✧₊‧˚⁀➷ 2.67/5 .ᐟ
genuinely so sad about not liking this. i like the concept, but the execution was very flat. the characters are one dimensional and utterly aggravating to read about.
let's start with little flower. she's the enslaved character getting fucked over by her entitled mistress left and right. at one point, she's permanently miamed the family that owns her, resulting in her being unable to practice her art, the only means of self-expression she's allowed as a slave. i understand that based on the time period and her position, she has very few options for recourse, and that's obviously not her fault. but she's gandhi-like in her inner monologue as well, to the point of derangement. the personification of toxic positivity. she "resents" her employers somewhat, but she's unable to hate them because as women, they're victims of misogyny too. never does she even in her thoughts wish anything against them. which is like?? yes, that's such an admirable mindset, truly love your maturity, but this is the late 1800s, andrea dworkin. do you genuinely expect me to believe that this is the realistic mindset of a woman in the 1800s, when it's not even the mindset of most women today? and forget accuracy, actually, i don't even care, it's just that reading about miss mother theresa is an irritating, eye-bleeding experience. this other enslaved girl, friend of little flower's, once gets her literal eye cut out, and understandably, the friend becomes a little hateful towards the employers after that. little flower is sooo condescending towards the friend, like "i don't want to be hateful like you, i want to be happy, hope you become cheerful" or something equally weird, and oh my god, i wanted to climb into the book and help linjing kill her myself.
moving onto linjing. she is little flower's owner. okay, i know there's probably plenty of rich people that act like her in real life, and there were probably more of them in the 1800s. but again, reading about one-dimensional characters that are as insufferable, entitled, and stupid at age 20 as they are at age five is not an interesting experience. she's obviously written to be unlikable, i know that's the point of her character, but there are ways to make unlikable characters interesting, and she's just very much not. she's supposed to show how even wealthy women have no autonomy in a world that caters to the whims of men, but it's very surface level, and the theme is undercut by little flower's constant gandhi tendencies. linjing does have a redemption arc, but it occurs so late in the book that it's disneyish. it's just little flower telling her "hey, you're kind of an entitled freak, and we were never friends because i was literally your slave" and linjing is like "omg? you're so real. i'll be nice from now on." like okay...? it's ridiculous how fast linjing becomes a normal human. cured by one two-page speech. are we serious?
linjing and little flower's relationship itself is paced very oddly. linjing spends years psychologically torturing little flower (part 1 and 2) and then there's a two year timeskip for part 3, in which they're magically friends. there's a little flashback, showing how linjing vows to be kind employer, but a single one-page flashback isn't really good development, is it? of course, after that, you see that linjing is still insufferable. she's now just a better actress, but i still would have liked to see what happened in those two years.
thank you to netgalley for the advanced copy.