This is great - combining the popular genre of 'why (some, especially British) railways are a bit shit' with the surely much much more important task of 'why railways, which includes trams, are by far the least destructive and carbon-intensive mode of transport and should be properly funded, staffed and expanded'. It's very comprehensive for a 250 page book, which sometimes makes it a slightly exhausting 'everything you ever wanted to ask about the future of railways', but it's also extremely well argued - and for once, with a book about the future written from the left, concrete, optimistic and plausible. Transport, as he outlines, is one of a few places (housing is another) where we actually know very well how to solve a particular problem, but refuse to do so due to sunk costs fallacies and the relatively low profitability of doing the right thing - and in the vacuum, snake oil salesmen with ludicrously crap technologies like 'hyperloop' and 'autonomous vehicles' are filling the gap (one of the underlying and highly pertinent elements of the book is an attention to the relentlessly fucking stupid treasuries of British and American central government, and their suspicion of any long-term planning whatsoever - with the result being 'car brain' and 'treasury brain' working in tandem to thwart an incredibly tried, tested and safe technology).
I'd probably have given this 5 stars, but for the almost deliberately trolling list midway through of 'top 20 railways of the world', which is measured solely by mode share, including freight (so speed, safety, comfort irrelevant), leading to some unlikely choices, let's say - though it pains me to admit he might be right about the number 1. But it'd be a 4.5, if Goodreads had them.