“Smart boy, not much dough, abandoned by his mother at eight, left alone a lot as a kid, sent to boarding school, loving but absent father, forced to rely on own brilliance. Brisk university life, period of feckless womanising, moonlights as brilliant young journalist, snapped up by grumpy tycoon. Rhodes scholar, famed barrister, fabulous clever wife, adorable family, filthy-rich banker, substantial philanthropist, stormed into parliament, breezed into cabinet, seized the Liberal leadership … and that’s as far as we’ve got.”
- Annabel Crabb
This just about accounts for all that which Annabel Crabb has applied herself to exploring about Malcolm Turnbull’s life and adventures using her uniquely humorous style that is so incredibly beguiling. The way she writes about Turnbull, with frequent light-hearted jibes and caricature, is effective for so many reasons but principally because it allows a reader to be open-minded where they might otherwise be sensitive. And of course, that the time it was written and edited (2016), many people had reason to be sensitive about the way Australian politics has been run. They still do. But despite this environment being prima facie so utterly unsuitable for subtle criticism, Crabb has been successful in offering just that. Were the reader a extremely committed Turnbull fan, they might disagree with Crabb on numerous points regarding his character, or diminish their importance, and yet you can still picture them taking the underlying sharper criticism in good humour thanks to how approachable Crabb makes the criticism. This is especially impressive because much of her feature piece is about the Man’s character, which is so much more easily contested than things perhaps a little more objective like policy and professional credentials. Therefore, to give just a vague impression of this feature piece by way of a summary introduction, Crabb combines the best of stand-up with the best of veteran political correspondence. However, there are a few other things worth describing at some greater length either for their analytical merit or their entertainment value (and therefore capacity to deliver a lasting impression).
“He was a board member at the Nine Network. He advised Westpac on the handling of its $250 million loan to Channel Ten, which made the bank Ten’s principal secured creditor. He advised Hudson Conway on its bid for the Seven Network. And he had already taken nearly $10 million in fees from Fairfax, being for extensive advice to the doomed Warwick Fairfax, including a recommendation to sell the Age newspaper, which Fairfax ignored.”
Since this feature is essentially a prep for the informed public ahead of the Turnbull prime ministership it’s worth mentioning the more hard-and-fast details that Crabb considers, and one would assume she selected for their relevance to judging his suitability for the highest Australian public office. Above is a similar sort of summary as I provided at the start of this review. However, this time round it is clearly focused on the professional credentials of Malcolm Turnbull, and particularly his credentials as someone who would be able to successfully lead the Australian government to successful economic reform. However, she still acts the consummate journalist and offers an inference about his character that is without explicit statement of whether the inference reveals something positive or negative. As she explains, “chutzpah is a pretty good term to describe Malcolm’s most striking attribute in business, too. Institutionalised shamelessness would also come close”. She appears to expect this to cause a rift between Malcolm and some (probably younger) readers though and aptly proffers Turnbull’s record for philanthropy. Most notably she describes how…
“He and his wife Lucy are compulsive givers to charities, hospitals and church enterprises. Recently he handed a personal cheque for $50,000 to the Sydney Cancer Centre at a function, asking to remain anonymous (and this story did not come from Turnbull). He gave another $50,000 to charity at the 2007 Press Gallery Midwinter Ball. Most years, the Turnbulls give away somewhere in the region of half-a-million dollars.”
This strikes a reasonable (as opposed to contrived) balance.
To move onto the more idiosyncratic and entertaining attributes of her writing though we also arrive at the judgements more likely to affect the reader more concerned with Turnbull’s moral fibre. Again though, Crabb ensures that what she is offering to the reader has a definite relevance rather than being some gratuity that could have the effect of poisoning the Turnbull well ahead of an important period for his garnering of votes. Such an approach is perhaps most clearly visible in her criticism that “In circumstances – like the republic referendum – where he is required to chart a direction for others to follow, Turnbull’s results tend to be poorer”. In circumstances where leaders have been elected and then aborted by their party this is certainly of great concern. The judgements of character she provides in addition also seem to be carefully considered as they are linked to concerns about his ability to successfully lead a government. For example, there may be concerns about future party solidarity when “Good Malcolm is tremendous fun. Bad Malcolm, however, can be anywhere on the scale from distant to vicious, none of it good. Bad Malcolm is well known for blowing up at his staff”. Once again though, she is fair-minded through elaborating on the nearby positives.
“But it’s deeper than that – Turnbull, for all his notorious rages and impatience, does not appear to be driven by hate. And his reaction to people who hate him isn’t automatically to hate in return.”
All this taken together mean that what you have in your hands when you take-up this feature is probably one of the more engrossing Quarterly Essays you’re likely to read. And that is so important in a political climate that has generated even further mistrust in politicians and an associated disinterest in surveying the Australian political scene. I recommend this to anyone looking for a way to begin understanding the forces at work in Australian politics. Though it may seem outdated in 2019, there are some valuable lessons in this feature.