I really didn't care for this. I'm aware of the author's name and thought I'd give her a try with her latest on the library's Sizzler rack. It was just not intelligent. Very, very shallow. I'm not a fan of the James Patterson School of the Pop Novel with 2-page chapters and soap-opera cliffhanger sentences ending each chapter. Blech.
I don't even understand this "series" -- this girl is a wedding cake decorator when she's not shooting commercials and bit parts as an aspiring actress and wherever she goes, people get murdered around her, but she's not trying to solve the murders, and then she almost gets killed by the murderer at the end. Repeat. So, the book has this weird inconsistent tone where one minute, we're reading in great detail about the decorations on a cake, then the grisly details of violent murder. Our "heroine" is a screamer, a fainter, one of the dumber characters I've encountered. A book tries to steer a course between reality and fictional story, and the world in this book is not plausible. And the things that happen are not plausible. And the tone veers in a nonsensical way, between poetic license then attempts to suddenly be more realistic.
And she is not trying to solve all these murders around her, so there is no discussion of actual evidence or situational clues, just more cakes to be decorated! And a recipe in the back of the book. I'll bet all the books in the series have recipes in the back.
And (spoiler alert), what we don't get is any details about the murderer. That just came out of left field. Hard to imagine a woman pulling off a murder of a man that involves strangulation and bull-whipping. Who were the 3 guys that came into the bakery to talk to Bertrand? Why was Aaron at the wedding? He had no ties to the bride and groom, or did I miss that. He just shows up and presents them a gift he's been working on for months. And, Jack, the boyfriend in Manhattan...don't know anything about him except he wears a tie, drinks Scotch, and is a cool, FBI-guy stereotype. Actually, all the characters are stereotypes. Piper is kind of a silly name for a cake decorator...I'll bet the author works hard to not write sentences like "Piper piped icing through the piping bag, pushing out long pipelines of icing criss-crossing the cookie," and "Piper piped in with her thoughts on the murderer!"
Sloppy, lazy, no craft. And obviously, people love it, evidenced by all the 4-5 star ratings on here. They. Love. IT.
UPDATE: I read that this lady has an autistic son, and now I feel terrible about what I've written. She's obviously very successful, been in the game a long time, the "series" mentality in publishing right now is not her fault, it's about money and making a living, and who can begrudge anyone that. Come on, publishers, hire me, and let's just run everything first through the Logic Processor. Even though the book is not my cup of tea, I could have made suggestions for making it less flat and shallow.