This is a nice book for anyone who is hesitant to read either Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (ZAMM) or Lila. This collection contains excerpts from both works and is Pirsig’s philosophy on tap. After initially flipping through the book and seeing photos of Pirsig’s shop tools, I hoped the book would include anecdotes about craft and/or workmanship. Instead, the book gets at the heart of Pirsig’s philosophy of Quality without focusing on specifics of how Quality may manifest itself in objects, an example of what Pirsig calls “static Quality.”
Pirsig’s writing is very down to earth. I admired his explanation for writing ZAMM and Lila as first-person fiction in order to avoid his philosophy sounding “like somebody’s talking from a pulpit, pontificating.” (p.15) Pirsig refuses to define dynamic Quality, instead allowing it to be an open, flexible concept that can aid people as they grow. (p.97)
One highlight of this book (which is actually just a long excerpt from ZAMM) is Pirsig’s realization that he can avoid the overarching dualistic conundrums of philosophy (Subject vs Object, Mind vs Body) by introducing dynamic Quality as a third player. Quality is described as the event in which object and subject brush up against one another. He then takes this idea one step further:
“The very existence of subject and object themselves is deduced from the Quality event. The Quality event is the cause of the subjects and objects, which are then mistakenly presumed to be the cause of the Quality!” (p.54)
While this thought process is provocative, its byproducts shape how I will think of Quality more so than many other statements in Pirsig’s writing. A byproduct I’m referring to is, according to Pirsig’s worldview, Quality is the cosmic building block for everything (or for the Buddhists, nothingness), even from an empirical angle. Pirsig doubles down:
“Why… should a group of simple, stable compounds of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen struggle for billions of years to organize themselves into a professor of chemistry? Natural selection is Dynamic Quality at work…” and “The universe is evolving from a condition of low quality (quantum forces only, no atoms, pre-big bang) toward a higher one (birds, trees, societies, and thoughts), and in a static sense these two are not the same.”
This is flirting with Leibniz’s worldview of ours being “the best of all possible worlds” parodied by Voltaire in Candide. Pirsig continually uses the example of someone sitting on a hot stove and realizing they are in a low-quality situation before they need intellectualize (attribute words and symbols) what has happened. I believe a key concept missing from Pirsig’s metaphysics of quality is a discussion of equality. Equality, when compared to equity, can yield less than ideal situations. I believe that the person who sits on the stove will experience a low-quality situation that yields the heat’s proliferation/actualization on a chemical level. In short, for someone to experience a high-quality situation, they must do so at the expense of something/someone else who will suffer a low quality result. I’m sure that Pirsig would disagree (and I’m also sure this flies in the face of Buddhism / Hinduism), but his use of materialist arguments don’t do him any favors as far as I’m concerned. Outside of these materialist arguments, I do enjoy his worldview. Again, his down-to-earth writing style does help.
A passage I found amusing was Pirsig’s retelling of how complex it is to describe what constitutes quality to his English students. “The solution lies in a common word that on first analysis seems as simple as the word ‘time’ and that, on further inspection, turns out to be fully as complex as that word ‘time.’” (p.26) I find this funny because before reading this book I asked myself “What is required in order for something to be of quality?” With much conviction, I answered “Things of quality take time.” I now see that both are loaded words and I’m very skeptical of my answer.
Many times while reading this book I was reminded of the title of Lawrence Weschler and Robert Irwin’s “Seeing is Forgetting the Name of the Thing One Sees.” I would recommend that book to anyone who enjoys Pirsig’s worldview.
A life lesson:
“I want to emphasize that when that idea came [the idea for the book ZAMM], there was no preparation for it. It arrived out of my own circumstances, rather than out of a deliberate desire on my part to sit down and write. I wasn’t being separate from what I was doing; this was arising out of what I was doing.” (p.8) –
“Again, I’ll repeat: not a deliberate thing where I’m coming at it from a distance saying, ‘Now I’m going to do this thing that was in front of me,’ but a kind of opening up from inside, and finding that this thing that I’ve started to do is bigger than I ever thought it was, and I’m going to let it grow…” (p.12)
And a favorite quote:
“The place to improve the world is first in one’s own heart and head and hands, and then work outward from there.” (p.58)