I tried to remove my previous, more positive review that originated in Amazon... But I must have it linked here as well - so this is an edit to correct myself.
Thinking it was the master fiction writer we all know, (Stephen King), perhaps in an early, extremely undeveloped writing phase, I tried to be charitable - I have seen in many other reviewer comments and responses to my own that it's actually someone else. This would explain the appalling number of typographical and grammatical errors that pervade the Crossroad series; I plodded through the first three and felt conned... and don't get me started on plot weaknesses. Sometimes it feels like a kid writing the storyline! So, I had thought it must have been some of King's high school era writing! Though surely they would have been cleaned up by now.
I don't like to be so harsh, (though aspiring authors with poor language skills kind of deserve it for publishing without paying dues in learning the craft) but I really don't see how it's fair to the consumer for booksellers to put substandard material that hasn't even been proofed or edited on the shelf next to top selling authors so the consumers won't know that it's a case of self publication using a famous name. How is this not an encroachment of intellectual property rights? Famous people have to use fake names all the time because someone else already uses theirs. We pay for their material, the least they can do is make sure the protagonist's name is consistent throughout the story.
Don't waste your time and money on the Crossroads anthologies. More importantly, don't offend your sensibilities when you realize you've been duped by an unskilled writer that has much work to do before crafting a readable story that won't distract with errors. I'm not sure which bothers me more, the theft of one of my favorite authors' name, or the careless English, or the fact that I paid for it.