I'm trying to decide whether this book was good-ish, but with major flaws, or crappy with some redeeming moments.
Pro: I like the premise a lot, which is of course why I picked it up, and the vocabulary is much more developed than you often find in children's books - something I appreciate, because one of my particular pet peeves is how adults always underestimate children and freak out about the possibility of them reading something that's "too hard" for them.
Con: So the vocabulary is good, but the style, both narrative and dialogue, was often very awkward and unsophisticated. I skimmed most of the middle because it just didn't feel necessary, and was annoying to read. There were honestly sentences that sounded straight out of the stories I used to write in middle school, and I will tell you now that those things were utter garbage. So that's a pretty big flaw.
Con: The whole thing was disorientingly medieval-feeling, with the fonts and the tapestries and everything, but the book actually takes place mostly in the second half of the 1800s. I realize that this is because William Morris, the subject of the story, was really into the Middle Ages, but it just made things feel slightly off.
Pro: Toward the end, there were some surprisingly deep discussions on socialism and capitalism, personal growth, and the meaning and accessibility of art. The protagonists are 13 and 9 years old, so the audience for this book is young, and I love that this author chose to introduce such grownup topics to them.
Okay, so while I was reading the book, I intended to come here and say it was terrible. But the more I talk about it, the more I think it might actually be okay, especially for its target audience. Still only going to give it two stars, but I don't think I'd knock it out of someone's hand if I saw them with it.