Much has been written speculating about the identity of the young man, apparently the poet's patron, to whom so many of Shakespeare's sonnets are addressed; and, perhaps, there has been an equal amount of speculation about the identity of the "dark lady" of the sonnets. Rudenstine doesn't waste his time with identity speculation. They are there, addressed but unnamed, in the poems. Whether such persons existed in reality or as convenient persona in the poet's mind, Ruenstine's interest is to show how the sequence of the sonnets present a kind of story that reveal a wrestling with the nature of love, friendship, jealousy, vulnerability, beauty, talent, and the passing of time. In short, the order of the sonnets is not random, according to Rudenstine. Who assigned the order? Rudenstine does not say. But in presenting the sonnets as an ordered sequence, Rudenstine suggests a new way to read and understand the 154 sonnets.
The first large grouping, Sonnets 1-126 are addressed to the young man. The poet reveals him to be younger and richer and better looking and of higher station than the poet and these qualities lead to the vulnerability and sometimes base humiliation of the poet. Will he remain the young man's favored poet? his close friend or be cast aside? ("When in disgrace with Fortune and men's eyes/I all alone beweep my outcast state") Can he, the poet, outsmart time and preserve the young man's beauty and youth through his poetry? Rudenstine takes us through the sonnets to show how they reveal the poet's supreme confidence in his verse ("So long as men can breathe or eyes can see/So long lives this, and this gives life to thee."), to his doubt of his own talent, to his jealousy because of the inconstancy of his friend, to absences and reconciliations ("How like a winter hath my absence been"). The emotions are sometimes tranquil, sometimes accusatory, sometimes resigned, and often tumultuous. Rudenstine finds that in their order there is meaning, a drama if you will.
The subject of sonnets 127 - 154 is the poet's mistress, often referred to as the "dark lady" because of the way she is described in the poems. The poet is in her thrall. She is a bad influence on the poet; she is unfaithful to the poet. He knows this, yet he cannot give her up ("The expense of spirit in a waste of shame/Is lust in action,.../All this the world well knows yet none knows well/To shun the heaven that leads men to this hell.") If the poems addressed to the young man were more anguished because the love was greater, the poems to the mistress, which are more about lust than love, may be wittier and seem to bring more self-knowledge ("When my love swears that she is made of truth,/I do believe her though I know she lies/...Therefore I lie with her, and she with me,/And in our faults by lies we flattered be.")
The vicissitudes of love and beauty and talent and time rise and fall in the sequence. And a reader can still enjoy individual, favorite sonnets on their own.