In the movie 1776, there's a great little exchange outside Jefferson's lodgings:
==
Dr. Benjamin Franklin: Don't worry, John, the history books will clean it up.
John Adams: Hmm... Well, I'll never appear in the history books anyway. Only you. Franklin did this, and Franklin did that, and Franklin did some other damn thing. Franklin smote the ground and out sprang George Washington - fully grown and on his horse. Franklin then electrified him with his miraculous lightning rod and the three of them, Franklin, Washington and the horse, conducted the entire revolution all by themselves.
Dr. Benjamin Franklin: [pondering] I like it.
==
Franklin is often a shorthand for American ingenuity, and his history (both that written by him and all of those historians reflecting their own times and cultures in evaluating his worth) yield simplistic views of a complicated, talented, and imperfect man.
While Ingenious: A Biography of Benjamin Franklin, Scientist sometimes strays from its promise, it always delivers a well-researched, well-written, and — to my delight— well-organized approach to examining Franklin's life and impact.
On the one hand, I was a little surprised that there is so much — perhaps half the content of the book — focus on Franklin as a statesman and the historical context (particularly in the 1870s and 1880s) for examining his place in history. I'm very familiar with the Revolutionary War era, and especially with Franklin (though less so than I am about John Adams and, as we all are, Alexander Hamilton).
Thus, I was expecting this to be more of a scientific review, when science took a backseat to statesmanship by a third of the way into the book. I was delighted that the science was easily accessed by those of us who are not scientific polymaths, but I think I might have preferred the scientific explanations to be expanded and illustrated as if I were a dim but enthusiastic child. Instead, the science was vaguely interesting, but I didn't feel like I ever fully understood the content at the level of mastery.
On the other hand, because the science spread across half the book and yet did not delve so deeply as either to confuse or elucidate but just report, I found the material about Franklin's early history and later statesmanship both familiar and compelling. While I knew dry facts and some quotes, I appreciated the anecdotes.
Why read about Benjamin Franklin? I will leave it to the author, Richard Munson, who closes out the book noting:
I have come to appreciate this complex man's continued relevance. As a vocal set of modern-day activists reject science and dismiss facts, Benjamin's life highlights the importance of verifiable analysis. As some jurists impose their (originalist) view of the Constitution, he — literally an originalist of the Constitution — insists that knowledge and laws evolve with changing circumstances. As zealots impose their religious beliefs, he makes a case for tolerance. As partisans increase t heir stridency, he shows the value of compromise and civility. As censors ban books and limit debate, he defends printers and free speech. As autocrats seek to centralize authority, he demonstrates what local associations can do by themselves.
In our narrow view of America as either red or blue and our arguments as only for or against, Franklin suggests a more nuanced world, one that is ultimately more fascinating and entertaining. We now can see him with prismatic lenses, rather than bifocals that register at most two views.
And further,
And he was a reliable enemy to the despotic, the dogmatic, and the deluded. Franklin rejected reliance on salvation, preferring to be judged by his works. As for his personal beliefs, he rebuffed religious doctrine, trusting instead reason, common sense, tolerance, and even cheerfulness. He dismissed faith in favor of observation. Most strikingly, in both science and statecraft, he spurned conventional wisdom and arbitrary power.
Well, damn. ;-)
The book is well-written, if a little dry in the scientific sections, where more delightful language could have been applied. That said, a late-in-the-book description of early attempts at flight in France, using hot-air and hydrogen balloons was entertaining and compelling!
And I loved the oft-repeated, but somehow fresh, application of wit in and optimism in response to a skeptic questioning flight's value by asking, "What is the use of a new-born baby?" I feel like NASA and all of our scientific labs might need to post this and remember that the purpose of exploration and study should never initially or primarily be commerce.
Franklin wasn't perfect, especially from our positions ~250 years hence, but his inclinations were toward practicality and expediency. (His willingness, both during the editing of the Declaration and the drafting of the Constitution, to put aside the question of slavery to ensure the passage of both, had huge unintended effects. While yes, it kicked the can far enough to allow for the creation of the United States, it ensured the continuation of a longer and even uglier path for our country.)
Franklin saw the United States as an experiment, and like all of his experiments, something requiring testing and repeated analysis and not something stuck in place for all eternity.
And when he was wrong, he was often wrong for well-intentioned reasons. He initially wanted government officials to be rich volunteers. John Adams recognized that this would yield a monopoly of power among those seeking to keep the status quo for themselves, while Franklin, who had known poverty in his youth, said,
There are two passions which have a powerful influence in the affairs of men. Thee are ambition and avarice — the love of power and the love of money. Separately, each of these has great force in prompting men to action; but when united in view of the same object, they have in minds the most violent effect."
Franklin, perhaps imagining his own experiences, thought that those who have had little would allow greed for power and money to do the worst. Adams, raised with somewhat more (and a lesser experience of the hardscrabble), saw only the selfish greed to maintain power and money among the wealthy. They were both right, and both honorable in their thinking, and both wrong, in being short-sighted.
(Perhaps either would have been better inclined to imagine what women, rather than men, might have brought to the table.)
If your interest is science, I'm not sure how much this will move the needle; if your interest in Franklin is more general, this is a cozy read that spans his life, professional endeavors, his interest in science and his service to our eventual country.