DISCLAIMER: All thoughts are my own and nobody is forcing me to say anything. Everything stated below is my own opinion and I just don't want to add "I think", or "I believe" in each and every sentence to emphasize that this review is not trying to be a source of information like the news or anything. These are all coming from my views and thoughts and opinions and beliefs. Details about the books I have stated below are from my own observations. I've read all of the books I have mentioned and the information I have disclosed about them came from the books which are the source material themselves. Please feel free to do your own responsible reading and investigation before deciding if you are going to be agreeing or disagreeing with me. Thank you!
Another author that gives the ick. Yikes.
Chloe C. Peñaranda will always be known to me as that one author who copies other author's works/content/original ideas, tries to rewrite them believing she was making them "better", when it was all just a result of lack of talent and creativity. There is AO3 and fanfiction.net for your fan fictions.
IMHO Chloe is not merely taking inspirations and writing her own unique stories.
She is rewriting other people's stories. She takes their ideas, their characters, their plot, everything, and produce a clunky book from all that "borrowed" material she then proudly calls her own.
Chloe derives so much from SJM that she doesn't have her own brand of writing, and all that was done is make a bland, boring diluted copy of the original.
This is my own personal honest thoughts, views, and opinions. I am not one of the SJM fanatics but since she is the one being copied the most by Chloe and this book has the most copied material, I have cited her and her works the most. Also, Chloe always gets so pissy whenever she's compared to SJM even in good faith, and I could only assume it was because she was guilty and wants to do everything in her power to distance herself from SJM. She was also perhaps jealous that SJM could come up with such amazing ideas that she needed to copy in order for her to be able to write something LOL
If imitation is the best form of flattery, Chloe C. Peñaranda must have been obsessed with Sarah J. Mass.
Now onto the main event...
BOOK REVIEW
An Heir Comes to Rise... Or AHCTR. Seriously? As in ACOTAR? SMH. But wait. There's more.
Remember Feyre Archeron (A Court of Thorns and Roses) and Aelin Ashryver Galathynius (Throne of Glass)? Well, now let me introduce you to this book's heroine, a mash up of these two original characters by Sarah J. Maas, Chloe C. Peñaranda's once favorite author until people realized she ripped off a lot of her books and characters and not just this once...
Faythe Ashfyre! 😬
See the play on names? Faythe as in Feyre? Ashfyre as in Ashryver? LMFAO I swear I'm not making this up. But of course all allegations were denied that Faythe was named after Feyre and there was even an attempt to salvage this by trying to make her name have an in-world meaning behind it (cringe and pathetic IMHO it's a yikes moment, really).
Sure. Whatever makes you fall asleep at night XD But we all know the truth. FFS even the Ashryver of Aelin's name. Ashfyre. Really? SMH.
That's not all, folks.
We also have a bastardized combination of Chaol Westfall and Dorian Havilliard, the captain of the guard and the prince heir to the throne from Throne of Glass... Nikalias Silvergriff! But this time he's both the captain of the guard and the prince! Two in one! Because it'd be too obvious to have two false love interests like in Throne of Glass, so now we only have one! And yes, there's also a false love interest before we meet the real love interest...
And this time, you guessed it, he's a mashed up version of Rowan Whitethorn and Rhysand: Reylan Arrowood! A silver-haired fae general from another kingdom who was not in good terms with Faythe at first, like Rowan and Rhys were to Aelin and Feyre. He's even got Rowan's tortured tattoos LMFAO the tattoos Rowan got because of his tortured past, is what I meant XD
Rowan, I mean Reylan, also lost his wife and had a heart to heart talk with Faythe about the loss of a loved one in a similar scene lifted off of Throne of Glass when Celaena was playing the piano in her room and Dorian came inside, and Celaena opened up about Sam Cortland. This time, to "spice" things up a little bit, Reylan was the one playing the piano. Ha! Now how can that be considered inappropriate? (Chloe C. Peñaranda, probably, while writing this Throne of Glass/ACOTAR ripped off series).
Tell me now, dear readers, are these similarities just "common fantasy tropes"? Could every fantasy, or could a lot of them, have this skeletal backbone that each of these characters have? Okay, okay. I feel like I need to add more. Let us go on to more history and relationships, shall we?
In this book, we also have an in-universe version of Sam, but he does not die LOL in the form of Jakon Kilnight. I am not even kidding when I say that this guy is so Sam coded from his looks to his forever pining for Faythe. They're also best friends like Celaena and Sam in Throne of Glass. Well, Celaena did not actually call Sam her best friend outright but it was understood since she had no any other close friends except him.
The character Tauria Stagknight from this book series is Nehemia Ytger from Throne of Glass, and her kingdom's insignia is a stag like Terrasen in Throne of Glass. They both have darker skin tone and wield a staff. Tauria is also Yrene Towers in a way that she gets her own book a la Tower of Dawn style with Nikalias Silvergriff. And to also make a tandem read with A Throne From the Ashes (book three) and A Clash of Three Courts (book four). Two books that happened at the same chronological time in-world, but focused on different characters... like what SJM did with Empire of Storms and Tower of Dawn.
A Clash of Three Courts was focused on Tauria (Nehemia/Yrene) and Nik (Chaol/Dorian) while A Throne From the Ashes focused on the rest of the other characters. It was EXACTLY LIKE EMPIRE OF STORMS AND TOWER OF DAWN. No one can convince me that the idea didn't come from SJM no matter how many other books out there have this kind of structure (e.g., in George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series). Everything copied adds up to what SJM did and wrote so no matter how much and how hard all allegations of ripping off or being inspired by SJM were denied.
It's all there staring us right between our eyes! You can keep on saying these comparisons are all common fantasy tropes but if you haven't read the VERY SPECIFIC THINGS copied, then I don't know how else can I do to make you see past the victimizing oneself, appearing all docile and sweet in socials when more often than not the true nature is shown.
This book AHCTR also had appearances of this magical stag like the Lord of the North in Throne of Glass. In the third book of this series, A Throne From the Ashes (getting ahead of myself here but since we're discussing borrowed characters, let me mention this as well), there are also character equivalents of Manon Blackbeak (also from Throne of Glass) and Nephele (that seraphim from ACOWAR which I will elaborate more on my review for the third book, just mentioning it here LOL).
Faythe also encounters a "spirit" in this book which is very much derived from Throne of Glass in the form of Elena's character, who guided Celaena and sort of gave her hints and clues all throughout her journey. There are also goddesses in AHCTR akin to Mab, Mora, and Maeve from Throne of Glass so tell me now, dear readers. All these characters and even tropes are some you could find in fantasy, right? One could argue that SJM was not the first one to write about a lost heir, or goddesses, or mind speaking. HOWEVER, with all of this elements being present in Throne of Glass and the way they were written and connected with each other IS ALSO THE SAME WAY THEY WERE COPIED in the book.
You would see fantasy elements of this and that particularly here and there but IN CONTEXT, looking at it this way, it is very much obvious that the book ripped off Throne of Glass and ACOTAR. I believe this is the main reason of the struggle to finish this series now. Because too many people have realized everything that was copied and now, everything planned to copy for the final books had to be scrapped off and it has to be written from scratch, finally having to come up with an original idea of and not "borrow" from others.
The names of places were all Throne of Glass coded, too LMFAO In this book AHCTR, there's a place called High Farrow and Fenstead... Taken from Throne of Glass's Fenharrow. While Throne of Glass has Illium, AHCTR replicates it with Ellium. Balruhn (ToG) became Dalrune (AHCTR). It's cringe LMFAO Even the "To Wendlyn" with an arrow in the ToG map, with "To Valgard" with the same arrow on the same exact unknown direction. I'm crying, this is just too much.
The "nightwalkers" were invented, fae who have the same mind abilities as Rhysand. But they are not totally derived from Rhysand because they can walk through dreams XD I'm laughing so hard now at the attempt at a semblance of originality.
An Heir Comes to Rise is perhaps what was thought would be the "The Assassin's Blade", since it focuses more on the origin of Aelin, I mean Feyre, I mean Faythe, and the real story begins in the second book. Still, AHCTR ends like how Throne of Glass ends with the female main character finding herself working for the king, the man who she despises the most, losing one potential love interest, and starting to live in the palace to actually begin her adventure.
As if all the other elements were not enough and she has to copy SJM character for character, plot for plot, scene for scene, ending for ending.
In this book, Faythe faced the king who instructed her to torture an innocent "mind to mind". Sounds familiar? Sounds like what Amarantha forced Rhys to do Under the Mountain? This was also done in a dramatic fashion like how SJM writes it in her books: with an entire audience and some of the main character's allies unable to do anything and just stand by the sidelines while they face this problem on their own. Similar to how Feyre was beat up by Amarantha at the end of ACOTAR and how Aelin faced Cain at the end of Throne of Glass. Faythe had no choice but to face the king of High Farrow and suffer the consequences of her actions.
The level of copying and replication LMFAO really. And the audacity to deny all of it as if people are blind and dumb, and would not notice T_T XD
I might have been too trigger happy in mentioning Reylan because he does not appear until book two LOL but I want to showcase as many ripped off material as possible and as much as it won't spoil the series LMFAO as I can to prove that the author was just in denial when she keeps on insisting that her books were only similar in the barest, most skeletal, way or form with the other books accused of copying.
Tell yourself that, if that will make your conscience lighter LOL the truth will come out one way or the other.
There are more ripped off scenes and characters/backgrounds in the next books. I'm going to try and see if I remember more from this book and add them here when I do.
This book is NOT EVEN GOOD. If you want to read a better book, then by all means READ THE ORIGINAL, READ THRONE OF GLASS. And that's saying something LOL An Heir Comes to Rise is so BORING. Nothing ever happens and the times when the plot picks up, it was all derived from Throne of Glass which is pathetic since the scenes that should be exciting were copied scenes. Even when the characters seem interesting, it was because their attributes were copied from existing SJM characters.
This is the MOST UNORIGINAL STORY I have ever read. READERS DO NOT BE FOOLED. If you read these books first and become interested in the story, DO YOUR RESEARCH AND READ THRONE OF GLASS FIRST. This book, this series, copied a lot from Throne of Glass and others who have not read Throne of Glass might think the author wrote an original and unique story but NO BECAUSE THIS IS NOT IT.
Also be wary because apparently, this is the modus operandi here. What was done is taking an original story and copy scenes and characters from them, even lines and dialogue, rewrite them in "their own words" because apparently it's the norm now: just authors copying each other and it's fine as long as you're not caught or you've paraphrased hard enough, as implied by the author of this book (who was also so good at throwing accusations at her to other authors and saying, "What about this author who was inspired by this thing and he/she copied from this author?" LOL IF ONLY there were authors who actually do what she does.). And then trash and disparage those same authors they copied from (just look at how they talk about SJM).
The plot drags on forever, the characters don't feel real at all and there was no real sense of danger. There was no gravity to the conflict because it was so lackluster and cringe-y. Character growth who? Plot development who? Faythe was so one dimensional and stale I'd be better off reading a book about a brick. That'd be more interesting.
This book has NO GRAVITAS. Chloe doesn't know how to write a compelling enough of a story that would make me care about anything at all. At least Sarah J. Maas knows how to write scenes with high stakes that apparently a lot of readers feel the weight of, making them care about the book and the characters. This book lacks that same purpose as to why it was written.
It first started with a hungry, impoverished girl who was striving to make ends meet, then she discovered she has hidden powers which she wanted to learn more of, but then she reverted back to wanting to earn money and she didn't even care about her origins at all? There is no big plot that would make the main character's actions matter. The blurb lies that this book was like Red Queen where there's power imbalance because the main character Faythe DOES NOT CARE about that at all. She did not help the weak, she did not use her power to save others or fight for those who cannot fight for themselves. She was only good at making stupid after stupid decision. The book revolves around her being what other characters said she was, which I call BS because she never exhibited those characteristics supporting characters spoke of. What a gratuitous self insert of a character who was made out to be as fierce as Celaena Sardothien and as meek as Feyre Archeron but failing to do so.
The story was bland enough and we have to follow this Mary Sue of a character who was written to make "some mistakes" so she wouldn't be cast off as a Mary Sue but those mistakes didn't hold much gravity to them or they were resolved so quickly the character still comes off as perfect. This is what happens when there was not one original thought or effort made and when the character was written purely based off of others without implementing your own take on it.
There. I said what I said and I might have forgotten other things that completely bugged me but honestly, I went on reading up to the fourth book for the sake of finding out if the author did better but all she did with the story was the same thing she did with this one, and continue doing so in her current books including her contemporary dark romance debut, which was Nothing Left to Lose by Kristen Moseley rewritten (aside from the many similarities again lifted from the original work and passed off as "regular contemporary romance tropes), there was also a scene from Moseley's book lifted off completely that made me DNF Chloe's rip off immediately. This was just too much. She's going after the stories of smaller relatively unknown authors now that more and more people are discovering how she rips off bigger authors.
Anyway...
I would like to end this with:
Dear author, would you please stay away from Goodreads now. Or Chloe's friends, stay away from negative reviews like this. This is not for you guys. Just a friendly reminder because all of Chloe's social media posts and even her untruthful replies on Threads (about how someone commented certain negative things in her publishing news announcements on Instagram when what she mentioned was verbatim what negative reviewers have written on this supposedly safe space for them) suggests she or perhaps one or two or a few of her flock casually lurk in reviewer spaces where they can gather intel about who reviews Chloe's books.
And also, one last thing: I know this review might be buried underneath all others but if you somehow saw this, I want to say, be careful. Not just with this author but other authors who exhibit the same attitude as well. CCP might not be the first or only one who does this but I only happen to have read her books and thus I can only speak of that about them.
REVIEWS ARE FOR READERS AND IN MINE AUTHORS ARE NEVER TAGGED NOR MENTIONED. I DO NOT SEND THEM MY REVIEWS OR EVEN INVITE THEM HERE IN MY SPACE.
READERS ARE SENTIENT HUMAN BEINGS WHO CAN DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES. THEY CAN READ AS MANY REVIEWS AS THEY WANT AND WHILE ONE NEGATIVE REVIEW SUCH AS MINE MAY OR MAY NOT INFLUENCE THEM IN READING THE BOOK, IT IS STILL UP TO THEM AND IT'S THEIR DISCRETION WHETHER THEY AGREE TO SOME POINTS OR NOT.
PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED TO HAVE OPINIONS NO MATTER HOW HEAVY THEY ARE. PEOPLE ARE NOT SO GULLIBLE AS TO JUST BELIEVE SOMEONE'S OPINIONS BLINDLY SO THIS REVIEW SHOULD BE TAKEN WITH A GRAIN OF SALT AND I INVITE EVERYONE WHO HAPPENS TO READ THIS TO DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH AND IF YOU DISAGREE WITH WHAT I HAVE SAID, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO DO SO OR CORRECT ME IF I ERR ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE DISCUSSIONS AS WELL.
I SAY THIS BECAUSE NEGATIVE REVIEWS ARE OFTEN INVALIDATED JUST BECAUSE THE AUTHOR DOES NOT AGREE WITH THEM OR THEIR FRIENDS FEEL OFFENDED ON THEIE BEHALF (WHEN SAID FRIENDS ALSO REVIEW OTHER BOOKS NEGATIVELY). IT ONLY APPEARS TO BE THAT EITHER THE AUTHOR OR HER FLOCK DOES NOT WANT THESE THINGS DISCUSSED BECAUSE THEY WANT THEM KEPT HIDDEN FOR SOME HEAVY REASON THAT FORCES THEM TO EVEN REPORT AND HAVE COMMENTS AND ACCOUNTS DELETED.
READING A NEGATIVE REVIEW SHOULD NOT CONCERN THE AUTHORS BECAUSE THEY SHOULD NEVER EVEN READ REVIEWS THAT ARE NOT GIVEN TO THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE. I AM RESPECTING THEM AND THEIR PRIVACY SO I ONLY ASK THEY DO THE SAME TO ME.
Edit: spelling
Edit: grammar