I have not read a lot of books on the early church fathers. It is an overlooked (not opposed, just underemphasized) aspect of my tradition, Evangelicalism. I am not sure why, because there is so much to learn from those who went before. Why are we not reading (and reading about) Augustine, Athanasius and Cyril, for example, and the things that they opposed or stood for? We should! And I will delight in, and make a point of doing more so, in the future.
I have just found this series a on some of the patristics. And this, the first in the series that I have read, will not be the last. It's well written, a fascinating subject and I learned a lot. Presenting the dangers of Nestorianism was well done by Hames. But it's not just what Cyril was standing against. Even more importantly, the well-developed and theologically sound Christology of Cyril's, is so rich. We all need to read content like this. The depth of thinking and intense commitment to truth of this 5th century writer is profound.
Before I mention a quote from the book, I want to say that Daniel Hames is an excellent writer. The depth of insight, thoroughness of his explanations and the amazing ability to convey difficult concepts clearly, especially to someone like me, not a theologian by training, was all very impressive.
My one quote from this book, a few words of Cyril's himself. In one sentence from his commentary on 1 Pet 4:1, he states a solid 'two natures in one person' Christology.
"He who endured the noble for our sake and tasted of death was no ordinary man conceived of as separate and distinct of the Word of God the Father but it was the Lord of Glory himself who suffered in the flesh, according to the Scriptures."