As noted by the book’s author, Rabbi Fohrman, a lot of his analysis is based on intertextuality, a word that can have a smorgasbord of meanings based on the objectives of those using it. In the academic biblical world, one would assume this would be more so a look at clues in the redaction histories of the text itself and also perhaps other texts written in the same period (ie, a made up example for this review is of taking wording from a P strand in Leviticus and comparing it to a potential P strand in Genesis).
Obviously being a book by a by-the-book Orthodox Rabbi, this is not the method used which does not necessarily detract from his analysis; in fact, the way he looks at how some words repeat in multiple Mosaic books may be less ideal for those analyzing “how the books got here” and more for those wanting to simply better understand the intentions of the Redactor/redactor/redactors (your pick based on your level of religious belief).
Finishing this book and writing “oh wow, I learned so much about Leviticus, I can’t believe it!” would be something of a lie. Books like Leviticus: A Parsha Companion for me at least, are less works of ‘enlightenment’ and more of ‘enhancement’. Playing by the rules of traditional thought can lead to running into walls regular academics disregard, but it also leads to ingenious solutions. A notable one shown early on is attempting to find out how sacrificial offerings became codified and Rabbi Fohrman thus ingeniously goes right back to the beginning with a novel take on Adam/Eve + Cain/Abel that may go unnoticed by other forms of biblical study.
This—the taking of a smidgen of Leviticus in order to go on a journey to other Mosaic books becomes a concern as the chapters pass by. I’m here to learn about Leviticus first and foremost. That on one hand there is an almost James Kugel-like deep dive in the penultimate chapter about how Cain’s distant offspring may have a connection to the Jubilee year which was pretty cool, it also seems like a major tangent (‘major’ as it may be the longest chapter in the book). The anchor of having one’s foot firmly in Leviticus at almost too many times felt unmoored, sliding along an ocean floor of Rabbinical insights that are nice and educational, but also kind of off the mark.
Thus, looking at books—especially ones considered complicated such as the third Mosaic book—through a traditional light has led to insights I’ve never considered before. However, if in some unfathomable situation I could only take one non-commentary work about Leviticus with me onto an uninhabited island, Leviticus: A Parsha Companion may be tempting, but the also ingenious way Mary Douglas looked at Leviticus through the eyes of a non-biblical scholar, non-clerical figure, but as an anthropologist in Leviticus as Literature would be the book that I take on that travel.
As a more ‘frum’ comparison, the only other series that comes to mind based on my past reading is Torah MeEtzion (coincidentally also published by Koren). Both are ‘complete’, both are written from an Orthodox perspective (albeit Rabbi Fohrman’s is originally in English while Torah MeEtzion is a translation), and both rather than being normal verse-by-verse commentaries consist of long-form essays (shiurs) on various subjects from each weekly Torah portion.
While I have not yet read TM’s Leviticus book, if it’s anything like their Exodus, it...honestly...is probably a better choice than this one. Multiple authors, multiple viewpoints, and seems to be written for a more learned audience. Rabbi Fohrman really gets to the bottom of things, but both here and in The Exodus You Almost Passed Over, a great book of his I read a few years ago, but it feels like the target audience are middle school students*. These are fun and at times enlightening reads, but may not really scratch the itch.
*Before closing out this review, one unfortunate issue that may not catch the eye of many can be found in a footnote where Rabbi Fohrman albeit while referencing the “folklore” around the American Thanksgiving tradition positively references an event, even if partially true, is not one that should be seen in such a glamorous light let alone a reference point for the actual todah (thanksgiving) sacrifice. Maggid/Koren’s team should have caught this.
Two ratings this time:
If one is new to Scripture and wants a light-touch book that’s more of a “traditional-oriented Leviticus springboard to other ideas”: 3.5/5
If one already had read a decent amount and wants something mostly focused on the book itself: 2.5/5