch hunts play in the early years of capitalist development? Again, we like to think of feudalism as the irrational form of society that became obsessed with witches and witch-craft (think Monty Python’s Holy Grail) – but as is made horribly clear in this book, witch-craft became a terrible problem that needed to be addressed mostly under capitalism and with some estimating that as many as a million women murdered by the Inquisition and other pogroms (although, this seems to have been revised down to between 100,000 and half a million -still…these are terrifying figures). The Inquisition was not nearly as vicious as the protestant churches were in pursuing witches, and, as Weber makes clear, Protestant churches were quite closely linked to the development of capitalism, particularly around their ‘personal relationship with god’.

The author stresses that there needed to be a new relationship within families to support the needs of capitalism, and one of these was a division of labour that included unpaid work in family reproduction performed by women (not just having babies, but also in other family maintenance tasks). This meant that all other activities women had previously done were either devalued or taken from them. This included midwifery – surely something that had always been a female occupation, but that then became a male one under early capitalism.

The need for an increasing population meant forcing women to be compliant, not only to their husbands, but also to the needs of the society more generally. The link between witch burning and reproduction is discussed at length here – particularly around the use of contraceptives and other forms of birth control that were not only made illegal, but that their use and advice given on this were punishable by death. Many ‘witches’ were labelled as such and murdered due to the assistance they provided around birth control.

Many more were old women past their ability to produce offspring or even work. The ‘cui bono’ vision of such processes would see the labelling of such women as witches as convenient, to say the least. Their murder simultaneously serving a range of objectives, not least in removing from the village a mouth to feed, but also in keeping others in their place. The tortures these women were subjected to would be guaranteed to ensure other women would think twice before stepping out of line.

The murder of homosexuals was also related to this idea of prohibiting non-reproductive sex. Interestingly, this book provides the origins of two words used to describe homosexual men I’d always wondered about. One is faggot – which is linked here to the faggots of sticks used in preparing the fires to burn people, and the other is the Italian word for homosexual ‘finocchio’ (fennel). I’ve asked so many Italians why this might mean homosexual, and no one has been able to tell me, but it turns out that fennel was often placed on the fires used to burn people so as to help cover the stench of their burning flesh. Sometimes it is very hard to not actively dislike humans.

The author compares the treatment of women with that of the subjugated peoples of the New World. In fact, the accusations of devil worship, cannibalism and so on, are nearly identical. I hadn’t realised that Caliban (the sprite like character from The Tempest) had become something of a third-world hero, in the sense of people saying ‘we are all Caliban’ as a means of identifying as oppressed.

This is a fascinating book – and about a history I have known far too little about. It is highly readable, but also packed to overflowing with fascinating insights.

[Aonarán · Rating 4 out of 5]

It's pretty hard for me to give a book five stars and I'm tempted to give that to Caliban.

I recently read this with some of my friends in a reading group and not only really enjoyed it, but it made me rethink a number of concepts (primarily feminist ones) that I had earlier written off, as well as introduced me entirely new ones.

I had tried to read this five or six years ago but stopped since the language was too complicated for me. Reading it again now (with a few more years of academic-type reading under my belt and with friends) it was a little easier.

Themes and parts of the book that moved and impacted me the most:

Capitalism was a reaction by those in power to the (failed) peasant revolts of the 1200 and 1300s. Mercantilism (and then capitalism) takes into consideration the demands of the enserfed peasants as a means of recuperation and offers waged based work. This new form of managing work/labor has it's benefits such as increased freedom of mobility, but leads to wage slavery and much more strict and fucked up social roles and ultimately is much more controlling. For example, women weren't allowed to live without men in their household, they couldn't be in public without men and in extreme example were not even allowed to look out the windows of their homes (now places of confinement).

All of this is forced on women, it is not "natural", it wasn't happening for centuries. It's a concise era that can be pointed to, along with laws being passed and the views of rulers, philosophers, editors, etc. encouraging this new, extremist thinking. The depreciation and devaluing of women wasn't a problem of medieval thinking or fluke in the development of capitalism, but an intricate, vital part of it.

With the enclosure of the commons, people in general lost a lot of autonomy, but women lost the only women-only place they were allowed to legally have. As a result women often lead the fiercest resistance to the enclosure - tearing down fences and hedges, the main signs of and means of enclosure. Men will eventually be offered women as a consolation prize for losing agency once had by the commons. Apparently enough of the bastards took the offer. "A new "sexual contract" . . . was forged, defining women in terms - mothers, wives, daughters, widows - that hid their status as workers, while giving men free access to women's bodies, their labor, and the bodies and labor of their children. According to this new social-sexual contract, proletarian women became for male workers the substitute for the land lost to the enclosures, their most basic means of reproduction, and a communal good anyone could appropriate and use at will. . . . But in the new organization of work *every woman . . . became a communal good*, for once women's activities were defined as non-work, women's labor began to appear as a natural resource, available to all, no less than the air we breathe or the water we drink. . . . For in pre-capitalist Europe women's subordination to men had been tempered by the fact that they had access to the commons and other communal assets, while in the new capitalist regime *women themselves became the commons*, as their work was defined as a natural resource, laying outside the sphere of market relations."

In a similar way that dis-empowered, working men are told that if nothing else they can at least have control over their wives and children, through mechanical thinking (emerging as common philosophical, enlightment thinking that now dominates much of our take on our own bodies) we are all told that if nothing else we can at least control, rule over and be sovereigns of our own bodies. People are taught to think of each other as mere bodies to do work and even more that our bodies are only machines. Among other things, it appears that because of this (and extreme punishments dished out by the inquisition) we have the modern concept of our bodies being something separate from ourselves. That we have an intellect that needs to keep our bodies under control. All of this re-enforces and amplifies the ideas that have at times been held by a minority of reactionaries, such as the intrinsic evil and wretchedness of humanity and the filthiness of the body/nature.

Finally, I had often heard a lot said, usually vaguely about how the witch-hunts were an era when powerful women and a lot of wisdom relating to things like health, the body, contraception was lost, but it was incredibly powerful and moving to hear the specifics of that. After a while, practicing contraception, infanticide, abortion, certain kinds of health treatment in general became capital offences, as well as resisting the implementation of those laws. This was made all the more clear to me when Federici talks about the execution and burnings as public events, and then I realized how seriously it must have been to watch your mother or sister or daughter or friend or grandmother being burned alive for using contraception. "Just as enclosures expropriated the peasantry from the communal land, so the witch-hunt expropriated women from their bodies, which were thus "liberated" from any impediment preventing them to function as machines for the production of labor. For the threat of the stake erected more formidable barriers around women's bodies than were ever erected by the fencing off of the commons."

All of this is part of the disciplining of the social body in order to make it fit within the realm of work/production. Magic was and can be subversive as far as it teaches people they can get things without "working hard" and "making sacrifices."


As I got towards the end of the book, I kept thinking, "When is Federici going to talk about examples of collective/mass resistance to the witch-burning / heretics hunts?" And then I sadly came across this section:

"That [the witch-hunts] successfully divided women from men is suggested by the fact that, despite individual attempts by sons, husbands, or fathers to save their female relatives from the stake, with one exception, we have no record of any male organizations opposing the persecution." Federici then tells about a fleet of fishermen who got word that their mothers and wives were being tortured and executed. They rushed home and the inquisitor fled, never to return. It's infuriating that it would have initially been that easy to save hundreds of thousands of lives, but people were not able to organize themselves. But there must be other examples of resisting this holocaust and I want that history.

Something I really appreciated about this text (that reminds me of books by Marcus Rediker and Peter Linebaugh) is Federici's insistence that all these fucked up things were intricate and necessary for the development of the systems that now run our lives, and that many of these injustices still exist and are necessary in keeping capitalism running. An interested "sequel" to Caliban I think would be The Many Headed Hydra - it picks up right around the time that Caliban is leaving off. While Caliban focuses a lot on gender touching often on race in regards to class, The Many Headed Hydra talks a lot about the development of race touching often on gender in regards to class.


4.7

----------------------------
Summer 2018

I've debated a fair amount whether I should add this update, but here it is.

I carry Caliban and the Witch in my book distro, A Boulder on the Tracks, on a sliding scale of $12-20. My intention with the distro is not to turn a profit, and any money I make goes back into acquiring more titles or sending books to prisoners. $12 is what I pay for them, and as far as I know it's the cheapest one can get a new copy for. Pardon the self-promotion!

http://aboulder.com/product/caliban-a...

[julieta · Rating 5 out of 5]

Me encantó!
Aunque pasé la mitad del tiempo queriendo empezar una revolución. Me gusta mucho como va preparando el terreno, contando cómo fueron cambiando las cosas en las tierras primero comunitarias, que después fueron privatizadas, y el lugar que tenían las mujeres en los movimientos herejes.
Al haber crecido en una cultura capitalista me ha faltado mucha información sobre el cómo parte un sistema económico.
Creo que estamos en un buen momento para reflexionar sobre muchos temas que plantea Federici aquí, no solo por su ángulo feminista, y como la misoginia fue entrando en todos los aspectos de la sociedad, y como han ido moviendo la historia, sino también hacer una enorme reflexión de el momento en el que estamos ahora, cómo nos hemos alejado de la naturaleza, y cómo podemos empezar a prepararnos mental y emocionalmente para un mundo que requiere toda nuestra presencia y participación.
Un gran libro para empezar a sacudir las certezas, hacernos preguntas, y ver nuevas posibles direcciones para seguir aprendiendo.

[Gabriel Gaybraham · Rating 5 out of 5]

1) oops now all i want to talk about is the enclosures of the commons
2) funny how i really like marxist analysis now and again, mostly when applied to factors marxists (in my experience) seriously downplay. such as "slavery, without which capitalism would never have gotten off the ground, but like who cares right, blah blah wage labor blah"
3) it is so useful as history, as making the (western) world make sense. i want every leftist i know to read it for filling in the gaps in How Things Got To Where They Are according to marx and foucault who both really like to conveniently ignore stuff. i want every neopagan i know to read it because it simultaneously turns the myth of the burning times into an actual history with an actual impact, and blows holes in the revitalized/nostalgic contemporary practice of witchcraft--essentially, the reason you can cast yr spells in safety now is they no longer serve as an excuse for a campaign of terror necessary for building the social order nor constitute subversion of that social order
4) "roving band of medieval heretics who don't really believe in gender and do believe that the second coming of christ means burn shit down" is my politics

[Thomas · Rating 4 out of 5]

Super interesting book about the transition from feudalism to capitalism and how capitalism intersected with the witch hunts to oppress and demonize women. As I read more about capitalism, I find it such an injustice that I did not learn more about it in high school or even college (though I recognize my own upper middle-class background shielded me from having to learn about it from life experience directly.) Silvia Federici references Marx and Foucault while also filling in the gender-related gaps in their arguments. Namely, she conveys how the intersection of capitalism and sexism dismantled solidarity between workers through the subjugation of women to men. She draws parallels to slavery as well as other historic injustices and events to further cement her case.

I think I can recognize the intelligence of this work, though the more academic writing style dulled it a bit for me, which is totally a subjective preference thing (as all ratings are, I suppose) as opposed to a quality thing. I’m glad to have learned more about the origins of capitalism and found her commentary on how capitalism separates workers from their bodies quite apt and insightful. It’s wild that as much as we touch on the witch hunts, we don’t learn about them in this particular feminist lens, though the anti-feminist underpinnings of the witch hunts become almost impossible to unsee once you see them. Recommended for those who are interested in the historical intersections of capitalism and sexism in relation to the witch hunts and the transition from feudalism to capitalism.

[Vartika · Rating 3 out of 5]

In Caliban and the Witch, Silvia Federici offers a fascinating and horrible analysis of the Middle Ages through Feminist, Marxist, and Foucauldian lenses, attempting to recenter the social and sexual subjugation of women as a project essential to the development of Capitalism in a hitherto feudal Europe.
While impressive and generally highly-rated, certain aspects of Federici's methodology don't do well in the light, thus necessitating one approaches it with a degree of distance. This long review is mostly a reminder to myself as to why.

The Bewitching Thesis
In Capital, Marx explains that structural conditions for the existence of capitalism were created by 'primitive accumulation,' a process of violent dispossession and the enclosure of land that led to the formation of the proletariat and provided the impetus for developing capitalist industry. In Federici's view, Marx ignores that the subjugation of women was as just as crucial to this process, and was—she says—instrumental too in the racial brutalisation and enslavement of the native population of the New World.

Federici is theoretically motivated to prove that "women's history" is not separate from the history of the working-class male but is integral to "class history." First, Federici looks at the social reproduction of labour: how the control and manipulation of the ability to replenish the workforce (through reproduction, childcare, nourishment, domestic maintenance, etc.) required the sexual division of labour in order to produce surplus value. Further, according to her, Capitalism required not only the redefinition of bodies and their coercion into self-disciplining workers, but also the division of the proletariat along identitarian lines in order to weaken the resistance peasant rebellions posed to the status quo, especially after the Plague.

This, she goes on to argue, was achieved through the (massively understudied) Witch Hunts, used to both discipline and punish subversive and heretic women and sow suspicion amongst proletarian society to turn them against each other, men against women. Similarly, she says, followed the demonisation of non-Europeans, who were colonised and divided to be employed as an expendable labour force crucial to the Capitalist ecosystem. Thus the Shakespearean figures of Caliban and the witch Sycorax take their place within Federeci's theoretical framework, where the Witch, a hitherto marginalised figure, is acknowledged as a central one alongside the affects of her being Caliban's mother.

Federici thus posits her arguments with regards to this period opposite the supposed enrichment brought about by the Enlightenment, arguing that for women and people of colour it ushered in the beginnings of veritable darkness. She also goes on to argue that unlike Marx's supposition, Capitalism must always operate by force of repression, and that the process of 'primitive accumulation' and scapegoating of others cannot cease: under the current phase of Globalisation, it has only intensified, as seen in the resurgence of violence (and, as she points out, witch hunts) in 'Global South' countries like Nigeria after their adoption of the IMF's Structural Adjustment Program in the 1980s.

Interesting, isn't it?

The Glaring (?) Issues
On the face of it, Caliban and the Witch presents a compelling argument, boosted, no doubt, by the stellar research and historiography its fat list of references and endnotes suggest. I was quite impressed by many of its assertions—and it does assert some excellent points—but the neatness with which all of Federici's arguments fit together, along with her polemical style of writing, made my ears prick up a little.

While Caliban and the Witch does rightly point at how certain suppositions Marx made in Capital do not seem to hold up, none of these observations are particularly original: true, violence remains essential to Capitalism 500 years on (although it may be argued that we are not as far into the late stages with their pure exploitation as we suppose, even as we are fast approaching it). Similarly, whereas her criticism of Foucault's ignorance of male domination and female sexuality in his History of Sexuality are well taken, his decision not to focus on repressive tactics used in bringing about a regime of sexual control is just that—a decision.

The above is harmless critique, but Federici is at times given to manipulation-by-omission too. For instance, she makes Marx say that capitalism represents an emancipation, while to the best of my knowledge he argued that the advent of capitalism, for the first time in history, set conditions for future emancipation. She also tries to assert that medieval feudalism could have directly given way to a socialist society, which is an argument that many theorists from the Global South has given voice to, except that in Federici's case there is no attempt at following through with or creating a real case for it when so much of her analysis hinges on such a claim. Moreover, even as she echoes these anti-imperial critiques, her writing in this book (perhaps unconsciously) generalises and presents the feudal structures of Europe as the 'global' condition, and the women here as representative of women everywhere—yikes! Certain sections of Caliban and the Witch also misconstrue correlations between two historically observed phenomenon into causation, which feels sloppy, and Federici often devolves into single-axis analysis of oppression and ahistorical claim-making, which leads to some strange assertions including one about Catholic church's appropriation of womenswear.

Some consider her 'exaggeration' of the extent of the witch hunt in Europe most discrediting to an otherwise commendable work: most professional historians estimate the number of witch-hunt victims to be between 40,000 and 60,000, whereas Federici takes the highest estimated figure of 100,000, and proceeds with an idea of "hundreds of thousands" of women being persecuted. I understand where this tension comes from, but is recorded history not known to under-report figures such as these? I find Federici's figures here an acknowledgement of and corrective against the same, and not entirely unwelcome in that.

What I do consider discrediting is her flattening of 'heretical' movements into one, grand, consolidated movement, which is historically inaccurate, and her cherrypicking of sources that support her thesis while ignoring those that speak otherwise (the neatness with which the narrative of her argument fits together thus starts making sense). Though this is a political choice, it comes with its costs and labels her book as significantly unreliable. This is an academic gymnastic that I personally find hard to reconcile myself with in a lot of feminist scholarship and especially feminist history, since hostile critics often latch onto it to discredit feminisms and feminist philosophy on the whole.

I wouldn't discourage those interested from reading this, but I would recommend bringing your own critical lens and a pinch of salt.

[Tiffany Vecchietti · Rating 5 out of 5]

Terza rilettura, è uno dei miei saggi preferiti e ogni volta trovo incredibile la connessione politica, storica e sociale del lavoro di Federici.

[Sunny Lu · Rating 5 out of 5]

I learned so much! marxist feminism is amazing

[The Conspiracy is Capitalism · Rating 5 out of 5]

Capitalism’s The Handmaid's Tale…

Preamble:
--Margaret Atwood describes her best-seller novel The Handmaid's Tale as “speculative fiction” based on historical nonfiction. Let’s dive into that history with Federici’s tome…
--In my re-prioritization to actually finish/review the books that I reference the most, I can add this gem to:
i) Perilous Passage: Mankind and the Global Ascendancy of Capital
ii) The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values

Highlights:

--The premise of this book is to challenge the depoliticized framing of mainstream history, using a historical materialist framework (political bargaining power from relations with material conditions), with particular focus on reproduction.
--The specific challenge is on the political struggles behind the witch-hunts (1450-1750); Federici maps out the following:

1) Feudalism’s Contradictions:
--With the breakdown of imperial Rome’s slave economy, serfdom emerged between the 5-7th centuries.
--To prevent revolt/flight to maroon communities, feudal landlords had to compromise by granting former slaves/free agricultural workers their own plot of land which they could pass down to their own family. Serfs also had access to the “commons” (meadows/forests/lakes/wild pastures). Thus, despite being bonded to the landlords, the masses now had some direct access to the means of reproduction.
--12-13th century shift towards “commutation”, where feudal “labour services” shifted into money payments (rents/taxes), created further class distinctions (indebted proletariat).

2) Anti-Feudalism: Golden Age of the European Proletariat:
--Given the contradictions of expectation to land access amidst increasing debt-driven land dispossession, anti-feudal social movements (“land to the tillers”/access to Commons/communal self-administration) escalated.
--The Great Famine (1315-1322) set the stage for the Black Death (1346-1353). With the systemic crisis’ labour shortage and land abundance, workers’ bargaining power rose, leading to wide-spread strikes on rent/labour services/military service.
--Millenarian movements are described as based on spontaneous events/charismatic leaders, thus tended to collapse when met with force.
--Heretic movements are described as well-organized, leading to long-term resistance vs. crusades. These movements (esp. Cathars/Waldensies; others include The Poor of Lyon, Spirituals, Apostolics) denounced social hierarchies/private property/accumulation of wealth, insisting on a spiritual renewal and social justice (think “Liberation Theology”).
…Federici emphases that these were political protest movements rather than merely deviations in orthodox religion: these were a first in the Middle Ages: revolution of daily life/work/property/reproduction/gender roles (thus, grassroots women’s movements), indeed the first “proletarian international” given its support network via commercial fairs/pilgrimages/persecuted refugees.
--Anti-feudalism movements basically ended serfdom, leading to the “golden age of the European proletariat” (living standards unparalleled until the 19th century) which was at the same time (1350-1500) an accumulation crisis for elites (feudal lords/patrician merchants/Church).

3) Elite Counter-Revolution: Capitalism:
--We see above that it was grassroots movements that ended feudalism, rather than a “progressive”/“evolutionary” capitalism replacing feudalism.
--The elites responded to revive their accumulation in the standard manner: brute violence and divide-and-rule scapegoating, i.e. “primitive accumulation”. Note: this term has baggage since Adam Smith coined it to describe capitalists earning their initial (“primitive”, i.e. previous) accumulation through hard work, which Marx later refutes (“so-called primitive accumulation”) by revealing the history of violent capitalist dispossession.
--Eastern Europe: the “second serfdom” was introduced to farmers (who never experienced serfdom), with production now geared for the global market (rise of capitalism).
--Western Europe: attempts to revive serfdom and (Roman-era) slavery were resisted (with some slavery successes in the Mediterranean). More successful was the development of capitalism:
i) Price Revolution (1580-1640):
--Increased money-commodification of social relations (for big picture, see: Debt: The First 5,000 Years), leading to price inflation (which started before the inflow of precious metals from the colonization of the Americas) which wage income could not keep up with; real wages did not recover until 19th century. Medieval demands for liberty/leisure time eroded into bread riots/property crimes.
ii) Enclosures:
--Land privatization where serfs lost their plot of land/access to Commons. This also destroyed social life (see later).
iii) Bloody Laws:
--The 16-17th century featured the first capitalist crisis: the former serfs, dispossessed of land, had nothing left but to sell their labour (proletariat) to the rising capitalism. However, they hated wage labour (“wage slavery”) so much that many refused and became “masterless” vagabonds.
…Thus, the state had to impose violent laws to enforce a sufficient labour market for capitalism (The Invention of Capitalism: Classical Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation).
…Federici ties this with how elites weaponized the rise of science: “mechanical philosophy”/anatomy aimed to control nature/human nature, to discipline and mechanize the proletariat body. The body was rendered inert and separate from the mind, rather than the traditional animist world-view (no separation between matter/spirit; cosmos as living organism; we can connect this to “indigenous” world-view/relations).
...Animals became inert (clockwork) and tortured. Self-discipline (Descartes’ mind over body; decentralized to the individual) combined with bloody laws (Hobbes’ state leviathan). “Magic kills industry”, complained another early scientist (Francis Bacon); the proletariat had to be standardized/disciplined/mechanized.
…however, Federici concludes the above was still insufficient for the capitalist labour market. The capitalist state had to control reproduction, to ensure population growth (really sounds like The Handmaid’s Tale).

…see comments below for rest of the review (witch-hunts)…

[Sara Salem · Rating 5 out of 5]

I haven't read a book this fascinating for a while. Federici looks at the hundreds of thousands of women who were murdered in Europe in the 16th century after being accused of being witches and shows how this was because of the transition to capitalism and the need to destroy the solidarity between workers through demonizing women and turning men against them. She also clearly connects this to imperialism. I especially liked how she used both Foucault and Marx and yet makes important criticisms of both.

[Liz · Rating 5 out of 5]

I'm kind of obsessed with this book.

[Baba Yaga Reads · Rating 5 out of 5]

Petizione per sostituire il testo della Bibbia con quello di Calibano e la strega.

[Natalie · Rating 5 out of 5]

Oh my. This book.

I kept wanting to devour the whole thing, but I had to stop every few pages because it overwhelmed me so much. I haven't learned so much from one book in a very long time.

Parts of this were quite emotional for me. It's not often that non-fiction gets me choked up. Looking back at the history of peasant subjugation, land privatization, witch-hunting, and the creation of capitalism from a historical perpsective made our human errors seem so brazen and clear. I just can't believe we let this all happen! We spend so much time arguing about different things in our society (racism, sexism, inequality, poverty, the role of the state, etc.), but if we don't have an understanding of what gave rise to the status quo, there is no way we can realistically hope to change it.

I am terrible at writing book reviews. But this is seriously one of the most incredible books I have ever read. Federici blew my mind.

If this is what reading feminist Marxist works is always like, GIMME SOME MORE!

In short, you simply must must must read it. ASAP.

[Vincent · Rating 1 out of 5]

Look, I'm a communist and a feminist but I cannot in good conscience give this wildly... "imaginative" history more than one star. The history contained in this book from its inaccurate portrayals of Medieval views on contraception, to its spurious claims about the persecution of Midwives, to its belief that Ius Primae Noctis was actually a thing... this book is intellectually lazy poorly sourced garbage by someone whose grasp of history is tenuous at best. Also the claim that the Catholic Church adopted "women's clothing" is absurd, it was just Byzantine dress.

[Karolina · Rating 5 out of 5]

4.5

Pod koniec zrobiło się nieco chaotycznie, ale dawno żadna książka nie wywołała we mnie tylu rozkmin (i wkurwu). Nie ma co liczyć na to, że sytuacja kobiet na świecie ma szansę się szybko poprawić, jeśli proces ich wykluczania i demonizowania trwa od dobrych 700 lat…

[Lydia S.P. · Rating 5 out of 5]

Σπουδαίο βιβλίο. Δεν θα το έλεγα ακριβώς ιστορία, αλλά περισσότερο μια πολύ εμπεριστατωμένη κριτική του αναδυόμενου καπιταλιστικού συστήματος την περίοδο της πρώιμης νεωτερικότητας σε σχέση με το πως αντιμετώπισε τη γυναίκα και τη θέση της στη νέα κοινωνική και οικονομική πραγματικότητα (βλ. περιφράξεις κοινοτικών γαιών και πρωταρχική συσσώρευση), χρησιμοποιώντας ανάμεσα σε άλλες πρακτικές εξαναγκασμού και την απόλυτη τρομοκρατία του κυνηγιού μαγισσών. Η Σίλβια Φεντερίτσι είναι καυστικότατη, στηρίζει όμως τη θέση της σε μια πολύ μεγάλη βιβλιογραφία και καταρρίπτει πολλές από τις ψευδαισθήσεις της μέινστριμ ιστοριογραφίας για την περίοδο της Αναγέννησης και του Διαφωτισμού.

[X-ray · Rating 5 out of 5]

Η Ιταλοαμερικανίδα συγγραφέας διατυπώνει με πολύ εύστοχο τρόπο τη βασική της θέση στη σελίδα 35 του βιβλίου ως εξής: «Το σώμα για τις γυναίκες στην καπιταλιστική κοινωνία έχει γίνει ό,τι το εργοστάσιο για τους άρρενες μισθωτούς εργάτες: το κύριο πεδίο της εκμετάλλευσής τους και της αντίστασης, καθώς το γυναικείο σώμα έγινε αντικείμενο οικειοποίησης από το κράτος και τους άνδρες και υποχρεώθηκε να λειτουργεί ως μέσο αναπαραγωγής και συσσώρευσης της εργασίας».

Αυτό το φαινόμενο που ονομάστηκε «πρωταρχική συσσώρευση», η οποία ιστορικά συμβολίζεται από τις περιφράξεις γης στην Αγγλία, με όλη την τρομακτική βία απέναντι στα φτωχά στρώματα της υπαίθρου, την προλεταριοποίηση και την εξαθλίωση μεγάλου μέρους του πληθυσμού, την εξάρθρωση του κοινοτισμού και των πλούσιων μορφών λαϊκού πολιτισμού, την καταστολή της λαϊκής ελευθεριότητας και την αυταρχική κανονικοποίηση του κοινωνικού σώματος -ό,τι σήμαινε δηλαδή ο λεγόμενος αστικός «εξορθολογισμός»-, που οδήγησε σε όσα ο Μισέλ Φουκώ περιγράφει στις δικές του ιστορίες ως «ο μεγάλος εγκλεισμός», δεν είναι κάτι το οποίο συνέβη άπαξ, στις απαρχές της νεωτερικότητας, αλλά κάτι που επαναλαμβάνεται κανονικά, ύστερα από κάθε σοβαρή κρίση του καπιταλισμού (το οποίο ξαναζούμε άλλωστε στις μέρες μας). Αν αυτή η ιδέα από μόνη της είναι μια αξιοσημείωτη συμβολή της Φεντερίτσι στη μαρξιστική θεωρία, η ακόμη σημαντικότερη συμβολή της στη φεμινιστική θεωρία έγκειται στην επισήμανση ότι θεμελιώδης όρος του ανερχόμενου καπιταλισμού ήταν η «περίφραξη» επίσης των γυναικείων σωμάτων μέσω της ποινικοποίησης του ελέγχου των γυναικών επί της σεξουαλικότητάς τους κι επί της παραγωγικής τους δυνατότητας, ταυτόχρονα με την απαξίωση της αναπαραγωγικής εργασίας και της κοινωνικής τους θέσης, τον αποκλεισμό τους δηλαδή από τις έμμισθες εργασιακές σχέσεις και τον εγκλεισμό στην οικιακή «ιδιωτικότητα». Αυτός ο άνισος κατά φύλο καταμερισμός της εργασίας, κάνοντας αόρατη την εργασία των γυναικών στην αναπαραγωγή της εργατικής δύναμης (αποϊστορικοποιώντας τη δηλαδή ως κάτι το απλώς «φυσικό»), έχει αποκρύψει εκτεταμένες περιοχές της ανθρώπινης εκμετάλλευσης κι έχει επιβάλει την καθυπόταξη των γυναικών στους άνδρες ως κατεξοχήν νεωτερική και αστική μορφή κυριαρχίας.

Η Σίλβια Φεντερίτσι ξεδιπλώνει στα μάτια μας με θαυμαστή δεξιοτεχνία τη ζωή των ύστερο-μεσαιωνικών κοινοτήτων και την πανταχού παρουσία των γυναικών σε αυτές· τα μεγάλα κινήματα θρησκευτικής ανταρσίας ως επαναστάσεις των φτωχών που διεκδικούν πάντα κατά βάθος δικαιοσύνη και ισότητα και τον ρόλο των γυναικών στις γραμμές τους· τη βαθιά οικονομική και δημογραφική κρίση του 16ου αιώνα, που οδήγησε στην «αντεπανάσταση του καπιταλισμού», η οποία έμελλε να ζωγραφίσει εικόνες αποκαλυψιακής δυστυχίας μετατρέποντας την Ευρώπη και μια στιγμή μετά τις αποικίες σε ένα τεράστιο στρατόπεδο συγκεντρώσεως: περιφράξεις γαιών, κυνήγι των μαγισσών, μαζικοί απαγχονισμοί των πεινασμένων, το σημάδεμα, το μαστίγωμα και η φυλάκιση πλάνητων και ζητιάνων στα νεοδημιουργημένα άσυλα υποχρεωτικής εργασίας, εξόντωση των ιθαγενών πληθυσμών του Νέου Κόσμου στις φυτείες και στα ορυχεία και τα πρώτα καράβια με σκλάβους από την Αφρική στον ορίζοντα. Όλη η κοσμογονική ωμότητα που γέννησε τον νεωτερικό, «εξορθολογισμένο» κόσμο στον οποίον ακόμη ζούμε, η αληθινή ταυτότητα της Ευρώπης και του καπιταλισμού ως ιστορικής μορφής.

[Kate Savage · Rating 5 out of 5]

I went into this book knowing that Federici has been criticized for exaggerating the extent of the witch hunt in Europe. So I was enheartened to find this book is about so much more than that. The witch hunt is one example of a war against women, which itself ultimately served as a way to break the strength of poor and working class people. Misogyny destroys resistance in a way analogous to how white supremacy and the invention of race-based chattel slavery broke solidarity between white and black poor people in the colonies. The peasant class had their land stolen, but men were bought off with patriarchy, as women became the new 'commons.'

The most fascinating part for me was Federici's argument that the birth of capitalism required a cultural shift in our ideas about bodies. Capitalism can't function while bodies are sacred and their pleasure and care are prioritized. Bodies have to be neutralized, divided into inert parts that can be controlled by the needs of industry. That chapter alone made the book 5 stars for me.

[tara bomp · Rating 5 out of 5]

Fascinating and incredibly important book. Covers the history of the end of feudalism, the rise of capitalism, the rise of current patriarchal forms, colonialism, witch hunts and more. Makes it clear that capitalism was founded on the oppression of women and with massive resistance every step of the way. Shows the importance of reproductive control. Talks about the oppressive elements of philosophy from the time. Covers so much that it skips some historical detail but it doesn't matter. An essential book for correcting the male centred perspectives of today as well as linking social rebellion of now to the past. Read this if you're at all interested in feminism or anti-capitalism.

edit: i feel obliged to somewhat temper what i said above 18 months later. I've read fragments about problems with historiography in the book, particularly http://libcom.org/blog/witch-hunts-tr... and reading bits and pieces people who've immersed themselves in the witchhunt literature have said. from what i understand, much of the problem is that a lot more information and research has come out in the last 30-40 years that gives a very different understanding of the political, sociological and legal aspects of it - see http://www.kersplebedeb.com/mystuff/f.... the problem is this book focuses on older sources (and has the problem of not always citing properly) which means it uses some inaccurate information and has only a limited perspective simply because the information wasn't widely available or understood at the time the book was written (probably). as someone who's not read other witch hunt stuff i can't comment in detail and I've not seen a more comprehensive criticism, i just think it's important to note and to make sure you don't take all the history as gospel. that's not to smear the book and i still stand by it being a very interesting and important book politically and it's still full of useful history. just wanted to put up some new information

[Zach Carter · Rating 5 out of 5]

There are a few books whose effect on me is so profound that it marks an inflection point in my understanding of history and theory: Walter Rodney's "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa"; Frantz Fanon's "The Wretched of the Earth"; and Gerald Horne's "The Counterrevolution of 1776" are perhaps at the top of the list. With Silvia Federici's "Caliban and the Witch" I find a new entry. The level of detail she provides to offer an incisive critique of Marx's analysis of primitive accumulation in the "transition" from feudalism to capitalism is astounding. Admittedly, the Middle Ages in Europe is a period I have not read nearly enough about, and suffice it to say, I was blown away with what I didn't know. She links the mass execution of hundreds of thousands of heretics and witches - both in Europe and in the colonies in America - to the enclosure of land and the conversion of the body into a machine. In fact, she goes further: "the witch-hunt was, at least in part, an attempt to criminalize birth control and place the female body, the uterus, at the service of population increase and the production and accumulation of labor-power"

As it relates to the expansion of colonialism in the New World, she says "the counterparts of the typical European witch, then, were not the Renaissance magicians, but the colonized native Americans and the enslaved Africans who, in the plantations of the "New World" shared a destiny similar to that of women in Europe, providing for capital the seemingly limitless supply of labor necessary for accumulation."

I think one of the more powerful claims she makes has to do with the totality and institutionalization of mass murder of women, calling it a war on women. In fact, she goes on, the witch-hunt was the first unifying terrain in the politics of the new European nation-state, the first example, after the schism brought about by the Reformation, of a European unification.

There are so many other points I wish I could go into here, but I'll just say this: it is a full analysis of communalism, feudalism, and capitalism, and the role that women played (and play) in each social formation. Reading this work and understanding the crucial positioning of women allows a more nuanced understanding of the "inevitability" of capitalism, the "transition" period between feudalism and capitalism, and, as she brilliantly describes, how it was in the torture chambers and on the stakes on which the witches perished that the bourgeois ideals of womanhood and domesticity were forged.

[Willow Heath]

Caliban and the Witch is the kind of history book that will be highlighted, annotated, and dog-eared to the point of being unreadable by the time you turn the final page (my copy certainly is). This nonfiction is a blend of history, sociology, and political philosophy that explores the relationship between the rise of capitalism and the subjugation of the bodies of women and minority people to better serve patriarchal hierarchies in Europe.

My full thoughts: https://booksandbao.com/best-history-...

[Anna Ricco · Rating 5 out of 5]

Decisamente il miglior saggio letto finora. La Federici è molto chiara e asciutta, le note sono estremamente significative (in alcuni punti più interessanti del testo) i suoi studi sono approfonditi e ben fatti,e ti tengono letteralmente incollata alle pagine. Calibano e la strega è in libro potente: ci descrive in modo sintetico tutte le vicende di tre secoli di storia,da un punto di vista inedito che è quello femminista.. la caccia alle streghe è solo una parte di questo saggio! Ma si parla anche del ruolo delle donne nelle rivolte contadine, durante la colonizzazione delle Americhe, nei movimenti eretici di cristianizzazione.. è un libro di violenza,abusi e denigrazioni, di immagini forti e riflessioni illuminate. Consigliato a tutti.

[Alex · Rating 5 out of 5]

Who Were the Witches? – Patriarchal Terror and the Creation of Capitalism
Alex Knight
November 5, 2009

This Halloween season, there is no book I could recommend more highly than Silvia Federici’s brilliant Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation, which tells the dark saga of the Witch Hunt that consumed Europe for more than 200 years. In uncovering this forgotten history, Federici exposes the origins of capitalism in the heightened oppression of workers (represented by Shakespeare’s character Caliban), and most strikingly, in the brutal subjugation of women. She also brings to light the enormous and colorful European peasant movements that fought against the injustices of their time, connecting their defeat to the imposition of a new patriarchal order that divided male from female workers. Today, as more and more people question the usefulness of a capitalist system that has thrown the world into crisis, Caliban and the Witch stands out as essential reading for unmasking the shocking violence and inequality that capitalism has relied upon from its very creation.

Who Were the Witches?

Parents putting a pointed hat on their young son or daughter before Trick-or-Treating might never pause to wonder this question, seeing witches as just another cartoonish Halloween icon like Frankenstein’s monster or Dracula. But deep within our ritual lies a hidden history that can tell us important truths about our world, as the legacy of past events continues to affect us 500 years later. In this book, Silvia Federici takes us back in time to show how the mysterious figure of the witch is key to understanding the creation of capitalism, the profit-motivated economic system that now reigns over the entire planet.

During the 15th – 17th centuries the fear of witches was ever-present in Europe and Colonial America, so much so that if a woman was accused of witchcraft she could face the cruellest of torture until confession was given, or even be executed based on suspicion alone. There was often no evidence whatsoever. The author recounts, “for more than two centuries, in several European countries, hundreds of thousands of women were tried, tortured, burned alive or hanged, accused of having sold body and soul to the devil and, by magical means, murdered scores of children, sucked their blood, made potions with their flesh, caused the death of their neighbors, destroyed cattle and crops, raised storms, and performed many other abominations” (169). In other words, just about anything bad that might or might not have happened was blamed on witches during that time. So where did this tidal wave of hysteria come from that took the lives so many poor women, most of whom had almost certainly never flown on broomsticks or stirred eye-of-newt into large black cauldrons?

Caliban underscores that the persecution of witches was not just some error of ignorant peasants, but in fact the deliberate policy of Church and State, the very ruling class of society. To put this in perspective, today witchcraft would be a far-fetched cause for alarm, but the fear of hidden terrorists who could strike at any moment because they “hate our freedom” is widespread. Not surprising, since politicians and the media have been drilling this frightening message into people’s heads for years, even though terrorism is a much less likely cause of death than, say, lack of health care.1 And just as the panic over terrorism has enabled today’s powers-that-be to attempt to remake the Middle East, this book makes the case that the powers-that-were of Medieval Europe exploited or invented the fear of witches to remake European society towards a social paradigm that met their interests.

Interestingly, a major component of both of these crusades was the use of so-called “shock and awe” tactics to astound the population with “spectacular displays of force,” which help to soften up resistance to drastic or unpopular reforms.2 In the case of the Witch Hunt, shock therapy was applied through the witch burnings – spectacles of such stupefying violence that they apparently paralyzed whole villages and regions into accepting fundamental restructuring of medieval society.3 Federici describes a typical witch burning as, “an important public event, which all the members of the community had to attend, including the children of the witches, especially their daughters who, in some cases, would be whipped in front of the stake on which they could see their mother burning alive” (186).

The book argues that these gruesome executions not only punished “witches” but graphically demonstrated the repercussions for any kind of disobedience to the clergy or nobility. In particular, the witch burnings were meant to terrify women into accepting “a new patriarchal order where women’s bodies, their labor, their sexual and reproductive powers were placed under the control of the state and transformed into economic resources” (170). Federici puts forward that up until the 16th century, though living in a sexist society, European women retained significant economic independence from men that they typically do not under capitalism, where gender roles are more distinguished. She goes on, “If we also take into account that in medieval society collective relations prevailed over familial ones, and most of the tasks that female serfs performed (washing, spinning, harvesting, and tending to animals on the commons) were done in cooperation with other women, we then realize… [this:] was a source of power and protection for women. It was the basis for an intense female sociality and solidarity that enabled women to stand up to men.” But the Witch Hunt initiated a period where women were forced to become what she calls “servants of the male work force” (115) – excluded from receiving a wage, they were confined to the unpaid labor of raising children, caring for the elderly and sick, nurturing their husbands or partners, and maintaining the home. In Federici’s words, this was the “housewifization of women,” the reduction to a second-class status where women became totally dependent on the income of men (27).

Federici goes on to show how female sexuality, which was seen as a source of women’s potential power over men, became an object of suspicion and came under sharp attack by the authorities. The assault manifested in new laws that took away women’s control over the reproductive process, such as the banning of birth control measures, the replacement of midwives with male doctors, and the outlawing of abortion and infanticide.4 Federici calls this an attempt to turn the female body into “a machine for the reproduction of labor,” such that women’s only purpose in life was supposedly to produce children (144). But we also learn that this was just one component of a broader move by Church and State to ban all forms of sexuality that were considered “non-productive.” For example, “homosexuality, sex between young and old, sex between people of different classes, anal coitus, coitus from behind, nudity, and dances. Also proscribed was the public, collective sexuality that had prevailed in the Middle Ages, as in the Spring festivals of pagan origins that, in the 16th-century, were still celebrated all over Europe” (194). To this end, the Witch Hunt targeted not only female sexuality but homosexuality and gender non-conformity as well, helping to craft the patriarchal sexual boundaries that define our society to this day.

Capitalism - Born in Flames

What separates Caliban from other works exploring the “witch” phenomenon is that this book puts the persecution of witches into the context of the development of capitalism. For Silvia Federici, it’s no accident that “the witch-hunt occurred simultaneously with the colonization and extermination of the populations of the New World, the English enclosures, [or:] the beginning of the slave trade” (164). She instructs that all of these seemingly unrelated tragedies were initiated by the same European ruling elite at the very moment that capitalism was in formation, the late 15th through 17th centuries. Contrary to “laissez-faire” orthodoxy which holds that capitalism functions best without state intervention, Federici posits that it was precisely the state violence of these campaigns that laid the foundation for capitalist economics.

Thankfully for the reader, who may not be very familiar with the history of this era, Federici outlines these events in clear and accessible language. She focuses on the Land Enclosures in particular because their significance has been largely lost in time. Many of us will not remember that during Europe’s Middle Ages even the lowliest of serfs had their own plot of land with which they could use for just about any purpose. Federici adds, “With the use of land also came the use of the ‘commons’ – meadows, forests, lakes, wild pastures – that provided crucial resources for the peasant economy (wood for fuel, timber for building, fishponds, grazing grounds for animals) and fostered community cohesion and cooperation” (24). This access to land acted as a buffer, providing security for peasants who otherwise were mostly subject to the whim of their “Lord.” Not only could they grow their own food, or hunt in the relatively plentiful forests which were still standing in that era, but connection to the commons also gave peasants territory with which to organize resistance movements and alternative economies outside the control of their masters.

The Enclosures were a process by which this land was taken away – closed off by the State and typically handed over to entrepreneurs to pursue a profit in sheep or cow herding, or large-scale agriculture. Instead of being used for subsistence as it had been, the land’s bounty was sold off to fledgling national and international markets. A new class of profit-motivated landowners emerged, known as “gentry,” but the underside of this development was the trauma experienced by the evicted peasants. In the author’s words, “As soon as they lost access to land, all workers were plunged into a dependence unknown in medieval times, as their landless condition gave employers the power to cut their pay and lengthen the working-day” (72). For Federici, then, the chief creation of the Enclosures was a property-less, landless working class, a “proletariat” who were left with little option but to work for a wage in order to survive; wage labor being one of the defining features of capitalism.

Cut off from their traditional soil, many communities scattered across the countryside to find new homesteads. But the State countered with the so-called “Bloody Laws”, which made it legal to capture wandering “vagabonds” and force them to work for a wage, or put them to death. Federici tells the result: “What followed was the absolute impoverishment of the European working class… Evidence is the change that occurred in the workers’ diets. Meat disappeared from their tables, except for a few scraps of lard, and so did beer and wine, salt and olive oil” (77). Although European workers typically labored for longer hours under their new capitalist employers, living standards were reduced sharply throughout the 16th century, and it wasn’t until the middle of the 19th century that earnings returned to the level they had been before the Enclosures.5

According to Federici, the witch hunts played a key role in facilitating this process by driving a sexist wedge into the working class that “undermined class solidarity,” making it more difficult for communities to resist displacement (48). And while women were faced with the threat of horrific torture and death if they did not conform to new submissive gender roles, men were in effect bribed with the promise of obedient wives and new access to women’s bodies. The author cites that “Another aspect of the divisive sexual politics to diffuse workers’ protest was the institutionalization of prostitution, implemented through the opening of municipal brothels soon proliferating throughout Europe” (49). And in addition to prostitution, a legalization of sexual violence provided further sanction for the exploitation of women’s bodies. She explains, “In France, the municipal authorities practically decriminalized rape, provided the victims were women of the lower class” (47).

The witch trials were the final assault, which all but obliterated the integrity of peasant communities by fostering mutual suspicion and fear. Amidst deteriorating conditions, neighbors were encouraged to turn against one another, so that any insult or annoyance became grounds for an accusation of witchcraft. As the terror spread, a new era was forged in the flames of the witch burnings. Surveying the damage, Silvia Federici concludes that “the persecution of the witches, in Europe as in the New World, was as important as colonization and the expropriation of the European peasantry from its land were for the development of capitalism” (12).

A Forgotten Revolution

Federici maintains that it didn’t have to turn out this way. “Capitalism was not the only possible response to the crisis of feudal power. Throughout Europe, vast communalistic social movements and rebellions against feudalism had offered the promise of a new egalitarian society built on social equality and cooperation” (61).

Caliban’s most inspiring chapters make visible an enormous continent-wide series of poor people’s movements that nearly toppled Church and State at the end of the Middle Ages.

Continue review at http://endofcapitalism.com/2009/11/05...

[Clara · Rating 5 out of 5]

Si has entrado en contacto con el activismo feminista online, conoces a Silvia Federici en mayor o menor medida. Conoces su nombre, y conoces el contorno de sus teorías: la violencia capitalista contra las mujeres, los conceptos de trabajo emocional y trabajo de cuidados, la construcción de una economía monetaria que excluye a las mujeres de la retribución.

Es un verdadero placer llegar a una fuente de pensamiento original y que sea tan enriquecedora y potente como su impacto sugiere. Calibán y la bruja no sólo presenta una teoría profunda trabajada con una amplia documentación, sino que está excepcionalmente bien escrito, con un estilo limpio y elegante y clara vocación didáctica que llevan su mensaje muy lejos.

La densidad de los temas tratados y de sus citas pueden llegar a hacer la lectura pesada. He echado en falta un desarrollo más extenso a la teoría de las brujas –al contrario de lo que pueda parecer por su título, ocupa un 20% del volumen total del libro– pero en retrospectiva, cada capítulo es necesario para formar la tesis principal.

Federici ha conseguido algo que jamás pensé que ocurriría en mí: reconciliarme con el marxismo, construyendo sobre él con una perspectiva femenina crítica e imprescindible. Hace constar lo necesario que se hace el feminismo en todos los ámbitos y en todas las teorías humanísticas si realmente quieren llegar a ser revolucionarias.

Después de 300 y pico páginas se hace corto, y te deja con ganas de más porque sabes que ese ensayo da para mucho más: más horas de documentación, de ensayo, de consumo y de meditación. Te dona terreno para que plantes en él las semillas de tus propias ideas. Es formativo y revelador. Es imprescindible.

Leed a Federici. Siempre.

[Chiara Basile · Rating 5 out of 5]

Life changing totale
(Molto meno pop di quanto mi aspettassi, molto più storico: bellissimo)

[Az · Rating 5 out of 5]

Federici is a feminist philosopher working within the Italian post-autonomist marxist tradition. In Caliban and the Witch she addresses primitive accumulation, or a marxist analysis of the transition from feudalism to capitalism. Capitalism's beginnings, she argues, were not only about coercing bodies into becoming self-disciplining workers but also dividing the proletariat along identitarian lines in order to discipline and displace resistance to capitalism itself. So, women were constituted as reproductive labourers: not only having children but invisibly (and without pay) reproducing the conditions that enabled men to go to work. The witch hunts, Federici argues, disciplined socially and intellectually powerful heretic women, women who did not imagine themselves as merely wives or invisible cogs in the emerging capitalist machine. Witch hunts were effective because they set the proletariat against one another; violence came from within, not only from above. In a similar way, non-Europeans were racialised as subhuman and demonised as 'dumb brutes' who were only useful as the expendable labour force needed to colonise the new world -- hence the Caliban figure. These were the beginnings of the subjectivation of difference, Federici argues.

A lot of marxist theory subsumes difference and problems of sexism, racism, etc under an all-encompassing theory of class or economy. The programmatic solution posed by such theories always reflects that subsumption: once class is abolished, gender and race politics (and sexuality and the rest) will fall into line. But Federici does not begin from this premise. She begins from a premise that capitalism arrogates difference in order to function and spread, and although that difference is reproduced by capitalism, it is not reducible to a logic of class. Her focus is the body: female bodies, Black bodies, gender non-conforming bodies; bodies that do not conform to the violences of work, structured time, self-controlled sexuality.

I have been finding this book incredibly useful for working on connections between bodies and capitalism. It's also a rollicking good read, lots of exciting illustrations, pirate history of a kind. Read it.

[David Anderson · Rating 5 out of 5]

"Caliban and the Witch" is, without a doubt, the best work of socialist feminist analysis I've read to date. Reviewer Peter Linebaugh gave one the best synopses: "Federici shows that the birth of the proletariat required a war against women, inaugurating a new sexual pact and a new patriarchal era: the patriarchy of the wage. Firmly rooted in the history of the persecution of the witches and the disciplining of the body, her arguments explain why the subjugation of women was as crucial for the formation of the world proletariat as the enclosures of the land, the conquest and colonization of the 'New World,' and the slave trade." Perhaps the most intriguing part of her argument is that instead of seeing the transition to capitalism as being a natural result of defeat of feudalism and an advance in socio-economic development, Federici interprets the rise of capitalism as a reactionary move to subvert the rising tide of communalism and to retain the basic social contract. Capitalism was a strategy devised in reaction to a time of unprecedented workers' power and mass uprisings against the elite (the various peasant wars, the rise of multiple egalitarian heretic sects, etc.). This is a major departure from marxian theory and I'm not sure yet if I can totally embrace it. However, even if that point is disputable, I think her case about crucial role of the subjugation of women in the development of capitalism and her analysis of the historical unfolding of that dynamic is rock solid. Most highly recommended reading for all feminists, all marxists, and all left progressives of any stripe.

[Morgan Blackledge · Rating 5 out of 5]

TEAR DOWN THE HEGEMONIC HEDGEROWS!

This thing is SO groundbreaking and earthshaking that I just COULD NOT put it down.

DAMN!

Silvia Federici ABSOLUTELY SHREDS THE PATRIARCHY in this (one hundred percent gripping and completely ass ripping) Feminist-Marxist historical analysis of the European transition from feudalism to capitalism.

PRIMITIVE ACCUMULATION

Federici begins with a feminist revision of Marx’s concept of "primitive accumulation," defined as the process by which precapitalist feudalism was transformed into a capitalist mode of production.

According to Marx, the purpose of primitive accumulation was to privatize the means of production so that the owner class can profit from the labor of working class presents.

So in other words.

You had to displace people from the land and abolish or co-opt their traditional ways of living (like herbal medicine and foraging), and then make them work for you (on your farm, and then in your factory or some shit), for (not enough) money, while you make a profit (for basically being a dick) via accumulation of surplus (food or material or cash or crypto or whatever).

Federici criticizes Marx for missing (or altogether ignoring) the special ways women were (and still are) exploited under capitalism, and argues that primitive accumulation persists today in the global exploitation of women and BIPOC.

REPRODUCTIVE LABOR

Federici emphasizes the role of women in reproducing the workforce, both by giving birth to new workers and by providing care and domestic labor. She argues that the undervaluation of this "reproductive labor" is foundational to capitalist economies (because “no babies, no workers, no consumers).

ENCLOSURE OF THE COMMONS

Federici also cites the enclosure of communal lands in Europe as one of the preconditions of capitalism. Essentially, the idea is that land (woods, meadows, pastures etc.) that was formerly shared communally, was claimed as private property, and fenced of (by these wicked, thorny hedgerows), which displaced (basically fucked) all the people (and animals) that depended on that land for survival.

Within a generation or two, those same people are starving, and literally BEGGING to be your peasant (slave). Federici argues that this not only turned otherwise free people into dispossessed peasants, but also played a significant role in the degradation of women's status, as they lost access to common resources (like herbs and mushrooms and stuff to make medicine and do abortions and stuff) and as such, became increasingly dependent on men and their wage labor.

Apparently Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump did NOT invent that shit! It’s all been done. In fact, Federici might say it’s a natural feature of the capitalist social order. Sorry about it.

WITCH HUNT

Federici connects the rise of capitalism to the European witch hunts of the 16th and 17th centuries. Federici argues that the persecution of witches, primarily women (probably not many dudes), served to control and suppress the female population and establish a new patriarchal order conducive to capitalism.

Federici asserts that one of the functions of witch hunts was to squash the women lead rebellions against enclosure of the commons, wherein angry mobs of peasants would organize and attempt to sabotage or outright destroy the (aforementioned) hedgerows that enclosed the commons and (in essence) fucked everyone, and benefited no one except for the LAND LORDS.

NOTE: this reminds me of an article I read that described how female and low ranking male baboons in a troop will band together and depose an abusive despotic alpha male (if and when it FINALLY gets bad enough).

Federici also asserts that many of those accused of witchcraft were (of course) midwives offering abortions and birth control to women, at a time when the church (and state) were desperately trying to make more babies to replenish the labor force after the Black Death killed 1/4 of Europe, and subsequently empowered workers and craftspeople to demand better wages due to the labor shortage.

Hmmmm 🤔

COLONIALISM AND SLAVERY

Federici contends that colonialism and the slave trade were integral to the development of European capitalism, and compares it to contemporary global scale primitive accumulation, and how it intersects with gender and racial oppression.

And if you think that isn’t a thing.

I would challenge you to consider who made the device you’re reading this on. Let’s put it this way. It was (almost certainly) made by salve (or severely under-waged) labor, probably in Asia. And it was definitely not made by union labor In Detroit, or Wisconsin, and it probably won’t ever.

Why?

Because late (neoliberal, global) capitalism.

Anyway.

Silvia Federici JAMS!

Caliban and the Witch is a CLASSIC.

So DOPE!

5/5 🤩🌈⭐️💕📚🏳️‍⚧️🙌🔐

[Gabrielle · Rating 5 out of 5]

First off, this book is incredible, and probably not only the most significant Marxist feminist work I've read in a while, but the most significant feminist work I've read in ages. As Marx noted, capital "comes into the world dripping from head to toe, from every pore, with blood and dirt." Silvia Federici's contribution is not only detailing how much blood the birth of capitalism involved, and the continued blood-letting (new rounds of primitive accumulation, as we're seeing in Africa, for instance), but the hows and whys of the process.

Her primary concern is with the bloody repression, immiseration, and mass killings necessary to bring about capitalism in Europe, and how that tied into the bloody colonization of the Americas and Africa. It's long been accepted that the development of racism and colonialism was part of the birth of capitalism; Federici ties this in with the change of character and incredible intensification of patriarchy necessary to bring about capitalism in Europe, through the enclosure of the commons, the dispossession of peasants of their land so that they could serve as wage labor, and the breaking of women into workers whose purpose was to produce more labor. Her method of viewing racism and patriarchy as stratifications built into the working class, and more importantly, this having been an essential and major component of the process of primitive accumulation will hopefully lead to better anti-racist and anti-patriarchal praxis within anti-capitalist movements.

Finally, she ties the gendered nature of the witch hunts in both Europe and the Americas with the central, leading role that women have always played in resistance to capitalism. The women most targeted were old and/or poor, and the ways in which they were targeted plays into their central, organizing, and leading role in resistance to the rising bourgeoisie and the developing modern state. Seen through this lens, it is obvious that the process of colonization (and the capital it generated for developing European states and the rising bourgeois) was not only a brutal process of repression and genocide against the colonized, but also supplied the capital necessary to carry out the process of the proletarianization of the European peasantry. Thus, from its very beginning, racism has always been counter to the interests of all workers.

Perhaps her most controversial idea is that, given the level of struggle of the peasantry in Europe in the late feudal era, that capitalism itself can be seen as a bourgeois counter-revolution against a powerful peasant class that had survived the plague and was ready to tear down the feudal state and class relations. While only the most vulgar of Marxists would argue for a literal stagist model of history, capitalism is commonly seen as a necessary mode of production to develop the means of production such that they can support communism; her arguments around the quality of life of the peasantry in the late 14th century (a quality of life that would not be regained by working people in Western Europe until well into the 19th century) and the communitarian nature of late Medieval peasant life, as well as her extensive documentation of late Medieval peasant revolutionary movements (whose views and slogans sound just as communist today!) provides ample support for this view.

This book is well worth a read for all anti-capitalists and feminists; it succeeds at being a solid, well-researched, Marxist feminist account without requiring one to be a student of Marxism to understand it. However, for those who read it who aren't already Marxists, I see their future reading lists quite possibly including the works of Marx and Engels, autonomists, other left communists, and Marxist feminists.

[Jonathan Hinckley · Rating 5 out of 5]

This really is some of the best historiography I've read.
'Caliban and the Witch' places the institutionalised persecution of the 'Witch' as a key component of a broader process of primitive accumulation (colonisation of the Americas, destruction of enclosures and introduction of scientific rationalism), the expropriation of labour and capital which paved the way for International Capitalism. Central to the thesis is the criticism of Marx's historical materialism, which she challenges in that it frames the development of Capitalism as a necessary step in the historical process, and consequently a means of liberation (at least in comparison to Feudalism). Rather, Federici sees Capitalism as the victory of the counterrevolutionaries, a begrudging alliance between the old and new ruling classes to stamp out the initial waves of proletarian resistance, community and organisation: to this end she outlines a number of radically transgressive social movements such as the Cathars, Diggers and Waldensians and mass action often organised overwhelmingly by women (also she challenges the political dormancy of the Feudal era, calling it "perpetual class war").
The text successfully, and fascinatingly, problematises the ''Enlightenment'' periods, and though it centralises the witchhunts (which she rightly identifies as massively marginalised from the modern historical record) in their colonisation of the female body in the service of procreation, Federici shines light on the wider ideological implications of early capitalism in Europe in the new world in its reassessment of the body, magic and community. I cant overstate how valuable this book is and i think its essential in humanising huge swathes of history often reduced by theory to historical mechanisms.