Chromophobia

FOCI

by David Batchelor

The central argument of "Chromophobia" is that a chromophobic impulse - a fear of corruption or contamination through colour - lurks within much Western cultural and intellectual thought. This is apparent in the many and varied attempts to purge colour, either by making it the property of some 'foreign body' - the oriental, the feminine, the infantile, the vulgar, or the pathological - or by relegating it to the realm of the superficial, the supplementary, the inessential, or the cosmetic. Chromophobia has been a cultural phenomenon since ancient Greek times; this book is concerned with forms of resistance to it. Writers have tended to look no further than the end of the nineteenth century. David Batchelor seeks to go beyond the limits of earlier studies, analysing the motivations behind chromophobia and considering the work of writers and artists who have been prepared to look at colour as a positive value. Exploring a wide range of imagery including Melville's "Great White Whale", Huxley's "Reflections on Mescaline", and Le Corbusier's "Journey to the East", Batchelor also discusses the use of colour in Pop, Minimal, and more recent art.

Genres: Art, Nonfiction, Philosophy, History, Theory, Art History, Design

128 pages, Kindle Edition

First published September 1, 2000

Reviews

[Alok Vaid-Menon · Rating 3 out of 5]

Why do we regard wearing black and white is more professional and formal than wearing color? Why do we continue to gender vibrant colors as feminine? Scottish artist David Batchelor coins the term “chromophobia” to capture the ways Western psyche seeks to renounce color, homogenize it, remove it of its complexity and depth. He argues that a fear of corruption or contamination from color haunts Western culture.

Western society has made us associate color with otherness, excess, irrationality, and chaos. Black and white on the other hand is projected as neutral and serious. This fear of color is perhaps best encapsulated by the German writer Johann Wolfgang van Goethe who once wrote: “savage nations, uneducated people, and children have a great prediction for vivid colors…people of refinement avoid vivid colors in their dress, and the objects that are about them and seem inclined to banish them altogether from their presence.”

Batchelor reviews an extensive body of scholarship in art history and philosophy to show how chromophobia is enabled by displacing color to the realm of a “foreign” Other (the feminine, the primitive, the queer, the pathological, etc.) bestowing it with this projective power to invade, overwhelm, infiltrate, annihilate. This is a similar and mutually informing process whereby Western culture continually imagines itself as threatened by “non-Western sensuality.”

According to Western colonial aesthetics, whiteness is whereas color does. Therefore, color must be controlled, classified, and contained.

[Fulya · Rating 3 out of 5]

The only thing that I would say about this book is, I wish Batchelor had written a long long essay out of the last two chapters rather than writing this whole book.

[Soumya Shyam · Rating 3 out of 5]

David Batchelor exposes some key truths about how colour in recent history is experienced, purposefully trivialized and in essence, feared by men in power; especially those of a higher social class and...well, white.
The book has some great cornerstones but at the same time I could not fully enjoy it because I found the writing to be extremely all over the place. There are some sudden brilliant ideas in it which also seem to vanish in thin air within the same page; they aren't explored further. Batchelor jumps from one half-explained idea to the other repeatedly, quotes one philosopher after the other and quite arbitrarily so. It makes the phenomenon of chromophobia feel much more built on random words from individuals rather than cultures as a whole.
Batchelor also uses a lot of, in my opinion, unnecessarily pompous language. It gives the book a very 'bulshitty' vibe which is sad because the ideas in it are pretty amazing. I feel they could do with some better articulations so that they become more accessible.

[WURLD · Rating 3 out of 5]

i got what i needed out of this, i’m just not big on art history specifically (but it’s good if that’s what you’re into!)

[Rubén Ruleo · Rating 2 out of 5]

Cromofobia es, para mí, un ensayo fallido. Un ensayo que parte de una premisa espectacular: "la carga cultural que tiene el color (el color como concepto) en nuestra sociedad y en el arte", pero en la que, el autor, no es capaz de sacar todo el partido.

Esto se debe, desde mi punto de vista, a su sesgo de clase y género. No es capaz de ver el potencial de sus propias tesis. Por ejemplo, expone una idea súper potente: la vinculación intrínseca del color con la otredad.

El color, desde el punto de vista de la cultura occidental, es decir, desde el punto de vista hegemónico se ha relacionado con lo femenino, con lo infantil, con lo "primitivo", con lo LGTB, con lo "vulgar". El color está vinculado con toda la disidencia del sistema clasista, racista, misógino, homófobo, tránsfobo y adultocentrista en el que estamos.

Por lo tanto el color es accesorio, irrelevante, es más, es tentador, es peligroso porque distrae de la forma, de la pureza del blanco y de la línea. Esta "cromofobia" ha estado en la base de toda enseñanza artística academicista y ha sido la triunfadora de todos los debates pictóricos sobre la forma y el color. El color (la disidencia, la otredad) se debe someter a la forma (al sistema, al statu quo), la función del color es servir, ser útil y sumiso, a la forma.

Dejarse llevar por el color y que este sea el aspecto central de la obra, sólo hará de esta pieza algo vulgar, hortera, simple, nada elevado ni profundo. Pero también esta asociación está presente en la vestimenta y en el maquillaje. Usar mucho color es hortera, está mal visto, no es elegante.

Todo este análisis que hace Batchelor me parece súper revelador y tremendamente interesante. Sin embargo, el autor, despacha estas ideas en breves paginas y se centra en unas implicaciones más filosóficas que pragmáticas, entre otras cosas debido a sus referentes casi todos señoros de pro. Además en muchos casos no se sabe cuándo analiza o crítica las ideas de estos referentes o son los pensamientos del propio Batchelor.

En cuanto al propio texto, aunque la prosa es bastante buena, la organización del texto y de las ideas no me llevaban hacia conclusiones claras sino que más bien eran nexos para ideas, muchas de ellas, interesantes pero sin una gran conclusión clara.

En definitiva, me quedo con mis propias divagaciones sobre el texto, usándo su posicionamiento como herramienta de análisis más que con el texto en sí que, como decía, es más bien fallido.

Para concluir y siguiendo con esta vinculación metafórica, llenemos nuestras vidas, nuestras caras, y nuestros cuerpos de color. Seamos unos pavos reales, horteras y estridentes, que eso también es disidencia.

[Siona Adams · Rating 1 out of 5]

Incredibly boring and pretentious. I picked this from a list of books for an assignment in one of my art classes because the topic sounded interesting. And maybe it could’ve been had it been written by someone who was concise and could get the point across in 10 pages rather than 25. Realistically this could’ve been a 10-15 page paper rather than a 125 paged book. Would not recommend at all.

[Julyssa · Rating 1 out of 5]

Chapters 4 and 5 were the least frustrating chapters of this book, like a pretentious veil had finally been lifted (briefly). Otherwise, thoughts felt incoherent and some just unnecessary. It was just overall an unpleasant read.

[Eman Naseer · Rating 4 out of 5]

Fascinating read that provided a historical and philosophical context to western cultures’ aversion to color. It was so interesting to read about the ways in which the west uses color to “other” - something I’ve felt in my own personal experiences. It was very validating to understand the cultural and intellectual underpinnings that formed these long-standing and culturally relevant ideas regarding excess, vibrance and maximalism.

[Carla]

Pues no lo leí completo, solo la primera mitad que es lo que necesitaba para el ensayo que estoy escribiendo. Me ayudó bastante y me pareció muy interesante, pero de momento no tengo intenciones de leer los últimos capítulos así que ya lo dejo marcado como leído.

[Dominika Žáková · Rating 2 out of 5]

To, že som skoro dva mesiace čítala stostranovú knihu o farbách, vraví za všetko. Úvod a záver ponúkli sľubné myšlienky a zbytok bol bohužiaľ ubíjajúci.

[Laura · Rating 3 out of 5]

This is how my reading experience went with Chromophobia:
Chapter One: Crap. I hated this book.
Chapter Two: ok. . . blablablab
Chapter Three: AH HA! because of this chapter I now hate ch. 1 less
Chapter Four: And now I hate ch. 2 less
Chapter Five: pretty good stuff

This book read backwards to me. I didn't either understand half of what the author was saying, hopefully not because of my own stupidity, but because he didn't make sense. But as the book went on, I felt I understood it more and more, by reading further I understood previous chapters better. It was an odd read, and one I did for a class. But, I had never actually thought about COLOR in such a way before, or that it had such a significant background other than being paint, or decorative. Interesting the way color is explained by a phobia or phillia, between a fall from grace or a fall into something in general. Its a good read, which leads to an examination of your own artwork, at least it did in my class.

[Troy · Rating 3 out of 5]

This is a fantastic little book that goes against the Western philosophical tendency to attack, revile, or belittle color. This book is accessible and readable, and full of interesting arguments.

But if you're looking for intellectual rigor, search out this book's Ur-text: Jacqueline Lichtenstein's The Eloquence of Color: Rhetoric and Painting in the French Classical Age. Unfortunately the book is hard to find, but it's worth it.

[Lindsay Miller · Rating 3 out of 5]

Batchelor adeptly weaves together some curious trends in our complex relationship with colour. The recurring themes certainly get you thinking, but are best taken with a grain of salt, as the examples brought into this dense little book don't always say what he thinks they do as surely as his eloquence might incline one to believe. Insightful, but not revolutionary.

[Patricia · Rating 1 out of 5]

Other far superior books that I would recommend reading instead of the poorly written, disjointed, and over-reaching Chromophobia: Richard Dyer's White or Toni Morrison's Whiteness and the Literary Imagination.

[Dasha · Rating 3 out of 5]

A jargon-laden piece of work but highly rewarding nonetheless. I now have a variety of new terms to use while defending eccentric uses of colour.

[Maye Ruiz · Rating 5 out of 5]

Un libro para chiquitiarse, para subrayarlo todo y leer un puñado de libros más a partir de.

Un libro para cromófilos… aunque los cromófobos son quienes más lo necesitan.

Chromophobia, de David Batchelor, es una obra que interpela a todos aquellos que le temen al color, revelando cómo a lo largo de la historia occidental el color ha sido injustamente relegado, asociado a lo primitivo, lo infantil o incluso lo vulgar. Aunque es un libro de nicho —ideal para artistas, diseñadores y quienes trabajan con el color—, su lectura tiene el potencial de desafiar prejuicios más allá de estas disciplinas.

Como interiorista declaradamente cromófila, encontrar este libro fue casi un acto de justicia: un “anti-gaslighting” para reafirmar que, efectivamente, el color despierta reacciones profundas, tanto de atracción como de rechazo. En palabras de Goethe:

“Cabe mencionar que las naciones salvajes, la gente inculta y los niños sienten una especial predilección por los colores vivos; que los animales se excitan hasta la ira por ciertos colores; que la gente refinada evita los colores brillantes de sus atuendos y en los objetos que les rodean, y parece inclinarse a desterrarlos por completo de su presencia.”

¿El color es infantil, salvaje o simplemente demasiado? Quizás sea hora de dejar de verlo como algo accesorio o amenazante, y empezar a reconocerlo como el poderoso medio expresivo que es. Para quienes temen al color, este libro es un reto; para quienes lo aman, una celebración 🌈

[ZindagiForEva · Rating 3 out of 5]

A interesting look at the phenomenon of western culture and patriarchal structures' perspective of color as a contaminate of the pure. There is a lot to think about and unpack here, I felt this book on touched the surface, but I'm glad it did and I'm glad I read it!

[Tittirossa · Rating 2 out of 5]

Deludente. Un saggio di cui non capisco se potermi fidare, non tanto per la profondità degli enunciati, quanto per la mancanza di una correlazione di impianto. Batchelor mette insieme dotte riflessioni e acute argomentazioni, ma tutto quello che sceglie e tralascia non viene ripreso in alcun modo. E quello che sceglie non è un pezzo dell’argomentazione ma l’argomentazione stessa.
Cromofobia è la negazione/non uso/repulsione verso il colore (inteso come cromie altre dal bianco/nero), mi aspettavo qualcosa di più solido in termini storico-argomentativi, e invece …. mah.
Ad esempio, la parte sulla cosmetica in ottica di cromofobia (intesa quest’ultima come genere culturale e non come patologia) alla fine si risolve in: il make up viene visto come contro/anti natura.
Se aggiungiamo che la fluidità espositiva non è proprio il suo cavallo di battaglia, il mah raddoppia.

Ps: inoltre il libro non contempla la contrapposizione bianco-nero data dalla stampa, che appare dolorosamente agli occhi per una tipografia (Bruno Mondadori) oltre lo scadente: il retino del nero spande, le lettere sporcano la pagina, come zampette di ragno, come finissima polvere di carbone. Uccide gli occhi, da leggere.

[Freya Stewart · Rating 4 out of 5]

A very good informative read, made me think of chromatic and a-chromatic colour from a different perspective. My favourite passage from the book is a quote from William Gass on the relationship between colour names and colours.

"The word itself (blue) has another colour. It's not a word with any resonance, although the 'e' was once pronounced. There is only a bump now between the 'b' and 'l', the relief at the end, the whew. It hasn't the sly turn which crimson takes halfway through, yellow's deceptive jelly, or the rolled down sound in brown. It hasn't violet's rapid sexual shudder, or like a rough road the irregularity of ultramarine, the low puddle of mauve like a pancake covered with cream, the dissaproving purse to pink, the assertive brevity of red, the whine of green."

This passage had me muttering the colours slowly to myself repeatedly on the train and all the passengers were looking at me very strangely

[Edith Serkownek · Rating 5 out of 5]

Chromophobia is a brilliant book-- deceptively brief, it took me much longer to get through than I would have thought because I had to stop and pull apart--mentally chew-- almost every paragraph. While I am neither an art historian nor a semiologist, this book took me into these fields and helped me to think about the myriad of ways in which western tradition expresses fear of the other. I love this work.

[Mari Amman · Rating 5 out of 5]

A must for all artists and those interested in seeing what's happening in culture and political regime right in front of their eyes.

[Kate Kosek · Rating 3 out of 5]

This book cited a lot of interesting ideas, unfortunately most of them were from white men. The writing was a bit pretentious and seemingly disconnected at times.

[Ana · Rating 4 out of 5]

A long and impassioned essay on how people scorn color - a critique of society that must be made. Can we keep making this argument, please, over and over?

[tessa s · Rating 4 out of 5]

I sat down and read this in one sitting this evening, Batchelor does a fantastic job laying out pieces of historical context regarding the Western and white supremacist view of white as pure, clean, and true. Dialectically, he then lays out that color is associated with race, homosexuality, unruliness, and untruths.

I enjoyed this short essay collection, and that Batchelor cited his sources well. The nerd in me wishes I could see a scoping review or a similar document to track the reasons why specific pieces were chosen from the western literary canon.

Favorite Parts from my Favorite Chapters:

Chapter 2. "Chromophobia manifests itself in the many and varied attempts to purge colour from culture, to devalue colour, to diminish its significance, to deny its complexity. More specifically: this purging of colour is usually accomplished in one of two ways. In the first, colour is made out to be the property of some ‘foreign’ body– usually the feminine, the oriental, 22 CHROMOPHOBIAthe primitive, the infantile, the vulgar, the queer or the pathological. In the second, colour is relegated to the realm of the superficial, the supplementary, the inessential or the cosmetic. In one, colour is regarded as alien and therefore dangerous; in the other, it is perceived merely as a secondary quality of experience, and thus unworthy of serious consideration. Colour is dangerous, or it is trivial, or it is both. (It is typical of prejudices to conflate the sinister and the superficial.) Either way, colour is routinely excluded from the higher concerns of the Mind. It is other to the higher values of Western culture. Or perhaps culture is other to the higher values of colour. Or colour is the corruption of culture."

Chapter 4. "The idea that colour is beyond, beneath or in some other way at the limit of language has been expressed in a number of ways by a number of writers. At the beginning of Colour and Culture, John Gage refers briefly to ‘the feeling that verbal language is incapable of defining the experience of colour’"

Chapter 5: Color is socially constructed, for example, the russian language has 2 words for blue [as english treats red and pink as separate colors].

In a world where the spectacle (This is me bringing in Society of the Spectacle that I read earlier in the week) is reality, where seeing is believing; Chromophobia points out the subjectivity in even that which we consider the factual fabric of reality. Thus, unraveling the way we think about color or the lack thereof within media, public/private spaces, politics, and art.

[Madeleine M · Rating 3 out of 5]

An interesting short introduction to the aversion to color held by many elite Western men of the last three centuries.

Goethe: "...it is also worthy of remark, that savage nations, uneducated people, and children have a great predilection for vivid colors, that animals are excited to rage by certain colors; that people of refinement avoid vivid colors in their dress and the objects around them, and seem inclined to banish them altogether from their presence."

Barnard Berenson: "It appears...as if form was the expression of a society where vitality and energy were severely controlled by mind, and as if color was indulged in by communities where brain was subordinated to muscle."

And the king of design psychopaths, Le Corbusier, said that color was suited to "simple races, peasants and savages."

My, what a lot to unpack! David Batchelor doesn't do much unpacking, though. This isn't a deeply researched book, and he although he touches on the overlap between white supremacy as a system of racist oppression and white supremacy in interior decoration, you'd have to go to other books for more extensive analysis. He also doesn't get into class (interesting how at least two prominent men lump "simple races" in with peasants from their own countries) or gender. To what extent was this belief in the moral superiority of form to color a male phenomenon? We'll never find out from Batchelor, since he quotes and/or names almost no women. I also wondered whether some of the aversion to color was a result of aniline dyes developed and overused in the mid-19th century, but again, you'll have to find another book to discuss all that.

[Nettles · Rating 3 out of 5]

I'm going to be honest, I used parts of the first 3 audiobook chapters to help me go to sleep when I had insomnia asdsjdj

This book doesn't really pick up until the 4th chapter for me, but that's when it gets good. Our modern society has a strange obsession with white spaces and purity, and this book aims to investigate that. The first 3 (and half of the 4th) chapters show examples of color used in different media and what it means in that media, but felt subjective, unfocused, and hard to extrapolate large ideas from small samples. Once the book dives into anthropological studies of color and culture, I was in.

The actual section about chromophobia (the obsession with whiteness) is rather small. I think I would have liked the book to expand on ideas in the last two chapters and their larger implications more than dive into examples and the minutia of the first 3/4ths of the book

[moosisai]

ma ei oskagi mingit hinnangutnagu anda,, väga kujundlik?????!??!?!? ja raskesti lahti kodeeritav...

enyweys bakhtin suitsetas oma käsikirja ära, sest tal said rullimispaberid otsa (teine maailmasõda jneee)

[ianridewood is on Storygraph · Rating 3 out of 5]

Great new term, but needs work on the landing: for an interdisciplinary theory on colour, the theorization is colourblind and the citations monochrome.

[Thoka · Rating 1 out of 5]

DNF… great topic but the author needs to be hugged more.

[migdala · Rating 5 out of 5]

one of the best things i've ever read. colour will continue to be one of my favourite things to ever be