I was told by some Russian friends that Chekov was the 'must read' Russian author, and that the short stories were a good place to start. Having finished these, however, I still prefer Dostoevsky and Tolstoy, although being short stories the comparison with complete novels may be unfair.
Chekov's stories each portray small parts of the the lives of ordinary Russians and are therefore a contrast to the aristocratic settings of many of T. and D.s novels. Much of the stories are concerned with depiction of rural settings and the characters who live there, with their situation with respect to the religious establishment being a strong element in each case. I'm not sure if this latter aspect is done cynically or merely in a matter-of-fact tone that speaks plainly about the faults and strengths of religion and the religious. The 'everyday' focus also means that the philosophical discourses present in T and D are not as prominent, although it is still clear that meditation on the meaning of life was in mind as Chekov wrote. The stories are uninterrupted as a result, but I enjoy the heavy stuff, so I felt primed for it but not satisfied with an answer. Most of the stories also had a sinister undertone to them, as if a ghost or some evil presence is lurking in wait. Strangely also, I also felt as if some of the characters in the stories were connected in some way, but this is not intended I don't think.
The steppes was the longest and left the strongest impression on me. Many of the descriptions of the landscape felt similar to the mood I feel in the Australian outback: it's stark beauty and the evocative sense of loneliness and humility it inspires. And then it ends.
Not my favourite but i enjoyed the glimpse into the different time and place that Chekov wrote about.