What do you think?
Rate this book
Enlightenment Orpheus: The Power of Music in Other Worlds
The Enlightenment saw a critical engagement with the ancient idea that music carries certain powers - it heals and pacifies, civilizes and educates. Yet this interest in musical utility seems to conflict with larger notions of aesthetic autonomy that emerged at the same time. In Enlightenment Orpheus , Vanessa Agnew examines this apparent conflict, and provocatively questions the notion of an aesthetic-philosophical break between the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Agnew persuasively connects the English traveler and music scholar Charles Burney with the ancient myth of Orpheus. She uses Burney as a guide through wide-ranging discussions of eighteenth-century musical travel, views on music's curative powers, interest in non-European music, and concerns about cultural identity. Arguing that what people said about music was central to some of the great Enlightenment debates surrounding such issues as human agency, cultural difference, and national identity, Agnew adds a new dimension to postcolonial studies, which has typically emphasized the literary and visual at the expense of the aural. She also demonstrates that these discussions must be viewed in context at the era's broad and well-entrenched transnational network, and emphasizes the importance of travel literature in generating knowledge at the time.
A new and radically interdisciplinary approach to the question of the power of music - its aesthetic and historical interpretations and political uses - Enlightenment Orpheus will appeal to students and scholars in historical musicology, ethnomusicology, German studies, eighteenth-century history, and comparative studies.
Agnew persuasively connects the English traveler and music scholar Charles Burney with the ancient myth of Orpheus. She uses Burney as a guide through wide-ranging discussions of eighteenth-century musical travel, views on music's curative powers, interest in non-European music, and concerns about cultural identity. Arguing that what people said about music was central to some of the great Enlightenment debates surrounding such issues as human agency, cultural difference, and national identity, Agnew adds a new dimension to postcolonial studies, which has typically emphasized the literary and visual at the expense of the aural. She also demonstrates that these discussions must be viewed in context at the era's broad and well-entrenched transnational network, and emphasizes the importance of travel literature in generating knowledge at the time.
A new and radically interdisciplinary approach to the question of the power of music - its aesthetic and historical interpretations and political uses - Enlightenment Orpheus will appeal to students and scholars in historical musicology, ethnomusicology, German studies, eighteenth-century history, and comparative studies.
280 pages, Hardcover
First published May 1, 2008
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
February 28, 2021
This is basically almost five stars for me. It is a feat when a book you are reading purely for information/learning ropes you into a topic you didn't know you cared about. The book is quite the undertaking as it takes the topic of eighteenth-century Orphic discourse and applies it to historiography and reception. The first chapter, "Argonaut Orpheus" focuses on Charles Burney's travels through Europe -- particularly Germany-- but also brilliantly weaves in Cook's voyages to Polynesia to make a larger point about how ideas regarding music's agency were greatly impacted by these travels. The second chapter, "Music's Empire" highlights the political implications, but also how the political and economic thoughts of the Enlightenment shaped theories of monogenesis (among others), as well as establishing hierarchies of instrumentation and texture in Western musical discourse. I found the third chapter, "Anti-Orpheus" slightly less compelling, but I think this was more because I was reading with an end-goal in mind, and this chapter was less relevant to that goal. I will go back and re-read this at some point for leisure, because I'm sure I will get even more out of it. Although it was published in 2008, I think the book resonates even more now, as we encounter some of the same patterns and myth-making while we reckon with the deficiencies of the canon and the hegemonic narratives that surround it.
Displaying 1 of 1 review