This book attempts to educate on the unseen power of religion over race, borders, bodies, and law-like a shadow in the wake of colonialism. In the introduction, it is convincingly argued that secrecy around religious discourse produces an unsafe space for discussing matters surrounding faith. Averting nuanced discussions about faith-one's relation to being religious, spiritual, agnostic, or atheist-is dangerous. This lack of open dialogue fosters misunderstanding, intolerance, and vulnerability to divisive ideologies. I found this idea fascinating, as it speaks to how ignorance and lack of critical conversation around belief systems can lead to societal division, much like a "stranger danger" mentality.
In Chapter 2, the authors tackle the colonial "us vs. them" narrative by showing that dehumanization of other cultures was done precisely to help control others. So while their point stands, I feel the authors miss a broader history of the matter. Most religious systems throughout time, not limited to those of European colonizers, have classified in some way into believers or non-believers. This "us versus them" ethos can be seen in countless religions across the globe and is not particular to the Western colonial project. Additionally, the authors focus quite heavily on white Christian colonialism but do not include other religious conquests, and it feels like a lacuna, especially in a book that purports to discuss the broad implications of religion on race and politics.
One issue I had with the book is the simplification about the India-Pakistan border conflict. The political map of the subcontinent, and in particular the Kashmir issue, was moulded by British colonialism - at least according to the authors, but they do not explain the complexities involved. Jammu and Kashmir, for example, was a princely state, not governed directly by the British. Its future lay in the hands of its ruler, not that of the British Raj. This oversight leaves me wondering what kind of research the authors have undertaken, given their academic credentials.
I did not find much new information in Chapter 3, which deals with the theme religion and race. The analysis was very basic and also didn't try to add anything new to me regarding the subject. Chapter 4, dealing with the interaction between religion and politics, was somewhat unimpressive too. I hoped for something much more rich and nuanced in the way the constitutional promises of "freedom of religion" might interplay with the separation of church and state, while the chapter has sounded repetitive and sparse of truly critical thinking.
The conclusion unfortunately made little of a true closure or deeper insight into the themes presented, It felt like a filler .