Disclosure: I financially contributed to this novel’s Kickstarter campaign, which included an original copy of the book upon its release. Review contains spoilers.
There are many promising aspects of this debut novel, but clashing themes, third-act pacing, world-building issues, and confusing actions of the characters weigh it down. The author creates a compelling physical world and a hook. I read this debut novel quickly, a credit to the author’s pacing, moving from one set piece to another with efficiency. The physical world-building is beautiful and thoughtfully crafted. We see many different cities and lands, each with its distinct fashion, dialect, and architecture. Rarely did I ever confuse the houses and lands, thanks to the author’s careful repetition of physical motifs, symbols, and color palettes. Although Italian words and phrases are liberally used, sometimes untranslated, I never felt confused as a non-Italian speaker. The author uses Italian in such a specific context, one can understand the meaning without knowing the literal definition.
Although the book synopsis hints at themes of a crisis of faith and fighting for one’s values, after reading the novel, I came away with a completely different message that seems to be due to a clash between authorial intent and outcome. I believe this story functions best as a villain origin story or of a deeply tragic hero. The protagonist, Clemenza, is an unreliable narrator, a dispossessed noble desperate to return to an earlier time in history when her family had power, money, and status. The Value system itself is incredibly vague. We are supposed to take at face value that certain families were deemed as better than others at upholding Values (literally justice, faith, and hope, etc.) and therefore deserve the special inherited privileges by divine intervention. This is a great setup for a reversal in the novel (the system was corrupt the entire time) or a more nuanced understanding of the Value system and its flaws, as Clemenza’s journey forces her to realize that the world is more complicated (coming-of-age). Unfortunately, neither happens. Despite multiple characters questioning the existence of the Value system and providing compelling evidence arguing against it - the basis of Clemenza’s worldview and upon which the existence of the nobles depended - Clemenza never realizes how flawed and unequal her society is, even for nobles, if she had lived out the promise of her privilege. For example: There is gender-based violence and gender discrimination; pressure for nobles to marry; social stratification existed during the height of the Value system that was offset by an indeterminable amount by nobility-funded charity balls; at least in one of the fantastical realms, non-nobles are barred from entering a palace; and that the general population can apply to become nobles but seem to mostly be rejected for unclear reasons. Unfortunately, because her main cohort consists of other dispossessed nobles, Clemenza doesn’t receive another perspective of what life was really like for regular people before the Raids. So, in the end, Clemenza’s crisis of faith is really just her doubling down on her already-held beliefs, neither growing nor changing.
The third act is where character consistency and pacing issues throughout the novel become worse, with characters having spontaneous personal revelations and overcoming plot hurdles with minor difficulty. Character revelations are introduced far too late in the third act, which should have been foreshadowed in the first two-thirds of the novel. Characters often share very vulnerable personal details despite being on a secret mission with companions they’ve just met. Previously quarreling characters almost unanimously agree to outlandish plans in the final act that pan out because the book must eventually end. There were many fascinating lines and character details I thought would be foreshadowing for the final act of the novel, but were dropped or remained unaddressed. The strongest characters in the novel were the supporting characters like Benigna and Caterina, who have the most interesting plots and character growth. Benigna, for instance, has a complete character arc, going from enemy to friend, despite Clemenza's mistrusting her long after Benigna has proven her loyalty.
The romance between Gianpaolo and Clemenza feels forced and inauthentic because they seem to have misaligned values and personalities for most of the book. In the third act, they call each other out for things they hadn’t even shared out loud with each other earlier in the novel before, either projecting their insecurities onto each other or because the plot needs them to. They enable each other in the worst way; forgiving the parts of each other that should be scrutinized and moralizing the parts that could be given more grace by the other.
By the end of the novel, I found myself agreeing with the main antagonist, Ludovico Guerra, who correctly identifies the problems of society but attempts to fix them in the wrong way. Ultimately, I didn’t feel that the Value system was shown to be worth upholding, yet Clemenza clings to the goal of regaining noble status, as if her trauma has created blinders to a nostalgic past that may not have ever existed. To that effect, she is someone who either willfully or cannot help but mistake cause for effect. She is often cruel and vindictive to others for no reason, starting fights and making decisions without thinking about how it will endanger others. The purpose of the novel’s plot is to make the reader understand Clemenza’s struggle and support her goals. However, due to the novel’s inconsistent execution, I believe the novel is best enjoyed as a character study of a flawed character who refuses to interrogate her own reality. The novel’s premise leads us to believe that the main conflict will be Clemenza struggling against sacrificing her Values for her goal, but what were her Values exactly, and if her goal was returning to a time where her inherited wealth gave her power and privilege, was it ever truly worth fighting for?