In Abductive Analysis , Iddo Tavory and Stefan Timmermans provide a new navigational map for theorizing qualitative research. They outline a way to think about observations, methods, and theories that nurtures theory formation without locking it into predefined conceptual boxes. The book provides novel ways to approach the challenges that plague qualitative researchers across the social sciences―how to conceptualize causality, how to manage the variation of observations, and how to leverage the researcher’s community of inquiry. Abductive Analysis is a landmark work that shows how a pragmatist approach provides a productive and fruitful way to conduct qualitative research.
As this is an academic work, I should take a different approach to rating this. But I can’t be arsed.
The overwhelming majority of this book consists, to me, of open doors. To the point that I still don’t know whether this book understands itself as an introduction to students, or a respectable treatise of method/theory.
The notion of abduction, as juxtaposed to induction and deduction, seems brilliant, but is explored in a lacklustre way. I am happy to have been pointed toward abduction’s origins in the work of Charles S. Peirce, though, that might be useful.
For all this negativity, I do need to admit to my own position, of course. I take fundamental issue with the social sciences as they are shaped today, so this was not going to be directly relevant to me anyway. And no, I am not a practitioner, not even well-read in the field, but using quantitative methods to explain human behaviour, and holding that to be the best way? Really?
Anyway, although this definitely does not align with my personal position, it does provide me with the means to sharpen my own position — because that is basically my whole project in this first thesis of mine.
It also shows me how much I differ from a general way of perceiving qualitative research, just not yet how exactly.
Also, and on this platform most importantly, I derive extremely little satisfaction from having finished this — especially compared to the other stuff I read, whether that is literature or philosophy.
Glad to have finished my first piece of reading for it. Good start.
I assigned this book for a grad level qualitative methods seminar. In all, it's brilliant! Tavory & Timmermans offer a compelling update of the techniques associated with Grounded Theory. In addition to being accessible and targeted, the endnotes offer a jumping off point for a much deeper dive into the minutia of methodological debate.
Favorite quote: “What are does—through minute description, through the use of metaphor, by taking an odd point of view, or simply through unnatural line breaks in poetry—is to force us to confront our everyday experiences as unfamiliar and thus to gain a deeper appreciation for it.”