What do you think?
Rate this book
Cybernetics for the 21st Century Vol. 1: Epistemological Reconstruction
- GenresPhilosophy
274 pages, Paperback
Published February 1, 2024
4 people are currently reading
125 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
October 27, 2024
The book provides an overview of Cybernetics, a field essentially lost to time whose principles have been absorbed by more prominent fields today. Its objective is to resuscitate the principles that Cybernetics brought into forbearance in a manner most applicable to imminent issues like geopolitics, data concentration, and its relationship with power, as well as AI.
Cybernetics (as defined by Norbert Wiener) is the study of communication and control in animals, machines, and systems more broadly. It seeks to take a more biological and humanistic approach in its focus on systems. It readily embraces uncertainty and encourages trial and error (performance) rather than knowledge acquisition when approaching systems. With Cybernetics one gets along with systems updating belief in a Bayesian-like manner rather than actively trying to get to the crux of what a system is.
At the core of this is the belief that the world is fundamentally unknowable. Cybernetics realizes that complex systems are subject to the interpretation of the observer and that they are very rarely ever static or readily interpretable.
I find this thinking fascinating as it clashes (or at least I think it does) with my belief about how progress(especially scientific progress) in our world today has been achieved. My current belief is that it is more likely that a desire to reduce uncertainty is what leads us to make sense of the world and as a result scientific progress. And that the world is fundamentally comprehensible.
That said, thinking more granularly about unknowability and trial and error, we find that a lot of reasoning does generally include a significant component of trial and error. The degree to which it is universal in the best of thinking is unbeknownst to me. The scientific method and its use of hypothesis testing fundamentally integrate unknowability. So maybe, Cybernetics does have a point? Maybe the point here is that we should try as much as possible to leave our interpretations of phenomena out of the equation and simply experience the systems we participate in.
Regardless I believe this book presents the history, participants, and philosophical movement in a manner that's relevant for today's context and for that, it has my appreciation.
Cybernetics (as defined by Norbert Wiener) is the study of communication and control in animals, machines, and systems more broadly. It seeks to take a more biological and humanistic approach in its focus on systems. It readily embraces uncertainty and encourages trial and error (performance) rather than knowledge acquisition when approaching systems. With Cybernetics one gets along with systems updating belief in a Bayesian-like manner rather than actively trying to get to the crux of what a system is.
At the core of this is the belief that the world is fundamentally unknowable. Cybernetics realizes that complex systems are subject to the interpretation of the observer and that they are very rarely ever static or readily interpretable.
I find this thinking fascinating as it clashes (or at least I think it does) with my belief about how progress(especially scientific progress) in our world today has been achieved. My current belief is that it is more likely that a desire to reduce uncertainty is what leads us to make sense of the world and as a result scientific progress. And that the world is fundamentally comprehensible.
That said, thinking more granularly about unknowability and trial and error, we find that a lot of reasoning does generally include a significant component of trial and error. The degree to which it is universal in the best of thinking is unbeknownst to me. The scientific method and its use of hypothesis testing fundamentally integrate unknowability. So maybe, Cybernetics does have a point? Maybe the point here is that we should try as much as possible to leave our interpretations of phenomena out of the equation and simply experience the systems we participate in.
Regardless I believe this book presents the history, participants, and philosophical movement in a manner that's relevant for today's context and for that, it has my appreciation.
Displaying 1 of 1 review