Not a book it's easy to review given the personal lens through which the subject is seen. A book like 'Intervals' reminds us that GoodReads, with its star-ratings and idiosyncratic reviewer-by-reviewer value systems, is not for all good reads. However.
When Brooker was still in her late teens, her mother - only in her late thirties herself - was diagnosed with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. As the austerity state further attacked an already underfunded social care system, she felt her life contained more pain than it was worth, and decided, after a decade, to starve herself to death.
It would be patronising here to praise Brooker's clarity and restraint in how she writes about her mum's decision, what led to it, and the personal consequences of that experience for Brooker herself; I personally think Brooker is entitled to a huge amount of rage, and it's a typically English critique to praise someone - or a book in this case - for behaving well in difficult conditions. Still, that's what Brooker does, writing with uncrowded intimacy and incredible emotional and philosophical maturity about the weeks it took her mother to die, and the context (personal, social, political and historical) in which this happened. You come to really feel that you know Brooker and her mum, who she writes with such care and complexity, as if she's laying down a series of images and photographs that allow you to see her many sides, so her contradictions make her real rather than confusing. (In this, it reminded me of Hisham Matar's 'The Return', which has a similarly 'exploded' view of the writer's father and a non-chronological portrait of their father-son relationship.)
Amongst this, however, there's the occasional feeling that Brooker has almost taken on too much. 'Intervals' is at times autotheory, at times straightforward memoir, and at times flatly journalistic polemic on the underfunding of state healthcare for those experiencing chronic pain and/or disablement. But rather than blending these into one voice, 'Intervals' sort of shifts gears into and out of them, switching tone and register mid-paragraph, and while there's a lot here that's illuminating and moving, there's also an unevenness to the prose. The journalistic material especially - the facts and figures of the unregulated funerals market, statistics about medication costs in America and the UK, quotes about the consequences of the right to die being brought into British state law - sometimes tripped me up as a reader. (Brooker reveals eventually that she spoke to a Westminster MP as part of a campaign group, and I wondered if she'd incorporated that material here without letting it settle more naturally into the book.) In one early scene we see Brooker making a T-shirt for her mum with her Sisters Uncut group as part of an anti-austerity demo, blending details of MS with personal reminiscence and the consequence of neoliberal state underfunding, and I wanted more moments like this, where her three strands came together more organically and the information felt truly 'lived'. At the midway point, for example, we're told of a "kind, camp Irishman" who visits her mum as a care specialist, but he disappears right after he's introduced, replaced by summaries of a UNISON report and pay disparity in hospice charities. The two elements feel oddly separate on the page, and the man becomes a sort of prologue to the material, rather than the figure whose existence inevitably gives rise to this issue in Brooker's mother's life.
My other issue isn't really Brooker's fault: she has a sister, who we're eventually told asked to be removed from the narrative. But until that confirmation, it gives the narrative a haunted, unnerving edge. Brooker remembers being six and her mum going into labour, and the scary experience of the birth not going according to plan; elsewhere, we're told of her mum's remarriage, though this second husband never appears again. The evasiveness around this left me wondering if the baby had died at birth, or if the sister had left with the father, and why we weren't hearing more about that; and where was she during those last weeks? I was glad of the explanation near the book's conclusion - though exactly what happened with the second husband, unless I missed a reference, remains absent.
Overall the strengths of 'Intervals' win out, and for me its most powerful section was Brooker's wholly personal writing on the last days of her mum's life, where statistics and theory disappeared. This isn't to say Brooker isn't good at the theory: her reading is steeped in it, with quotations from Maggie Nelson, Anne Boyer, Nuar Alsadir, Saidiya Hartman, Kate Briggs, Sara Ahmed and more, and I did admire how she selected lines and phrases, keeping the narrative moving with a strong sense of purpose and momentum. 'Intervals' is already longlisted for the Women's Prize for Non-Fiction, and though there's plenty on that longlist I haven't read, I fully expect this to win a place on the shortlist.